Cargando…

Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children?

OBJECTIVES: Fixation preference testing is widely used to detect amblyopia, particularly in preverbal children. Pattern electroretinogram (pERG) is an electrophysiological test which is a sensitive indicator of macular function. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between fixat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylan Şekeroğlu, Hande, Bilgiç, Ahmet Alp, Karakaya, Jale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187148
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.41524
_version_ 1783717134741798912
author Taylan Şekeroğlu, Hande
Bilgiç, Ahmet Alp
Karakaya, Jale
author_facet Taylan Şekeroğlu, Hande
Bilgiç, Ahmet Alp
Karakaya, Jale
author_sort Taylan Şekeroğlu, Hande
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Fixation preference testing is widely used to detect amblyopia, particularly in preverbal children. Pattern electroretinogram (pERG) is an electrophysiological test which is a sensitive indicator of macular function. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between fixation preference and macular function on pERG in children with strabismus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 11 children with strabismus. All underwent ophthalmological examination including fixation preference by binocular fixation pattern test, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessment, and pERG. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 10.09±1.18 years. All patients had unilateral fixation. The mean BCVA was 0.85±0.17 in preferred and 0.48±0.19 in non-preferred eyes (p=0.003). The mean p50 amplitude was 6.07±2.06 μV in preferred and 5.29±2.20 μV in non-preferred eyes (p=0.203), and the mean N95 amplitude was 8.27±2.86 μV and 8.03±3.24 μV respectively (p=0.594). BCVA was correlated with p50 and N95 amplitudes in the non-preferred eyes (p=0.023 and p=0.014). Interocular BCVA difference was correlated with interocular P50 amplitude difference (r=0.688, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: Although amblyopia is typically considered a cortical phenomenon, future larger studies are needed to investigate the relationship between fixation preference and macular electrophysiological function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8251667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82516672021-07-13 Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children? Taylan Şekeroğlu, Hande Bilgiç, Ahmet Alp Karakaya, Jale Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Fixation preference testing is widely used to detect amblyopia, particularly in preverbal children. Pattern electroretinogram (pERG) is an electrophysiological test which is a sensitive indicator of macular function. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between fixation preference and macular function on pERG in children with strabismus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 11 children with strabismus. All underwent ophthalmological examination including fixation preference by binocular fixation pattern test, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessment, and pERG. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 10.09±1.18 years. All patients had unilateral fixation. The mean BCVA was 0.85±0.17 in preferred and 0.48±0.19 in non-preferred eyes (p=0.003). The mean p50 amplitude was 6.07±2.06 μV in preferred and 5.29±2.20 μV in non-preferred eyes (p=0.203), and the mean N95 amplitude was 8.27±2.86 μV and 8.03±3.24 μV respectively (p=0.594). BCVA was correlated with p50 and N95 amplitudes in the non-preferred eyes (p=0.023 and p=0.014). Interocular BCVA difference was correlated with interocular P50 amplitude difference (r=0.688, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: Although amblyopia is typically considered a cortical phenomenon, future larger studies are needed to investigate the relationship between fixation preference and macular electrophysiological function. Galenos Publishing 2021-06 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8251667/ /pubmed/34187148 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.41524 Text en © Copyright 2021 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Taylan Şekeroğlu, Hande
Bilgiç, Ahmet Alp
Karakaya, Jale
Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children?
title Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children?
title_full Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children?
title_fullStr Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children?
title_full_unstemmed Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children?
title_short Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children?
title_sort is fixation preference a potential indicator of macular function in children?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34187148
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.41524
work_keys_str_mv AT taylansekerogluhande isfixationpreferenceapotentialindicatorofmacularfunctioninchildren
AT bilgicahmetalp isfixationpreferenceapotentialindicatorofmacularfunctioninchildren
AT karakayajale isfixationpreferenceapotentialindicatorofmacularfunctioninchildren