Cargando…
Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens
Variation in selfing rates within and among populations of hermaphroditic flowering plants can strongly influence the evolution of reproductive strategies and the genetic structure of populations. This intraspecific variation in mating patterns may reflect both genetic and ecological factors, but th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13781 |
_version_ | 1783717222911311872 |
---|---|
author | Christopher, Dorothy A. Karron, Jeffrey D. Semski, Wendy R. Smallwood, Patrick A. Trapnell, Dorset W. Mitchell, Randall J. |
author_facet | Christopher, Dorothy A. Karron, Jeffrey D. Semski, Wendy R. Smallwood, Patrick A. Trapnell, Dorset W. Mitchell, Randall J. |
author_sort | Christopher, Dorothy A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Variation in selfing rates within and among populations of hermaphroditic flowering plants can strongly influence the evolution of reproductive strategies and the genetic structure of populations. This intraspecific variation in mating patterns may reflect both genetic and ecological factors, but the relative importance of these factors remains poorly understood. Here, we explore how selfing in 13 natural populations of the perennial wildflower Mimulus ringens is influenced by (a) pollinator visitation, an ecological factor, and (b) floral display, a trait with a genetic component that also responds to environmental variation. We also explore whether genetically based floral traits, including herkogamy, affect selfing. We found substantial variation among populations in selfing rate (0.13–0.55). Selfing increased strongly and significantly with floral display, among as well as within populations. Selfing also increased at sites with lower pollinator visitation and low plant density. However, selfing was not correlated with floral morphology. Overall, these results suggest that pollinator visitation and floral display, two factors that interact to affect geitonogamous pollinator movements, can influence the selfing rate. This study identifies mechanisms that may play a role in maintaining selfing rate variation among populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8252063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82520632021-07-07 Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens Christopher, Dorothy A. Karron, Jeffrey D. Semski, Wendy R. Smallwood, Patrick A. Trapnell, Dorset W. Mitchell, Randall J. J Evol Biol Research Papers Variation in selfing rates within and among populations of hermaphroditic flowering plants can strongly influence the evolution of reproductive strategies and the genetic structure of populations. This intraspecific variation in mating patterns may reflect both genetic and ecological factors, but the relative importance of these factors remains poorly understood. Here, we explore how selfing in 13 natural populations of the perennial wildflower Mimulus ringens is influenced by (a) pollinator visitation, an ecological factor, and (b) floral display, a trait with a genetic component that also responds to environmental variation. We also explore whether genetically based floral traits, including herkogamy, affect selfing. We found substantial variation among populations in selfing rate (0.13–0.55). Selfing increased strongly and significantly with floral display, among as well as within populations. Selfing also increased at sites with lower pollinator visitation and low plant density. However, selfing was not correlated with floral morphology. Overall, these results suggest that pollinator visitation and floral display, two factors that interact to affect geitonogamous pollinator movements, can influence the selfing rate. This study identifies mechanisms that may play a role in maintaining selfing rate variation among populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-27 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8252063/ /pubmed/33704852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13781 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Christopher, Dorothy A. Karron, Jeffrey D. Semski, Wendy R. Smallwood, Patrick A. Trapnell, Dorset W. Mitchell, Randall J. Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens |
title | Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus
ringens
|
title_full | Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus
ringens
|
title_fullStr | Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus
ringens
|
title_full_unstemmed | Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus
ringens
|
title_short | Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus
ringens
|
title_sort | selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of mimulus
ringens |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13781 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christopherdorothya selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens AT karronjeffreyd selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens AT semskiwendyr selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens AT smallwoodpatricka selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens AT trapnelldorsetw selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens AT mitchellrandallj selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens |