Cargando…

Randomised study: effects of the 5‐HT(4) receptor agonist felcisetrag vs placebo on gut transit in patients with gastroparesis

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is defined by delayed gastric emptying with associated symptoms in the absence of mechanical obstruction. AIM: To evaluate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of felcisetrag, a highly selective 5‐HT(4) receptor agonist, on total gut transit in patients with documented del...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chedid, Victor, Brandler, Justin, Arndt, Kayla, Vijayvargiya, Priya, Wang, Xiao Jing, Burton, Duane, Harmsen, W. Scott, Siegelman, Jenifer, Chen, Chunlin, Chen, Yinzhong, Almansa, Cristina, Dukes, George, Camilleri, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33711180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16304
_version_ 1783717108807368704
author Chedid, Victor
Brandler, Justin
Arndt, Kayla
Vijayvargiya, Priya
Wang, Xiao Jing
Burton, Duane
Harmsen, W. Scott
Siegelman, Jenifer
Chen, Chunlin
Chen, Yinzhong
Almansa, Cristina
Dukes, George
Camilleri, Michael
author_facet Chedid, Victor
Brandler, Justin
Arndt, Kayla
Vijayvargiya, Priya
Wang, Xiao Jing
Burton, Duane
Harmsen, W. Scott
Siegelman, Jenifer
Chen, Chunlin
Chen, Yinzhong
Almansa, Cristina
Dukes, George
Camilleri, Michael
author_sort Chedid, Victor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is defined by delayed gastric emptying with associated symptoms in the absence of mechanical obstruction. AIM: To evaluate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of felcisetrag, a highly selective 5‐HT(4) receptor agonist, on total gut transit in patients with documented delayed gastric emptying of solids. METHODS: Single‐centre, placebo‐controlled study of 36 participants receiving placebo, 0.1mg, 0.3mg or 1.0mg of felcisetrag I.V. infusion, daily, for 3 days. At baseline, each participant completed a 4h, (99m)Tc‐egg meal (300 kcal, 30% fat) gastric emptying test. Following infusion (Day 2), gastric, small bowel and colonic transit of solids were measured over 48h (same meal plus (111)In‐charcoal delivered in methacrylate‐coated capsule). Samples were collected for pharmacokinetics. The primary endpoint was gastric emptying T(1/2). Statistical analysis used baseline parameters as covariates (ANCOVA). RESULTS: Patients (22 idiopathic, 14 diabetic gastroparesis) were randomised to felcisetrag (0.1 mg, n = 10; 0.3 mg, n = 9; 1.0 mg, n = 7) or placebo (n = 10). Compared to placebo, felcisetrag significantly accelerated gastric emptying T (1/2), colonic filling at 6h, and 10% small bowel transit time (overall P < 0.01; all three doses individually Bonferroni corrected P < 0.05) for all three measurements. Ascending colon emptying (T (1/2)) was significantly accelerated (all doses), and colonic transit at 48 hours was accelerated with 0.1 mg and 0.3 mg felcisetrag compared to placebo. Pharmacokinetic results were dose proportional. Felcisetrag was well tolerated with no clinically significant findings from clinical laboratory, vital signs or ECG. CONCLUSION: I.V. felcisetrag significantly accelerated gastric, small bowel and colonic transit in patients with gastroparesis, and should be further evaluated for short‐term treatment of gastric and intestinal motility disorders. ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03281577
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8251541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82515412021-07-06 Randomised study: effects of the 5‐HT(4) receptor agonist felcisetrag vs placebo on gut transit in patients with gastroparesis Chedid, Victor Brandler, Justin Arndt, Kayla Vijayvargiya, Priya Wang, Xiao Jing Burton, Duane Harmsen, W. Scott Siegelman, Jenifer Chen, Chunlin Chen, Yinzhong Almansa, Cristina Dukes, George Camilleri, Michael Aliment Pharmacol Ther Randomised Clinical Trials BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is defined by delayed gastric emptying with associated symptoms in the absence of mechanical obstruction. AIM: To evaluate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of felcisetrag, a highly selective 5‐HT(4) receptor agonist, on total gut transit in patients with documented delayed gastric emptying of solids. METHODS: Single‐centre, placebo‐controlled study of 36 participants receiving placebo, 0.1mg, 0.3mg or 1.0mg of felcisetrag I.V. infusion, daily, for 3 days. At baseline, each participant completed a 4h, (99m)Tc‐egg meal (300 kcal, 30% fat) gastric emptying test. Following infusion (Day 2), gastric, small bowel and colonic transit of solids were measured over 48h (same meal plus (111)In‐charcoal delivered in methacrylate‐coated capsule). Samples were collected for pharmacokinetics. The primary endpoint was gastric emptying T(1/2). Statistical analysis used baseline parameters as covariates (ANCOVA). RESULTS: Patients (22 idiopathic, 14 diabetic gastroparesis) were randomised to felcisetrag (0.1 mg, n = 10; 0.3 mg, n = 9; 1.0 mg, n = 7) or placebo (n = 10). Compared to placebo, felcisetrag significantly accelerated gastric emptying T (1/2), colonic filling at 6h, and 10% small bowel transit time (overall P < 0.01; all three doses individually Bonferroni corrected P < 0.05) for all three measurements. Ascending colon emptying (T (1/2)) was significantly accelerated (all doses), and colonic transit at 48 hours was accelerated with 0.1 mg and 0.3 mg felcisetrag compared to placebo. Pharmacokinetic results were dose proportional. Felcisetrag was well tolerated with no clinically significant findings from clinical laboratory, vital signs or ECG. CONCLUSION: I.V. felcisetrag significantly accelerated gastric, small bowel and colonic transit in patients with gastroparesis, and should be further evaluated for short‐term treatment of gastric and intestinal motility disorders. ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03281577 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-12 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8251541/ /pubmed/33711180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16304 Text en © 2021 Mayo Foundation for Medical and Research. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Randomised Clinical Trials
Chedid, Victor
Brandler, Justin
Arndt, Kayla
Vijayvargiya, Priya
Wang, Xiao Jing
Burton, Duane
Harmsen, W. Scott
Siegelman, Jenifer
Chen, Chunlin
Chen, Yinzhong
Almansa, Cristina
Dukes, George
Camilleri, Michael
Randomised study: effects of the 5‐HT(4) receptor agonist felcisetrag vs placebo on gut transit in patients with gastroparesis
title Randomised study: effects of the 5‐HT(4) receptor agonist felcisetrag vs placebo on gut transit in patients with gastroparesis
title_full Randomised study: effects of the 5‐HT(4) receptor agonist felcisetrag vs placebo on gut transit in patients with gastroparesis
title_fullStr Randomised study: effects of the 5‐HT(4) receptor agonist felcisetrag vs placebo on gut transit in patients with gastroparesis
title_full_unstemmed Randomised study: effects of the 5‐HT(4) receptor agonist felcisetrag vs placebo on gut transit in patients with gastroparesis
title_short Randomised study: effects of the 5‐HT(4) receptor agonist felcisetrag vs placebo on gut transit in patients with gastroparesis
title_sort randomised study: effects of the 5‐ht(4) receptor agonist felcisetrag vs placebo on gut transit in patients with gastroparesis
topic Randomised Clinical Trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33711180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16304
work_keys_str_mv AT chedidvictor randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT brandlerjustin randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT arndtkayla randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT vijayvargiyapriya randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT wangxiaojing randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT burtonduane randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT harmsenwscott randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT siegelmanjenifer randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT chenchunlin randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT chenyinzhong randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT almansacristina randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT dukesgeorge randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis
AT camillerimichael randomisedstudyeffectsofthe5ht4receptoragonistfelcisetragvsplaceboonguttransitinpatientswithgastroparesis