Cargando…

Use and perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems among patients attending lung cancer screening who smoke

Given accumulating evidence that electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) may be a harm-reduction alternative to combustible tobacco products, it is important to understand the real-world implications of these devices in the populations that may benefit from them the most. We surveyed the use, pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fucito, Lisa M., Bold, Krysten W., Baldassarri, Stephen R., LaVigne, John P., Ford, Bennie, Sather, Polly, O'Malley, Stephanie S., Toll, Benjamin A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8250441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101444
_version_ 1783717049412878336
author Fucito, Lisa M.
Bold, Krysten W.
Baldassarri, Stephen R.
LaVigne, John P.
Ford, Bennie
Sather, Polly
O'Malley, Stephanie S.
Toll, Benjamin A.
author_facet Fucito, Lisa M.
Bold, Krysten W.
Baldassarri, Stephen R.
LaVigne, John P.
Ford, Bennie
Sather, Polly
O'Malley, Stephanie S.
Toll, Benjamin A.
author_sort Fucito, Lisa M.
collection PubMed
description Given accumulating evidence that electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) may be a harm-reduction alternative to combustible tobacco products, it is important to understand the real-world implications of these devices in the populations that may benefit from them the most. We surveyed the use, perceptions of, and interest in using ENDS among patients attending their initial low-dose CT scan (LDCT) for lung cancer screening (LCS) who reported current smoking, a cohort of older individuals at high-risk for lung cancer and other smoking-related illnesses due to their heavy smoking history (30 or more pack years). Participants (N = 107) completed the survey in clinic immediately before their shared decision-making visit for lung cancer screening on the day of their LDCT. Approximately a quarter of participants reported ever use of ENDS in the past; nearly a third expressed a willingness to try switching to them in the future. Prior ENDS use was significantly associated with willingness to try switching to ENDS in the future. The most common reasons to consider switching included smoking cessation and harm reduction. Only about a third were aware that ENDS are not approved by the FDA for smoking cessation; knowledge significantly varied by demographic and clinical characteristics. These findings have important implications for ENDS public health campaigns and tobacco harm reduction strategies for older individuals who smoke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8250441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82504412021-07-06 Use and perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems among patients attending lung cancer screening who smoke Fucito, Lisa M. Bold, Krysten W. Baldassarri, Stephen R. LaVigne, John P. Ford, Bennie Sather, Polly O'Malley, Stephanie S. Toll, Benjamin A. Prev Med Rep Short Communication Given accumulating evidence that electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) may be a harm-reduction alternative to combustible tobacco products, it is important to understand the real-world implications of these devices in the populations that may benefit from them the most. We surveyed the use, perceptions of, and interest in using ENDS among patients attending their initial low-dose CT scan (LDCT) for lung cancer screening (LCS) who reported current smoking, a cohort of older individuals at high-risk for lung cancer and other smoking-related illnesses due to their heavy smoking history (30 or more pack years). Participants (N = 107) completed the survey in clinic immediately before their shared decision-making visit for lung cancer screening on the day of their LDCT. Approximately a quarter of participants reported ever use of ENDS in the past; nearly a third expressed a willingness to try switching to them in the future. Prior ENDS use was significantly associated with willingness to try switching to ENDS in the future. The most common reasons to consider switching included smoking cessation and harm reduction. Only about a third were aware that ENDS are not approved by the FDA for smoking cessation; knowledge significantly varied by demographic and clinical characteristics. These findings have important implications for ENDS public health campaigns and tobacco harm reduction strategies for older individuals who smoke. 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8250441/ /pubmed/34235048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101444 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
Fucito, Lisa M.
Bold, Krysten W.
Baldassarri, Stephen R.
LaVigne, John P.
Ford, Bennie
Sather, Polly
O'Malley, Stephanie S.
Toll, Benjamin A.
Use and perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems among patients attending lung cancer screening who smoke
title Use and perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems among patients attending lung cancer screening who smoke
title_full Use and perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems among patients attending lung cancer screening who smoke
title_fullStr Use and perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems among patients attending lung cancer screening who smoke
title_full_unstemmed Use and perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems among patients attending lung cancer screening who smoke
title_short Use and perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems among patients attending lung cancer screening who smoke
title_sort use and perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems among patients attending lung cancer screening who smoke
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8250441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101444
work_keys_str_mv AT fucitolisam useandperceptionsofelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsamongpatientsattendinglungcancerscreeningwhosmoke
AT boldkrystenw useandperceptionsofelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsamongpatientsattendinglungcancerscreeningwhosmoke
AT baldassarristephenr useandperceptionsofelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsamongpatientsattendinglungcancerscreeningwhosmoke
AT lavignejohnp useandperceptionsofelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsamongpatientsattendinglungcancerscreeningwhosmoke
AT fordbennie useandperceptionsofelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsamongpatientsattendinglungcancerscreeningwhosmoke
AT satherpolly useandperceptionsofelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsamongpatientsattendinglungcancerscreeningwhosmoke
AT omalleystephanies useandperceptionsofelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsamongpatientsattendinglungcancerscreeningwhosmoke
AT tollbenjamina useandperceptionsofelectronicnicotinedeliverysystemsamongpatientsattendinglungcancerscreeningwhosmoke