Cargando…
Conventional and microfluidic methods for airborne virus isolation and detection
With the COVID-19 pandemic, the threat of infectious diseases to public health and safety has become much more apparent. Viral, bacterial and fungal diseases have led to the loss of millions of lives, especially in the developing world. Diseases caused by airborne viruses like SARS-CoV-2 are difficu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111962 |
_version_ | 1783716953887604736 |
---|---|
author | Krokhine, Sophie Torabi, Hadis Doostmohammadi, Ali Rezai, Pouya |
author_facet | Krokhine, Sophie Torabi, Hadis Doostmohammadi, Ali Rezai, Pouya |
author_sort | Krokhine, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the COVID-19 pandemic, the threat of infectious diseases to public health and safety has become much more apparent. Viral, bacterial and fungal diseases have led to the loss of millions of lives, especially in the developing world. Diseases caused by airborne viruses like SARS-CoV-2 are difficult to control, as these viruses are easily transmissible and can circulate in the air for hours. To contain outbreaks of viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and institute targeted precautions, it is important to detect them in air and understand how they infect their targets. Point-of-care (PoC) diagnostics and point-of-need (PoN) detection methods are necessary to rapidly test patient and environmental samples, so precautions can immediately be applied. Traditional benchtop detection methods such as ELISA, PCR and culture are not suitable for PoC and PoN monitoring, because they can take hours to days and require specialized equipment. Microfluidic devices can be made at low cost to perform such assays rapidly and at the PoN. They can also be integrated with air- and liquid-based sampling technologies to capture and analyze viruses from air and body fluids. Here, conventional and microfluidic virus detection methods are reviewed and compared. The use of air sampling devices to capture and concentrate viruses is discussed first, followed by a review of analysis methods such as immunoassays, RT-PCR and isothermal amplification in conventional and microfluidic platforms. This review provides an overview of the capabilities of microfluidics in virus handling and detection, which will be useful to infectious disease researchers, biomedical engineers, and public health agencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8249716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82497162021-07-02 Conventional and microfluidic methods for airborne virus isolation and detection Krokhine, Sophie Torabi, Hadis Doostmohammadi, Ali Rezai, Pouya Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces Article With the COVID-19 pandemic, the threat of infectious diseases to public health and safety has become much more apparent. Viral, bacterial and fungal diseases have led to the loss of millions of lives, especially in the developing world. Diseases caused by airborne viruses like SARS-CoV-2 are difficult to control, as these viruses are easily transmissible and can circulate in the air for hours. To contain outbreaks of viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and institute targeted precautions, it is important to detect them in air and understand how they infect their targets. Point-of-care (PoC) diagnostics and point-of-need (PoN) detection methods are necessary to rapidly test patient and environmental samples, so precautions can immediately be applied. Traditional benchtop detection methods such as ELISA, PCR and culture are not suitable for PoC and PoN monitoring, because they can take hours to days and require specialized equipment. Microfluidic devices can be made at low cost to perform such assays rapidly and at the PoN. They can also be integrated with air- and liquid-based sampling technologies to capture and analyze viruses from air and body fluids. Here, conventional and microfluidic virus detection methods are reviewed and compared. The use of air sampling devices to capture and concentrate viruses is discussed first, followed by a review of analysis methods such as immunoassays, RT-PCR and isothermal amplification in conventional and microfluidic platforms. This review provides an overview of the capabilities of microfluidics in virus handling and detection, which will be useful to infectious disease researchers, biomedical engineers, and public health agencies. Elsevier B.V. 2021-10 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8249716/ /pubmed/34352699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111962 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Krokhine, Sophie Torabi, Hadis Doostmohammadi, Ali Rezai, Pouya Conventional and microfluidic methods for airborne virus isolation and detection |
title | Conventional and microfluidic methods for airborne virus isolation and detection |
title_full | Conventional and microfluidic methods for airborne virus isolation and detection |
title_fullStr | Conventional and microfluidic methods for airborne virus isolation and detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Conventional and microfluidic methods for airborne virus isolation and detection |
title_short | Conventional and microfluidic methods for airborne virus isolation and detection |
title_sort | conventional and microfluidic methods for airborne virus isolation and detection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111962 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krokhinesophie conventionalandmicrofluidicmethodsforairbornevirusisolationanddetection AT torabihadis conventionalandmicrofluidicmethodsforairbornevirusisolationanddetection AT doostmohammadiali conventionalandmicrofluidicmethodsforairbornevirusisolationanddetection AT rezaipouya conventionalandmicrofluidicmethodsforairbornevirusisolationanddetection |