Cargando…

Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we measured the primary and secondary stability of two surface-treated implants placed in the posterior maxilla, applied 3-month loading protocols, and compared and analyzed the short-term outcomes of the implants. Patients and Methods Fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyeong Gi, Yun, Pil-Young, Kim, Young-Kyun, Kim, Il-hyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187957
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.3.175
_version_ 1783716861373841408
author Kim, Hyeong Gi
Yun, Pil-Young
Kim, Young-Kyun
Kim, Il-hyung
author_facet Kim, Hyeong Gi
Yun, Pil-Young
Kim, Young-Kyun
Kim, Il-hyung
author_sort Kim, Hyeong Gi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we measured the primary and secondary stability of two surface-treated implants placed in the posterior maxilla, applied 3-month loading protocols, and compared and analyzed the short-term outcomes of the implants. Patients and Methods From June 2018 to June 2019, patients with a residual bone height of 4 mm in the posterior maxilla were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups to place SA implants (Osstem Implants, Korea) in Group A and NH implants (Hiossen, USA) in Group B. Finally, 14 implants placed in 13 patients in Group A and 17 implants placed in 14 patients in Group B were analyzed. The measured primary and secondary stability of each implant was represented by implant stability quotient (ISQ), and treatment outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Group A consisted of patients with an average age of 62.2 years (range, 48-80 years), and Group B consisted of patients with an average age of 58.1 years (range, 35-82 years). Primary stability was 73.86±6.40 and 71.24±5.32 in Groups A and B, respectively (P=0.222). Secondary stability was 79.07±5.21 in Group A and 78.29±4.74 in Group B (P=0.667). A steep increase in ISQ during the healing period was observed in Group B, though it was not significant (P=0.265). The mean follow-up period was 378.5±164.6 days in Group A and 385.3±167.9 days in Group B. All implants in each group met the success criteria, and the success rate was 100%. CONCLUSION: Two surface-treated implants placed in the posterior maxilla with greater than 4 mm alveolar bone height exhibited successful one-year treatment outcomes if a primary stability of 65 or higher ISQ was obtained and a 3-month early loading protocol was applied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8249194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82491942021-07-12 Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial Kim, Hyeong Gi Yun, Pil-Young Kim, Young-Kyun Kim, Il-hyung J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we measured the primary and secondary stability of two surface-treated implants placed in the posterior maxilla, applied 3-month loading protocols, and compared and analyzed the short-term outcomes of the implants. Patients and Methods From June 2018 to June 2019, patients with a residual bone height of 4 mm in the posterior maxilla were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups to place SA implants (Osstem Implants, Korea) in Group A and NH implants (Hiossen, USA) in Group B. Finally, 14 implants placed in 13 patients in Group A and 17 implants placed in 14 patients in Group B were analyzed. The measured primary and secondary stability of each implant was represented by implant stability quotient (ISQ), and treatment outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Group A consisted of patients with an average age of 62.2 years (range, 48-80 years), and Group B consisted of patients with an average age of 58.1 years (range, 35-82 years). Primary stability was 73.86±6.40 and 71.24±5.32 in Groups A and B, respectively (P=0.222). Secondary stability was 79.07±5.21 in Group A and 78.29±4.74 in Group B (P=0.667). A steep increase in ISQ during the healing period was observed in Group B, though it was not significant (P=0.265). The mean follow-up period was 378.5±164.6 days in Group A and 385.3±167.9 days in Group B. All implants in each group met the success criteria, and the success rate was 100%. CONCLUSION: Two surface-treated implants placed in the posterior maxilla with greater than 4 mm alveolar bone height exhibited successful one-year treatment outcomes if a primary stability of 65 or higher ISQ was obtained and a 3-month early loading protocol was applied. The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2021-06-30 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8249194/ /pubmed/34187957 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.3.175 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Hyeong Gi
Yun, Pil-Young
Kim, Young-Kyun
Kim, Il-hyung
Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187957
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.3.175
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyeonggi comparisonofsandblastedandacidetchedsurfaceimplantsandnewhydrophilicsurfaceimplantsintheposteriormaxillausinga3monthearlyloadingprotocolarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yunpilyoung comparisonofsandblastedandacidetchedsurfaceimplantsandnewhydrophilicsurfaceimplantsintheposteriormaxillausinga3monthearlyloadingprotocolarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimyoungkyun comparisonofsandblastedandacidetchedsurfaceimplantsandnewhydrophilicsurfaceimplantsintheposteriormaxillausinga3monthearlyloadingprotocolarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimilhyung comparisonofsandblastedandacidetchedsurfaceimplantsandnewhydrophilicsurfaceimplantsintheposteriormaxillausinga3monthearlyloadingprotocolarandomizedcontrolledtrial