Cargando…
A catalogue of PROMs in sports science: Quality assessment of PROM development and validation
Choosing the most adequate PROM for a study is a non‐trivial process. The aim of this study was to provide a catalogue with analyses of content and construct validity of PROMs relevant to research in sports science, including all published local translations. The most commonly used PROMs in sports r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.13923 |
_version_ | 1783717194913284096 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Christian F. Jensen, Jonas Siersma, Volkert Brodersen, John Comins, Jonathan D. Krogsgaard, Michael R. |
author_facet | Hansen, Christian F. Jensen, Jonas Siersma, Volkert Brodersen, John Comins, Jonathan D. Krogsgaard, Michael R. |
author_sort | Hansen, Christian F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Choosing the most adequate PROM for a study is a non‐trivial process. The aim of this study was to provide a catalogue with analyses of content and construct validity of PROMs relevant to research in sports science, including all published local translations. The most commonly used PROMs in sports research were selected from a PubMed search “patient reported outcome measures sports”, identifying 439 articles and 194 different PROMs. Articles describing development of the 61 selected PROMs were assessed for content validity, and all articles regarding construct validity of each PROM and all published translations (in total 622 articles) were analyzed. A catalogue with assessments of the 61 PROMs was produced. The majority were of inferior validity, with few exceptions. The most common reason for this was that the PROM had not been developed by methods that ensure high content validity. Another major reason for inferior validity was that construct validity had not been secured by adequate statistical methods. In conclusion, this catalogue provides a tool for researchers to facilitate choosing the most valid PROM for studies in sports research. Furthermore, it shows for popular PROMs where further validation is needed, and for fields in musculoskeletal medicine where valid PROMs are lacking. It is suggested that a targeted effort is made to develop valid PROMs for major conditions in musculoskeletal research. The current method is easier to practice compared with assessment after COSMIN guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8251933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82519332021-07-07 A catalogue of PROMs in sports science: Quality assessment of PROM development and validation Hansen, Christian F. Jensen, Jonas Siersma, Volkert Brodersen, John Comins, Jonathan D. Krogsgaard, Michael R. Scand J Med Sci Sports Original Articles Choosing the most adequate PROM for a study is a non‐trivial process. The aim of this study was to provide a catalogue with analyses of content and construct validity of PROMs relevant to research in sports science, including all published local translations. The most commonly used PROMs in sports research were selected from a PubMed search “patient reported outcome measures sports”, identifying 439 articles and 194 different PROMs. Articles describing development of the 61 selected PROMs were assessed for content validity, and all articles regarding construct validity of each PROM and all published translations (in total 622 articles) were analyzed. A catalogue with assessments of the 61 PROMs was produced. The majority were of inferior validity, with few exceptions. The most common reason for this was that the PROM had not been developed by methods that ensure high content validity. Another major reason for inferior validity was that construct validity had not been secured by adequate statistical methods. In conclusion, this catalogue provides a tool for researchers to facilitate choosing the most valid PROM for studies in sports research. Furthermore, it shows for popular PROMs where further validation is needed, and for fields in musculoskeletal medicine where valid PROMs are lacking. It is suggested that a targeted effort is made to develop valid PROMs for major conditions in musculoskeletal research. The current method is easier to practice compared with assessment after COSMIN guidelines. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-04 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8251933/ /pubmed/33464661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.13923 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science In Sports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hansen, Christian F. Jensen, Jonas Siersma, Volkert Brodersen, John Comins, Jonathan D. Krogsgaard, Michael R. A catalogue of PROMs in sports science: Quality assessment of PROM development and validation |
title | A catalogue of PROMs in sports science: Quality assessment of PROM development and validation |
title_full | A catalogue of PROMs in sports science: Quality assessment of PROM development and validation |
title_fullStr | A catalogue of PROMs in sports science: Quality assessment of PROM development and validation |
title_full_unstemmed | A catalogue of PROMs in sports science: Quality assessment of PROM development and validation |
title_short | A catalogue of PROMs in sports science: Quality assessment of PROM development and validation |
title_sort | catalogue of proms in sports science: quality assessment of prom development and validation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.13923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenchristianf acatalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation AT jensenjonas acatalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation AT siersmavolkert acatalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation AT brodersenjohn acatalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation AT cominsjonathand acatalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation AT krogsgaardmichaelr acatalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation AT hansenchristianf catalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation AT jensenjonas catalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation AT siersmavolkert catalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation AT brodersenjohn catalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation AT cominsjonathand catalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation AT krogsgaardmichaelr catalogueofpromsinsportssciencequalityassessmentofpromdevelopmentandvalidation |