Cargando…
Understanding Mental Health and Cognitive Restructuring With Ecological Neuroscience
Neuroimaging and neuropsychological methods have contributed much toward an understanding of the information processing systems of the human brain in the last few decades, but to what extent do cognitive neuroscientific findings represent and generalize to the inter- and intra-brain dynamics engaged...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.697095 |
_version_ | 1783717003008147456 |
---|---|
author | Crum, James |
author_facet | Crum, James |
author_sort | Crum, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neuroimaging and neuropsychological methods have contributed much toward an understanding of the information processing systems of the human brain in the last few decades, but to what extent do cognitive neuroscientific findings represent and generalize to the inter- and intra-brain dynamics engaged in adapting to naturalistic situations? If it is not marked, and experimental designs lack ecological validity, then this stands to potentially impact the practical applications of a paradigm. In no other domain is this more important to acknowledge than in human clinical neuroimaging research, wherein reduced ecological validity could mean a loss in clinical utility. One way to improve the generalizability and representativeness of findings is to adopt a more “real-world” approach to the development and selection of experimental designs and neuroimaging techniques to investigate the clinically-relevant phenomena of interest. For example, some relatively recent developments to neuroimaging techniques such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) make it possible to create experimental designs using naturalistic tasks that would otherwise not be possible within the confines of a conventional laboratory. Mental health, cognitive interventions, and the present challenges to investigating the brain during treatment are discussed, as well as how the ecological use of fNIRS might be helpful in bridging the explanatory gaps to understanding the cultivation of mental health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8249924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82499242021-07-03 Understanding Mental Health and Cognitive Restructuring With Ecological Neuroscience Crum, James Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Neuroimaging and neuropsychological methods have contributed much toward an understanding of the information processing systems of the human brain in the last few decades, but to what extent do cognitive neuroscientific findings represent and generalize to the inter- and intra-brain dynamics engaged in adapting to naturalistic situations? If it is not marked, and experimental designs lack ecological validity, then this stands to potentially impact the practical applications of a paradigm. In no other domain is this more important to acknowledge than in human clinical neuroimaging research, wherein reduced ecological validity could mean a loss in clinical utility. One way to improve the generalizability and representativeness of findings is to adopt a more “real-world” approach to the development and selection of experimental designs and neuroimaging techniques to investigate the clinically-relevant phenomena of interest. For example, some relatively recent developments to neuroimaging techniques such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) make it possible to create experimental designs using naturalistic tasks that would otherwise not be possible within the confines of a conventional laboratory. Mental health, cognitive interventions, and the present challenges to investigating the brain during treatment are discussed, as well as how the ecological use of fNIRS might be helpful in bridging the explanatory gaps to understanding the cultivation of mental health. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8249924/ /pubmed/34220594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.697095 Text en Copyright © 2021 Crum. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Crum, James Understanding Mental Health and Cognitive Restructuring With Ecological Neuroscience |
title | Understanding Mental Health and Cognitive Restructuring With Ecological Neuroscience |
title_full | Understanding Mental Health and Cognitive Restructuring With Ecological Neuroscience |
title_fullStr | Understanding Mental Health and Cognitive Restructuring With Ecological Neuroscience |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding Mental Health and Cognitive Restructuring With Ecological Neuroscience |
title_short | Understanding Mental Health and Cognitive Restructuring With Ecological Neuroscience |
title_sort | understanding mental health and cognitive restructuring with ecological neuroscience |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34220594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.697095 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crumjames understandingmentalhealthandcognitiverestructuringwithecologicalneuroscience |