Monitorización de la COVID-19 en España: ¿es posible un análisis con perspectiva de género?

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the sex disaggregation and availability of gender indicators in the reports of the National Epidemiological Surveillance Network (RENAVE) and the National Study of Sero-Epidemiology (ENE-COVID-19). METHOD: Peer review of indicators available in 72 RENAVE reports and 4 rounds of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carrillo, Marta Jiménez, Bacigalupe, Amaia, Martín, Unai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SESPAS. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2022
Materias:
Original Breve
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34330547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.06.002
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To analyse the sex disaggregation and availability of gender indicators in the reports of the National Epidemiological Surveillance Network (RENAVE) and the National Study of Sero-Epidemiology (ENE-COVID-19). METHOD: Peer review of indicators available in 72 RENAVE reports and 4 rounds of the ENE-COVID-19 study to calculate the percentage of those disaggregated by sex and their variation over time. RESULTS: In March 2021, 52.4% of RENAVE indicators were disaggregated by sex. From July 2020, 54% of disaggregated indicators ceased to be published and 23% lost their disaggregation. In the ENE-COVID-19 study, the 1 st round 88,23% of the indicators are disaggregated and the 4th round 94,74%. The 2nd and 3rd round do not disaggregated by sex. CONCLUSIONS: The RENAVE reports do not allow for a gender-sensitive analysis while the ENE-COVID-19 study provides the most information on social determinants.

Ejemplares similares