Cargando…

Feasibility, Outcomes, and Safety of Telehepatology Services During the COVID‐19 Pandemic

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has hampered health care delivery globally. We evaluated the feasibility, outcomes, and safety of telehepatology in delivering quality care amid the pandemic. A telemedicine setup using smartphones by hepatologists was organized at our tertiary‐care center after p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verma, Nipun, Mishra, Saurabh, Singh, Surender, Kaur, Rajwant, Kaur, Talwinder, De, Arka, Premkumar, Madhumita, Taneja, Sunil, Duseja, Ajay, Singh, Meenu, Singh, Virendra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34230904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1732
_version_ 1783717096084996096
author Verma, Nipun
Mishra, Saurabh
Singh, Surender
Kaur, Rajwant
Kaur, Talwinder
De, Arka
Premkumar, Madhumita
Taneja, Sunil
Duseja, Ajay
Singh, Meenu
Singh, Virendra
author_facet Verma, Nipun
Mishra, Saurabh
Singh, Surender
Kaur, Rajwant
Kaur, Talwinder
De, Arka
Premkumar, Madhumita
Taneja, Sunil
Duseja, Ajay
Singh, Meenu
Singh, Virendra
author_sort Verma, Nipun
collection PubMed
description Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has hampered health care delivery globally. We evaluated the feasibility, outcomes, and safety of telehepatology in delivering quality care amid the pandemic. A telemedicine setup using smartphones by hepatologists was organized at our tertiary‐care center after pilot testing. Consecutive patients availing telehepatology services were recruited between March and July 2020. An adapted model for assessment of telemedicine was used after validity and reliability testing, to evaluate services 7‐21 days after index teleconsultation. Of the 1,419 registrations, 1,281 (90.3%) consultations were completed. From 245 randomly surveyed patients, 210 (85.7%) responded (age [years, interquartile range]: 46 [35‐56]; 32.3% females). Seventy percent of patients belonged to the middle or lower socio‐economic class, whereas 61% were from rural areas. Modes of teleconsultation were audio (54.3%) or hybrid video call (45.7%). Teleconsultation alone was deemed suitable in 88.6% of patients. Diagnosis and compliance rates were 94% and 82.4%, respectively. Patients’ convenience rate, satisfaction rate, improvement rate, success rate, and net promoter scores were 99.0%, 85.2%, 49.5%, 46.2% and 70, respectively. Physical and mental quality of life improved in 67.1% and 82.8% of patients, respectively, following index teleconsultation. Person‐hours and money spent by patients were significantly lower with teleconsultation (P < 0.001); however, person‐hours spent by hospital per teleconsultation were higher than in physical outpatient services (P < 0.001). Dissatisfied patients were more likely to have lower diagnosis rate, unsuitability for teleconsultation, noncompliance, poorer understanding, and uncomfortable conversation during teleconsultation. Connectivity issues (22.9%) were the most common barrier. Three patients, all of whom were advised emergency care during teleconsultation, succumbed to their illness. Conclusion: Telehepatology is a feasible and reasonably effective tool for rendering health care services using smartphones during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Systematic implementation, possible integration into routine health care delivery, and formal cost‐effectiveness of telehepatology services need further exploration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8251420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82514202021-07-02 Feasibility, Outcomes, and Safety of Telehepatology Services During the COVID‐19 Pandemic Verma, Nipun Mishra, Saurabh Singh, Surender Kaur, Rajwant Kaur, Talwinder De, Arka Premkumar, Madhumita Taneja, Sunil Duseja, Ajay Singh, Meenu Singh, Virendra Hepatol Commun Original Articles Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has hampered health care delivery globally. We evaluated the feasibility, outcomes, and safety of telehepatology in delivering quality care amid the pandemic. A telemedicine setup using smartphones by hepatologists was organized at our tertiary‐care center after pilot testing. Consecutive patients availing telehepatology services were recruited between March and July 2020. An adapted model for assessment of telemedicine was used after validity and reliability testing, to evaluate services 7‐21 days after index teleconsultation. Of the 1,419 registrations, 1,281 (90.3%) consultations were completed. From 245 randomly surveyed patients, 210 (85.7%) responded (age [years, interquartile range]: 46 [35‐56]; 32.3% females). Seventy percent of patients belonged to the middle or lower socio‐economic class, whereas 61% were from rural areas. Modes of teleconsultation were audio (54.3%) or hybrid video call (45.7%). Teleconsultation alone was deemed suitable in 88.6% of patients. Diagnosis and compliance rates were 94% and 82.4%, respectively. Patients’ convenience rate, satisfaction rate, improvement rate, success rate, and net promoter scores were 99.0%, 85.2%, 49.5%, 46.2% and 70, respectively. Physical and mental quality of life improved in 67.1% and 82.8% of patients, respectively, following index teleconsultation. Person‐hours and money spent by patients were significantly lower with teleconsultation (P < 0.001); however, person‐hours spent by hospital per teleconsultation were higher than in physical outpatient services (P < 0.001). Dissatisfied patients were more likely to have lower diagnosis rate, unsuitability for teleconsultation, noncompliance, poorer understanding, and uncomfortable conversation during teleconsultation. Connectivity issues (22.9%) were the most common barrier. Three patients, all of whom were advised emergency care during teleconsultation, succumbed to their illness. Conclusion: Telehepatology is a feasible and reasonably effective tool for rendering health care services using smartphones during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Systematic implementation, possible integration into routine health care delivery, and formal cost‐effectiveness of telehepatology services need further exploration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8251420/ /pubmed/34230904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1732 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Hepatology Communications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Verma, Nipun
Mishra, Saurabh
Singh, Surender
Kaur, Rajwant
Kaur, Talwinder
De, Arka
Premkumar, Madhumita
Taneja, Sunil
Duseja, Ajay
Singh, Meenu
Singh, Virendra
Feasibility, Outcomes, and Safety of Telehepatology Services During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
title Feasibility, Outcomes, and Safety of Telehepatology Services During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
title_full Feasibility, Outcomes, and Safety of Telehepatology Services During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
title_fullStr Feasibility, Outcomes, and Safety of Telehepatology Services During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility, Outcomes, and Safety of Telehepatology Services During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
title_short Feasibility, Outcomes, and Safety of Telehepatology Services During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
title_sort feasibility, outcomes, and safety of telehepatology services during the covid‐19 pandemic
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34230904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1732
work_keys_str_mv AT vermanipun feasibilityoutcomesandsafetyoftelehepatologyservicesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT mishrasaurabh feasibilityoutcomesandsafetyoftelehepatologyservicesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT singhsurender feasibilityoutcomesandsafetyoftelehepatologyservicesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT kaurrajwant feasibilityoutcomesandsafetyoftelehepatologyservicesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT kaurtalwinder feasibilityoutcomesandsafetyoftelehepatologyservicesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT dearka feasibilityoutcomesandsafetyoftelehepatologyservicesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT premkumarmadhumita feasibilityoutcomesandsafetyoftelehepatologyservicesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT tanejasunil feasibilityoutcomesandsafetyoftelehepatologyservicesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT dusejaajay feasibilityoutcomesandsafetyoftelehepatologyservicesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT singhmeenu feasibilityoutcomesandsafetyoftelehepatologyservicesduringthecovid19pandemic
AT singhvirendra feasibilityoutcomesandsafetyoftelehepatologyservicesduringthecovid19pandemic