Cargando…

Clinical outcomes, management, and treatment patterns in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with radium‐223 in community compared to academic settings

BACKGROUND: The most common site of disease in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is the bone. The ALSYMPCA study demonstrated that radium‐223 significantly improved overall survival (OS) in mCRPC patients with symptomatic bone metastases and without visceral metastases. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sartor, Oliver, Appukkuttan, Sreevalsa, Weiss, Jeffrey, Tsao, Che‐Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33978244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pros.24143
_version_ 1783717174252142592
author Sartor, Oliver
Appukkuttan, Sreevalsa
Weiss, Jeffrey
Tsao, Che‐Kai
author_facet Sartor, Oliver
Appukkuttan, Sreevalsa
Weiss, Jeffrey
Tsao, Che‐Kai
author_sort Sartor, Oliver
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most common site of disease in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is the bone. The ALSYMPCA study demonstrated that radium‐223 significantly improved overall survival (OS) in mCRPC patients with symptomatic bone metastases and without visceral metastases. However, administration requires a multidisciplinary approach and an infrastructure that supports coordination of care, which may differ by practice site. We aimed to evaluate practice patterns and treatment outcomes in patients with mCRPC treated at a community practice (CP) compared with those treated at an academic center (AC). METHODS: This retrospective review included 200 adult mCRPC patients receiving radium‐223 between January 2014 and June 2017. The primary endpoint, OS, was estimated from the date of radium‐223 initiation. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of baseline characteristics, reasons for initiation and discontinuation of radium‐223, and treatment sequencing. A subset analysis of OS based on the number of radium‐223 doses and on sequencing of radium‐223 either before or after chemotherapy was also conducted. RESULTS: Most patients were treated at a CP (57%). Patients treated at CP sites were significantly older (74.9 vs. 71.9 years; p = .031) and had more comorbidities (Klabunde score 1.1 vs. 0.7; p = .020) than those in an AC but initiated treatment within a shorter period of time from diagnosis of mCRPC (1.3 vs. 1.9 years; p < .001) and received a greater mean number of radium‐223 doses (5.4 vs. 4.8; p = .001). There were no observed differences in OS between CPs versus ACs (21.6 vs. 20.7 months; p = .306). Overall, patients who received 5–6 doses versus 1–4 doses of radium‐223 had a longer median OS (23.3 vs. 6.4 months; p < .001). The most common reason for discontinuation in patients who did not complete treatment was disease progression. Overall, 43% of patients received radium‐223 monotherapy and 57% concurrently with other agents. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients received radium‐223 concurrently with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide and were able to complete 5–6 doses of radium‐223. Despite differences in the populations and treatment patterns, no survival differences between patients treated in ACs versus CPs were observed. Additional real‐world data are needed to validate these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8251844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82518442021-07-07 Clinical outcomes, management, and treatment patterns in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with radium‐223 in community compared to academic settings Sartor, Oliver Appukkuttan, Sreevalsa Weiss, Jeffrey Tsao, Che‐Kai Prostate Original Articles BACKGROUND: The most common site of disease in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is the bone. The ALSYMPCA study demonstrated that radium‐223 significantly improved overall survival (OS) in mCRPC patients with symptomatic bone metastases and without visceral metastases. However, administration requires a multidisciplinary approach and an infrastructure that supports coordination of care, which may differ by practice site. We aimed to evaluate practice patterns and treatment outcomes in patients with mCRPC treated at a community practice (CP) compared with those treated at an academic center (AC). METHODS: This retrospective review included 200 adult mCRPC patients receiving radium‐223 between January 2014 and June 2017. The primary endpoint, OS, was estimated from the date of radium‐223 initiation. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of baseline characteristics, reasons for initiation and discontinuation of radium‐223, and treatment sequencing. A subset analysis of OS based on the number of radium‐223 doses and on sequencing of radium‐223 either before or after chemotherapy was also conducted. RESULTS: Most patients were treated at a CP (57%). Patients treated at CP sites were significantly older (74.9 vs. 71.9 years; p = .031) and had more comorbidities (Klabunde score 1.1 vs. 0.7; p = .020) than those in an AC but initiated treatment within a shorter period of time from diagnosis of mCRPC (1.3 vs. 1.9 years; p < .001) and received a greater mean number of radium‐223 doses (5.4 vs. 4.8; p = .001). There were no observed differences in OS between CPs versus ACs (21.6 vs. 20.7 months; p = .306). Overall, patients who received 5–6 doses versus 1–4 doses of radium‐223 had a longer median OS (23.3 vs. 6.4 months; p < .001). The most common reason for discontinuation in patients who did not complete treatment was disease progression. Overall, 43% of patients received radium‐223 monotherapy and 57% concurrently with other agents. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients received radium‐223 concurrently with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide and were able to complete 5–6 doses of radium‐223. Despite differences in the populations and treatment patterns, no survival differences between patients treated in ACs versus CPs were observed. Additional real‐world data are needed to validate these findings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-12 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8251844/ /pubmed/33978244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pros.24143 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Prostate Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sartor, Oliver
Appukkuttan, Sreevalsa
Weiss, Jeffrey
Tsao, Che‐Kai
Clinical outcomes, management, and treatment patterns in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with radium‐223 in community compared to academic settings
title Clinical outcomes, management, and treatment patterns in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with radium‐223 in community compared to academic settings
title_full Clinical outcomes, management, and treatment patterns in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with radium‐223 in community compared to academic settings
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes, management, and treatment patterns in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with radium‐223 in community compared to academic settings
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes, management, and treatment patterns in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with radium‐223 in community compared to academic settings
title_short Clinical outcomes, management, and treatment patterns in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with radium‐223 in community compared to academic settings
title_sort clinical outcomes, management, and treatment patterns in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer treated with radium‐223 in community compared to academic settings
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33978244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pros.24143
work_keys_str_mv AT sartoroliver clinicaloutcomesmanagementandtreatmentpatternsinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223incommunitycomparedtoacademicsettings
AT appukkuttansreevalsa clinicaloutcomesmanagementandtreatmentpatternsinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223incommunitycomparedtoacademicsettings
AT weissjeffrey clinicaloutcomesmanagementandtreatmentpatternsinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223incommunitycomparedtoacademicsettings
AT tsaochekai clinicaloutcomesmanagementandtreatmentpatternsinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancertreatedwithradium223incommunitycomparedtoacademicsettings