Cargando…

Glue Embolization of Gastroesophageal Varices during Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Improves Survival Compared to Coil-only Embolization—A Single-Center Retrospective Study

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of coil versus glue embolization of gastroesophageal varices during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this monocentric retrospective study 104 (males: 67 (64%)) patients receiving TIPS with concom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolter, Karsten, Praktiknjo, Michael, Boie, Julia, Decker, Georges, Nadal, Jennifer, Jansen, Christian, Keller, Wiebke I. Y., Meyer, Carsten, Trebicka, Jonel, Attenberger, Ulrike, Thomas, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34021379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02852-y
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of coil versus glue embolization of gastroesophageal varices during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this monocentric retrospective study 104 (males: 67 (64%)) patients receiving TIPS with concomitant embolization of GEV and a minimum follow-up of one year (2008—2017) were included. Primary outcome parameter was overall survival (6 week; 1 year). Six-week overall survival was assessed as a surrogate for treatment failure as proposed by the international Baveno working group. Secondary outcome parameters were development of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), variceal rebleeding and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier with log-rank test and adjusted Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Indications for TIPS were refractory ascites (n = 33) or variceal bleeding (n = 71). Embolization was performed using glue with or without coils (n = 40) (Group G) or coil-only (n = 64) (Group NG). Overall survival was significantly better in group G (p = 0.022; HR = -3.333). Six-week survival was significantly lower in group NG (p = 0.014; HR = 6.945). Rates of development of ACLF were significantly higher in group NG after 6 months (NG = 14; G = 6; p = 0.039; HR = 3.243). Rebleeding rates (NG = 6; G = 3; p = 0.74) and development of HE (NG = 22; G = 15; p = 0.75) did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: Usage of glue in embolization of GEV may improve overall survival, reduce treatment failure and may be preferable over coil embolization alone.