Cargando…
Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children?
OBJECTIVES: Fixation preference testing is widely used to detect amblyopia, particularly in preverbal children. Pattern electroretinogram (pERG) is an electrophysiological test which is a sensitive indicator of macular function. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between fixat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187148 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.41524 |
_version_ | 1783717134741798912 |
---|---|
author | Taylan Şekeroğlu, Hande Bilgiç, Ahmet Alp Karakaya, Jale |
author_facet | Taylan Şekeroğlu, Hande Bilgiç, Ahmet Alp Karakaya, Jale |
author_sort | Taylan Şekeroğlu, Hande |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Fixation preference testing is widely used to detect amblyopia, particularly in preverbal children. Pattern electroretinogram (pERG) is an electrophysiological test which is a sensitive indicator of macular function. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between fixation preference and macular function on pERG in children with strabismus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 11 children with strabismus. All underwent ophthalmological examination including fixation preference by binocular fixation pattern test, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessment, and pERG. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 10.09±1.18 years. All patients had unilateral fixation. The mean BCVA was 0.85±0.17 in preferred and 0.48±0.19 in non-preferred eyes (p=0.003). The mean p50 amplitude was 6.07±2.06 μV in preferred and 5.29±2.20 μV in non-preferred eyes (p=0.203), and the mean N95 amplitude was 8.27±2.86 μV and 8.03±3.24 μV respectively (p=0.594). BCVA was correlated with p50 and N95 amplitudes in the non-preferred eyes (p=0.023 and p=0.014). Interocular BCVA difference was correlated with interocular P50 amplitude difference (r=0.688, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: Although amblyopia is typically considered a cortical phenomenon, future larger studies are needed to investigate the relationship between fixation preference and macular electrophysiological function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8251667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82516672021-07-13 Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children? Taylan Şekeroğlu, Hande Bilgiç, Ahmet Alp Karakaya, Jale Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Fixation preference testing is widely used to detect amblyopia, particularly in preverbal children. Pattern electroretinogram (pERG) is an electrophysiological test which is a sensitive indicator of macular function. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between fixation preference and macular function on pERG in children with strabismus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 11 children with strabismus. All underwent ophthalmological examination including fixation preference by binocular fixation pattern test, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessment, and pERG. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 10.09±1.18 years. All patients had unilateral fixation. The mean BCVA was 0.85±0.17 in preferred and 0.48±0.19 in non-preferred eyes (p=0.003). The mean p50 amplitude was 6.07±2.06 μV in preferred and 5.29±2.20 μV in non-preferred eyes (p=0.203), and the mean N95 amplitude was 8.27±2.86 μV and 8.03±3.24 μV respectively (p=0.594). BCVA was correlated with p50 and N95 amplitudes in the non-preferred eyes (p=0.023 and p=0.014). Interocular BCVA difference was correlated with interocular P50 amplitude difference (r=0.688, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: Although amblyopia is typically considered a cortical phenomenon, future larger studies are needed to investigate the relationship between fixation preference and macular electrophysiological function. Galenos Publishing 2021-06 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8251667/ /pubmed/34187148 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.41524 Text en © Copyright 2021 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Taylan Şekeroğlu, Hande Bilgiç, Ahmet Alp Karakaya, Jale Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children? |
title | Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children? |
title_full | Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children? |
title_fullStr | Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children? |
title_short | Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children? |
title_sort | is fixation preference a potential indicator of macular function in children? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187148 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.41524 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylansekerogluhande isfixationpreferenceapotentialindicatorofmacularfunctioninchildren AT bilgicahmetalp isfixationpreferenceapotentialindicatorofmacularfunctioninchildren AT karakayajale isfixationpreferenceapotentialindicatorofmacularfunctioninchildren |