Cargando…
Teledermatology in times of COVID‐19
Remote consultations are likely to grow in importance in the following years, especially if the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic continues. Patients’ opinions on teledermatology have already been analyzed, but a current analysis during the COVID‐19 pandemic is lacking. The purpose of thi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8250059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33715181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.15812 |
_version_ | 1783717020283437056 |
---|---|
author | Stadler, Pia‐Charlotte Senner, Sonja Frey, Surina Clanner‐Engelshofen, Benjamin M. H. Frommherz, Leonie French, Lars E. Reinholz, Markus |
author_facet | Stadler, Pia‐Charlotte Senner, Sonja Frey, Surina Clanner‐Engelshofen, Benjamin M. H. Frommherz, Leonie French, Lars E. Reinholz, Markus |
author_sort | Stadler, Pia‐Charlotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | Remote consultations are likely to grow in importance in the following years, especially if the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic continues. Patients’ opinions on teledermatology have already been analyzed, but a current analysis during the COVID‐19 pandemic is lacking. The purpose of this survey was to investigate the satisfaction of patients who had received dermatological advice via telephone during the COVID‐19 pandemic and to analyze their general opinion about eHealth as well as possible limitations for a broad implementation. Ninety‐one patients managed in the dermatology department using telephone consultation during the COVID‐19 pandemic were interviewed. An anonymous questionnaire, including the established quality of life questionnaire (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), was used. It was found that men were more satisfied with telephone consultations than women (p = 0.029), educational level and age did not correlate with satisfaction (p = 0.186 and 388, respectively), and the longer the waiting time for a telephone consultation, the lower the satisfaction (p = 0.001). Grouped analysis of all participants showed that the majority (54.0% n = 38/71) were “very happy” with the telephone consultation. Higher disease burden (DLQI) was associated with lower satisfaction (p = 0.042). The main stated reasons for using telemedicine were shorter waiting times (51.6% n = 47/91) and no travel requirement (57.1% n = 47/91). Almost one‐quarter (23.1% n = 21/89) of patients would use teledermatology in the future, 17.6% (n = 16/89) would not, and 57.1% (n = 51/89) would only use it in addition to a traditional consultation with personal contact. In conclusion, most patients in the study group still preferred traditional face‐to‐face medical consultations to telephone consultations, but also desired an add‐on telemedical tool. Dermatological care using more modern telemedicine technologies than telephone conferencing is needed to better address patients’ desires, especially in times of the COVID‐19 pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8250059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82500592021-07-02 Teledermatology in times of COVID‐19 Stadler, Pia‐Charlotte Senner, Sonja Frey, Surina Clanner‐Engelshofen, Benjamin M. H. Frommherz, Leonie French, Lars E. Reinholz, Markus J Dermatol Original Articles Remote consultations are likely to grow in importance in the following years, especially if the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic continues. Patients’ opinions on teledermatology have already been analyzed, but a current analysis during the COVID‐19 pandemic is lacking. The purpose of this survey was to investigate the satisfaction of patients who had received dermatological advice via telephone during the COVID‐19 pandemic and to analyze their general opinion about eHealth as well as possible limitations for a broad implementation. Ninety‐one patients managed in the dermatology department using telephone consultation during the COVID‐19 pandemic were interviewed. An anonymous questionnaire, including the established quality of life questionnaire (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]), was used. It was found that men were more satisfied with telephone consultations than women (p = 0.029), educational level and age did not correlate with satisfaction (p = 0.186 and 388, respectively), and the longer the waiting time for a telephone consultation, the lower the satisfaction (p = 0.001). Grouped analysis of all participants showed that the majority (54.0% n = 38/71) were “very happy” with the telephone consultation. Higher disease burden (DLQI) was associated with lower satisfaction (p = 0.042). The main stated reasons for using telemedicine were shorter waiting times (51.6% n = 47/91) and no travel requirement (57.1% n = 47/91). Almost one‐quarter (23.1% n = 21/89) of patients would use teledermatology in the future, 17.6% (n = 16/89) would not, and 57.1% (n = 51/89) would only use it in addition to a traditional consultation with personal contact. In conclusion, most patients in the study group still preferred traditional face‐to‐face medical consultations to telephone consultations, but also desired an add‐on telemedical tool. Dermatological care using more modern telemedicine technologies than telephone conferencing is needed to better address patients’ desires, especially in times of the COVID‐19 pandemic. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-14 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8250059/ /pubmed/33715181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.15812 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Stadler, Pia‐Charlotte Senner, Sonja Frey, Surina Clanner‐Engelshofen, Benjamin M. H. Frommherz, Leonie French, Lars E. Reinholz, Markus Teledermatology in times of COVID‐19 |
title | Teledermatology in times of COVID‐19 |
title_full | Teledermatology in times of COVID‐19 |
title_fullStr | Teledermatology in times of COVID‐19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Teledermatology in times of COVID‐19 |
title_short | Teledermatology in times of COVID‐19 |
title_sort | teledermatology in times of covid‐19 |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8250059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33715181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.15812 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stadlerpiacharlotte teledermatologyintimesofcovid19 AT sennersonja teledermatologyintimesofcovid19 AT freysurina teledermatologyintimesofcovid19 AT clannerengelshofenbenjaminm teledermatologyintimesofcovid19 AT hfrommherzleonie teledermatologyintimesofcovid19 AT frenchlarse teledermatologyintimesofcovid19 AT reinholzmarkus teledermatologyintimesofcovid19 |