Cargando…

Chance elections, social distancing restrictions, and KENTUCKY’s early COVID-19 experience

Early in the pandemic, slowing the spread of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) relied on non-pharmaceutical interventions. All U.S. states adopted social-distancing restrictions in March and April of 2020, though policies varied both in timing and scope. Compared to states with Democratic go...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Courtemanche, Charles, Garuccio, Joseph, Le, Anh, Pinkston, Joshua, Yelowitz, Aaron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34197461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250152
_version_ 1783716784863444992
author Courtemanche, Charles
Garuccio, Joseph
Le, Anh
Pinkston, Joshua
Yelowitz, Aaron
author_facet Courtemanche, Charles
Garuccio, Joseph
Le, Anh
Pinkston, Joshua
Yelowitz, Aaron
author_sort Courtemanche, Charles
collection PubMed
description Early in the pandemic, slowing the spread of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) relied on non-pharmaceutical interventions. All U.S. states adopted social-distancing restrictions in March and April of 2020, though policies varied both in timing and scope. Compared to states with Democratic governors, those with Republican governors often adopted measures for shorter durations and with greater resistance from their residents. In Kentucky, an extremely close gubernatorial election immediately prior to the discovery of SARS-CoV-2 replaced a Republican incumbent with a Democrat, despite Republicans easily winning all other statewide races. This chance election result offers a unique opportunity to examine the impact of early social distancing policies in a relatively conservative, rural, white-working-class state. Our study begins by estimating an event-study model to link adoption of several common social distancing measures–public school closures, bans on large gatherings, closures of entertainment-related businesses such as restaurants, and shelter-in-place orders (SIPOs)–to the growth rate of cases across counties in the Midwest and South in the early stages of the pandemic. These policies combined to slow the daily growth rate of COVID-19 cases by 9 percentage points after 16 days, with SIPOs and entertainment establishment closures accounting for the entire effect. In order to obtain results with more direct applicability to Kentucky, we then estimate a model that interacts the policy variables with a “white working class” index characterized by political conservatism, rurality, and high percentages of white, evangelical Christian residents without college degrees. We find that the effectiveness of early social distancing measures decreased with higher values of this index. The results imply that the restrictions combined to slow the spread of COVID-19 by 12 percentage points per day in Kentucky’s two largest urban counties but had no statistically detectable effect across the rest of the state.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8248727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82487272021-07-09 Chance elections, social distancing restrictions, and KENTUCKY’s early COVID-19 experience Courtemanche, Charles Garuccio, Joseph Le, Anh Pinkston, Joshua Yelowitz, Aaron PLoS One Research Article Early in the pandemic, slowing the spread of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) relied on non-pharmaceutical interventions. All U.S. states adopted social-distancing restrictions in March and April of 2020, though policies varied both in timing and scope. Compared to states with Democratic governors, those with Republican governors often adopted measures for shorter durations and with greater resistance from their residents. In Kentucky, an extremely close gubernatorial election immediately prior to the discovery of SARS-CoV-2 replaced a Republican incumbent with a Democrat, despite Republicans easily winning all other statewide races. This chance election result offers a unique opportunity to examine the impact of early social distancing policies in a relatively conservative, rural, white-working-class state. Our study begins by estimating an event-study model to link adoption of several common social distancing measures–public school closures, bans on large gatherings, closures of entertainment-related businesses such as restaurants, and shelter-in-place orders (SIPOs)–to the growth rate of cases across counties in the Midwest and South in the early stages of the pandemic. These policies combined to slow the daily growth rate of COVID-19 cases by 9 percentage points after 16 days, with SIPOs and entertainment establishment closures accounting for the entire effect. In order to obtain results with more direct applicability to Kentucky, we then estimate a model that interacts the policy variables with a “white working class” index characterized by political conservatism, rurality, and high percentages of white, evangelical Christian residents without college degrees. We find that the effectiveness of early social distancing measures decreased with higher values of this index. The results imply that the restrictions combined to slow the spread of COVID-19 by 12 percentage points per day in Kentucky’s two largest urban counties but had no statistically detectable effect across the rest of the state. Public Library of Science 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8248727/ /pubmed/34197461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250152 Text en © 2021 Courtemanche et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Courtemanche, Charles
Garuccio, Joseph
Le, Anh
Pinkston, Joshua
Yelowitz, Aaron
Chance elections, social distancing restrictions, and KENTUCKY’s early COVID-19 experience
title Chance elections, social distancing restrictions, and KENTUCKY’s early COVID-19 experience
title_full Chance elections, social distancing restrictions, and KENTUCKY’s early COVID-19 experience
title_fullStr Chance elections, social distancing restrictions, and KENTUCKY’s early COVID-19 experience
title_full_unstemmed Chance elections, social distancing restrictions, and KENTUCKY’s early COVID-19 experience
title_short Chance elections, social distancing restrictions, and KENTUCKY’s early COVID-19 experience
title_sort chance elections, social distancing restrictions, and kentucky’s early covid-19 experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34197461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250152
work_keys_str_mv AT courtemanchecharles chanceelectionssocialdistancingrestrictionsandkentuckysearlycovid19experience
AT garucciojoseph chanceelectionssocialdistancingrestrictionsandkentuckysearlycovid19experience
AT leanh chanceelectionssocialdistancingrestrictionsandkentuckysearlycovid19experience
AT pinkstonjoshua chanceelectionssocialdistancingrestrictionsandkentuckysearlycovid19experience
AT yelowitzaaron chanceelectionssocialdistancingrestrictionsandkentuckysearlycovid19experience