Cargando…

Reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity‐ and contraction intensity‐dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties

“Flexibility” tests are traditionally performed voluntarily relaxed by rotating a joint slowly; however, functional activities are performed rapidly with voluntary/reflexive muscle activity. Here, we describe the reliabilities and differences in maximum ankle range of motion (ROM(max)) and plantar f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinto, Matheus D., Wilson, Cody J., Kay, Anthony D., Blazevich, Anthony J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33453060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.13920
_version_ 1783717106514132992
author Pinto, Matheus D.
Wilson, Cody J.
Kay, Anthony D.
Blazevich, Anthony J.
author_facet Pinto, Matheus D.
Wilson, Cody J.
Kay, Anthony D.
Blazevich, Anthony J.
author_sort Pinto, Matheus D.
collection PubMed
description “Flexibility” tests are traditionally performed voluntarily relaxed by rotating a joint slowly; however, functional activities are performed rapidly with voluntary/reflexive muscle activity. Here, we describe the reliabilities and differences in maximum ankle range of motion (ROM(max)) and plantar flexor mechanical properties at several velocities and levels of voluntary force from a new test protocol on a commercially available dynamometer. Fifteen participants had their ankle joint dorsiflexed at 5, 30, and 60° s(−1) in two conditions: voluntarily relaxed and while producing 40% and 60% of maximal eccentric torque. Commonly reported variables describing ROM(max) and resistance to stretch were subsequently calculated from torque and angle data. Absolute (coefficient of variation (CV%) and typical error) and relative (ICC(2,1)) reliabilities were determined across two testing days (≥72 h). ROM(max) relative reliability was good in voluntarily relaxed tests at 30 and 60° s(−1) and moderate at 5° s(−1), despite CVs ≤ 10% for all velocities. Tests performed with voluntary muscle activity were only reliable when performed at 5° s(−1), and ROM(max) reliability was moderate and CV ≤ 8%. For most variables, the rank order of participants differed between the slow‐velocity, relaxed test, and those performed at faster speeds or with voluntary activation, indicating different information. A person's flexibility status during voluntarily relaxed fast or active stretches tended to differ from their status in the traditional voluntarily relaxed, slow‐velocity test. Thus, “flexibility” tests should be completed under conditions of different stretch velocity and levels of muscle force production, and clinicians and researchers should consider the slightly larger between‐day variability from slow‐velocity voluntarily relaxed tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8251531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82515312021-07-06 Reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity‐ and contraction intensity‐dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties Pinto, Matheus D. Wilson, Cody J. Kay, Anthony D. Blazevich, Anthony J. Scand J Med Sci Sports Original Articles “Flexibility” tests are traditionally performed voluntarily relaxed by rotating a joint slowly; however, functional activities are performed rapidly with voluntary/reflexive muscle activity. Here, we describe the reliabilities and differences in maximum ankle range of motion (ROM(max)) and plantar flexor mechanical properties at several velocities and levels of voluntary force from a new test protocol on a commercially available dynamometer. Fifteen participants had their ankle joint dorsiflexed at 5, 30, and 60° s(−1) in two conditions: voluntarily relaxed and while producing 40% and 60% of maximal eccentric torque. Commonly reported variables describing ROM(max) and resistance to stretch were subsequently calculated from torque and angle data. Absolute (coefficient of variation (CV%) and typical error) and relative (ICC(2,1)) reliabilities were determined across two testing days (≥72 h). ROM(max) relative reliability was good in voluntarily relaxed tests at 30 and 60° s(−1) and moderate at 5° s(−1), despite CVs ≤ 10% for all velocities. Tests performed with voluntary muscle activity were only reliable when performed at 5° s(−1), and ROM(max) reliability was moderate and CV ≤ 8%. For most variables, the rank order of participants differed between the slow‐velocity, relaxed test, and those performed at faster speeds or with voluntary activation, indicating different information. A person's flexibility status during voluntarily relaxed fast or active stretches tended to differ from their status in the traditional voluntarily relaxed, slow‐velocity test. Thus, “flexibility” tests should be completed under conditions of different stretch velocity and levels of muscle force production, and clinicians and researchers should consider the slightly larger between‐day variability from slow‐velocity voluntarily relaxed tests. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-23 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8251531/ /pubmed/33453060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.13920 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science In Sports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pinto, Matheus D.
Wilson, Cody J.
Kay, Anthony D.
Blazevich, Anthony J.
Reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity‐ and contraction intensity‐dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties
title Reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity‐ and contraction intensity‐dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties
title_full Reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity‐ and contraction intensity‐dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties
title_fullStr Reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity‐ and contraction intensity‐dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity‐ and contraction intensity‐dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties
title_short Reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity‐ and contraction intensity‐dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties
title_sort reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity‐ and contraction intensity‐dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33453060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.13920
work_keys_str_mv AT pintomatheusd reliabilityofisokinetictestsofvelocityandcontractionintensitydependentplantarflexormechanicalproperties
AT wilsoncodyj reliabilityofisokinetictestsofvelocityandcontractionintensitydependentplantarflexormechanicalproperties
AT kayanthonyd reliabilityofisokinetictestsofvelocityandcontractionintensitydependentplantarflexormechanicalproperties
AT blazevichanthonyj reliabilityofisokinetictestsofvelocityandcontractionintensitydependentplantarflexormechanicalproperties