Cargando…
Programmed Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Inter-Pathologist Concordance and Inter-Assay Variability
PURPOSE: The programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) SP142 assay with a 1% immune cell (IC) cutoff is approved for the selection of advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients for atezolizumab treatment. We aimed to evaluate the interobserver concordance of PD-L1 scoring and inter-assay variabi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Breast Cancer Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8250096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34128367 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e29 |
_version_ | 1783717021022683136 |
---|---|
author | Ahn, Soomin Woo, Ji Won Kim, Hyojin Cho, Eun Yoon Kim, Ahrong Kim, Jee Yeon Kim, Chungyeul Lee, Hee Jin Lee, Ji Shin Bae, Young Kyung Kwon, Youngmee Kim, Wan Seop Park, So Yeon |
author_facet | Ahn, Soomin Woo, Ji Won Kim, Hyojin Cho, Eun Yoon Kim, Ahrong Kim, Jee Yeon Kim, Chungyeul Lee, Hee Jin Lee, Ji Shin Bae, Young Kyung Kwon, Youngmee Kim, Wan Seop Park, So Yeon |
author_sort | Ahn, Soomin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) SP142 assay with a 1% immune cell (IC) cutoff is approved for the selection of advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients for atezolizumab treatment. We aimed to evaluate the interobserver concordance of PD-L1 scoring and inter-assay variability of various PD-L1 assays in TNBC. METHODS: Thirty patients with primary TNBC were selected, and SP142, SP263, 22C3, and E1L3N assays were performed. PD-L1 staining in ICs and tumor cells (TCs) was scored by 10 pathologists who were blinded to the assay. The interobserver concordance among pathologists and the inter-assay variability of the four PD-L1 assays were analyzed. For SP142, the intraobserver concordance among the six pathologists was analyzed after training. RESULTS: The adjusted means of PD-L1 IC scoring ranged from 6.2% to 12.9% for the four assays; the intraclass correlations showed moderate (0.584–0.649) reader concordance. The PD-L1 IC scoring with a 1% cutoff resulted in identical scoring in 40.0%–66.7% of cases and a poor to moderate agreement (Fleiss κ statistic [FKS] = 0.345–0.534) for the four assays. The SP142 assay had the widest range of positive rate (56.5%–100.0%), lowest number of cases with identical scoring, and lowest FKS at 1% cutoff. Pairwise comparison of adjusted means showed significantly decreased PD-L1 staining in SP142 compared with the other assays in both ICs and TCs. As for the intraobserver concordance in the SP142 assay, the overall percent agreement was 87.8% with a 1% IC cutoff. After training, the proportion of cases with identical scoring at a 1% IC cutoff increased to 70.0%; the FKS also increased to 0.610. CONCLUSION: The concordance of PD-L1 IC scoring among pathologists was low, at the 1% cutoff for the SP142 assay without training. SP142 showed the lowest PD-L1 expression in both IC and TC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8250096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Korean Breast Cancer Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82500962021-07-06 Programmed Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Inter-Pathologist Concordance and Inter-Assay Variability Ahn, Soomin Woo, Ji Won Kim, Hyojin Cho, Eun Yoon Kim, Ahrong Kim, Jee Yeon Kim, Chungyeul Lee, Hee Jin Lee, Ji Shin Bae, Young Kyung Kwon, Youngmee Kim, Wan Seop Park, So Yeon J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: The programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) SP142 assay with a 1% immune cell (IC) cutoff is approved for the selection of advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients for atezolizumab treatment. We aimed to evaluate the interobserver concordance of PD-L1 scoring and inter-assay variability of various PD-L1 assays in TNBC. METHODS: Thirty patients with primary TNBC were selected, and SP142, SP263, 22C3, and E1L3N assays were performed. PD-L1 staining in ICs and tumor cells (TCs) was scored by 10 pathologists who were blinded to the assay. The interobserver concordance among pathologists and the inter-assay variability of the four PD-L1 assays were analyzed. For SP142, the intraobserver concordance among the six pathologists was analyzed after training. RESULTS: The adjusted means of PD-L1 IC scoring ranged from 6.2% to 12.9% for the four assays; the intraclass correlations showed moderate (0.584–0.649) reader concordance. The PD-L1 IC scoring with a 1% cutoff resulted in identical scoring in 40.0%–66.7% of cases and a poor to moderate agreement (Fleiss κ statistic [FKS] = 0.345–0.534) for the four assays. The SP142 assay had the widest range of positive rate (56.5%–100.0%), lowest number of cases with identical scoring, and lowest FKS at 1% cutoff. Pairwise comparison of adjusted means showed significantly decreased PD-L1 staining in SP142 compared with the other assays in both ICs and TCs. As for the intraobserver concordance in the SP142 assay, the overall percent agreement was 87.8% with a 1% IC cutoff. After training, the proportion of cases with identical scoring at a 1% IC cutoff increased to 70.0%; the FKS also increased to 0.610. CONCLUSION: The concordance of PD-L1 IC scoring among pathologists was low, at the 1% cutoff for the SP142 assay without training. SP142 showed the lowest PD-L1 expression in both IC and TC. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8250096/ /pubmed/34128367 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e29 Text en © 2021 Korean Breast Cancer Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ahn, Soomin Woo, Ji Won Kim, Hyojin Cho, Eun Yoon Kim, Ahrong Kim, Jee Yeon Kim, Chungyeul Lee, Hee Jin Lee, Ji Shin Bae, Young Kyung Kwon, Youngmee Kim, Wan Seop Park, So Yeon Programmed Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Inter-Pathologist Concordance and Inter-Assay Variability |
title | Programmed Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Inter-Pathologist Concordance and Inter-Assay Variability |
title_full | Programmed Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Inter-Pathologist Concordance and Inter-Assay Variability |
title_fullStr | Programmed Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Inter-Pathologist Concordance and Inter-Assay Variability |
title_full_unstemmed | Programmed Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Inter-Pathologist Concordance and Inter-Assay Variability |
title_short | Programmed Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Inter-Pathologist Concordance and Inter-Assay Variability |
title_sort | programmed death ligand 1 immunohistochemistry in triple-negative breast cancer: evaluation of inter-pathologist concordance and inter-assay variability |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8250096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34128367 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e29 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahnsoomin programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT woojiwon programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT kimhyojin programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT choeunyoon programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT kimahrong programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT kimjeeyeon programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT kimchungyeul programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT leeheejin programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT leejishin programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT baeyoungkyung programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT kwonyoungmee programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT kimwanseop programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability AT parksoyeon programmeddeathligand1immunohistochemistryintriplenegativebreastcancerevaluationofinterpathologistconcordanceandinterassayvariability |