Cargando…

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries: ATLAS global surveillance programme 2015–18

OBJECTIVES: To assess the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against a recent, 2015–18, collection of clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli from Middle Eastern and African countries with a focus on isolates from ICUs and with MDR and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotypes. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karlowsky, James A, Bouchillon, Samuel K, El Mahdy Kotb, Ramy, Mohamed, Naglaa, Stone, Gregory G, Sahm, Daniel F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab067
_version_ 1783717087713165312
author Karlowsky, James A
Bouchillon, Samuel K
El Mahdy Kotb, Ramy
Mohamed, Naglaa
Stone, Gregory G
Sahm, Daniel F
author_facet Karlowsky, James A
Bouchillon, Samuel K
El Mahdy Kotb, Ramy
Mohamed, Naglaa
Stone, Gregory G
Sahm, Daniel F
author_sort Karlowsky, James A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against a recent, 2015–18, collection of clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli from Middle Eastern and African countries with a focus on isolates from ICUs and with MDR and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotypes. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 4608 isolates of Enterobacterales (997 isolates from ICU patients) and 1358 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (374 isolates from ICU patients) was performed by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central laboratory. MICs were interpreted using both CLSI (2020) and EUCAST (2020) MIC breakpoints. RESULTS: Most isolates of Enterobacterales (Middle East: ICU, 99.1% susceptible, non-ICU, 99.1%; Africa: ICU, 96.9% susceptible, non-ICU, 98.3%) and P. aeruginosa (Middle East: ICU, 93.4%, non-ICU, 92.1%; Africa: ICU, 89.8%; non-ICU, 94.1%) were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. Applying CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints, MDR rates were similar for Enterobacterales (27.8%–36.0% of isolates) and P. aeruginosa (25.0%–36.4%) while DTR rates were lower for Enterobacterales (1.6%–1.8%) than for P. aeruginosa (5.2%–7.4%). Percentage susceptible rates for ceftazidime/avibactam for MDR Enterobacterales were 96.8%–97.5% (Middle East) and 92.5%–94.3% (Africa) while rates for P. aeruginosa were 70.1%–80.0% (Middle East) and 69.5%–78.2% (Africa). 60.5%–65.8% (Middle East) and 38.9%–52.2% (Africa) of isolates of Enterobacterales with DTR phenotypes were ceftazidime/avibactam susceptible as were 29.2%–31.1% (Middle East) and 28.2%–35.8% (Africa) of DTR P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa tested from Middle Eastern and African countries were highly susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. Most MDR and many DTR isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8251253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82512532021-07-02 In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries: ATLAS global surveillance programme 2015–18 Karlowsky, James A Bouchillon, Samuel K El Mahdy Kotb, Ramy Mohamed, Naglaa Stone, Gregory G Sahm, Daniel F JAC Antimicrob Resist Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against a recent, 2015–18, collection of clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli from Middle Eastern and African countries with a focus on isolates from ICUs and with MDR and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotypes. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 4608 isolates of Enterobacterales (997 isolates from ICU patients) and 1358 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (374 isolates from ICU patients) was performed by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central laboratory. MICs were interpreted using both CLSI (2020) and EUCAST (2020) MIC breakpoints. RESULTS: Most isolates of Enterobacterales (Middle East: ICU, 99.1% susceptible, non-ICU, 99.1%; Africa: ICU, 96.9% susceptible, non-ICU, 98.3%) and P. aeruginosa (Middle East: ICU, 93.4%, non-ICU, 92.1%; Africa: ICU, 89.8%; non-ICU, 94.1%) were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. Applying CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints, MDR rates were similar for Enterobacterales (27.8%–36.0% of isolates) and P. aeruginosa (25.0%–36.4%) while DTR rates were lower for Enterobacterales (1.6%–1.8%) than for P. aeruginosa (5.2%–7.4%). Percentage susceptible rates for ceftazidime/avibactam for MDR Enterobacterales were 96.8%–97.5% (Middle East) and 92.5%–94.3% (Africa) while rates for P. aeruginosa were 70.1%–80.0% (Middle East) and 69.5%–78.2% (Africa). 60.5%–65.8% (Middle East) and 38.9%–52.2% (Africa) of isolates of Enterobacterales with DTR phenotypes were ceftazidime/avibactam susceptible as were 29.2%–31.1% (Middle East) and 28.2%–35.8% (Africa) of DTR P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa tested from Middle Eastern and African countries were highly susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. Most MDR and many DTR isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. Oxford University Press 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8251253/ /pubmed/34223129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab067 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karlowsky, James A
Bouchillon, Samuel K
El Mahdy Kotb, Ramy
Mohamed, Naglaa
Stone, Gregory G
Sahm, Daniel F
In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries: ATLAS global surveillance programme 2015–18
title In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries: ATLAS global surveillance programme 2015–18
title_full In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries: ATLAS global surveillance programme 2015–18
title_fullStr In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries: ATLAS global surveillance programme 2015–18
title_full_unstemmed In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries: ATLAS global surveillance programme 2015–18
title_short In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries: ATLAS global surveillance programme 2015–18
title_sort in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of enterobacterales and pseudomonas aeruginosa from middle eastern and african countries: atlas global surveillance programme 2015–18
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab067
work_keys_str_mv AT karlowskyjamesa invitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamagainstclinicalisolatesofenterobacteralesandpseudomonasaeruginosafrommiddleeasternandafricancountriesatlasglobalsurveillanceprogramme201518
AT bouchillonsamuelk invitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamagainstclinicalisolatesofenterobacteralesandpseudomonasaeruginosafrommiddleeasternandafricancountriesatlasglobalsurveillanceprogramme201518
AT elmahdykotbramy invitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamagainstclinicalisolatesofenterobacteralesandpseudomonasaeruginosafrommiddleeasternandafricancountriesatlasglobalsurveillanceprogramme201518
AT mohamednaglaa invitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamagainstclinicalisolatesofenterobacteralesandpseudomonasaeruginosafrommiddleeasternandafricancountriesatlasglobalsurveillanceprogramme201518
AT stonegregoryg invitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamagainstclinicalisolatesofenterobacteralesandpseudomonasaeruginosafrommiddleeasternandafricancountriesatlasglobalsurveillanceprogramme201518
AT sahmdanielf invitroactivityofceftazidimeavibactamagainstclinicalisolatesofenterobacteralesandpseudomonasaeruginosafrommiddleeasternandafricancountriesatlasglobalsurveillanceprogramme201518