Cargando…

Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens

Variation in selfing rates within and among populations of hermaphroditic flowering plants can strongly influence the evolution of reproductive strategies and the genetic structure of populations. This intraspecific variation in mating patterns may reflect both genetic and ecological factors, but th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christopher, Dorothy A., Karron, Jeffrey D., Semski, Wendy R., Smallwood, Patrick A., Trapnell, Dorset W., Mitchell, Randall J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13781
_version_ 1783717222911311872
author Christopher, Dorothy A.
Karron, Jeffrey D.
Semski, Wendy R.
Smallwood, Patrick A.
Trapnell, Dorset W.
Mitchell, Randall J.
author_facet Christopher, Dorothy A.
Karron, Jeffrey D.
Semski, Wendy R.
Smallwood, Patrick A.
Trapnell, Dorset W.
Mitchell, Randall J.
author_sort Christopher, Dorothy A.
collection PubMed
description Variation in selfing rates within and among populations of hermaphroditic flowering plants can strongly influence the evolution of reproductive strategies and the genetic structure of populations. This intraspecific variation in mating patterns may reflect both genetic and ecological factors, but the relative importance of these factors remains poorly understood. Here, we explore how selfing in 13 natural populations of the perennial wildflower Mimulus ringens is influenced by (a) pollinator visitation, an ecological factor, and (b) floral display, a trait with a genetic component that also responds to environmental variation. We also explore whether genetically based floral traits, including herkogamy, affect selfing. We found substantial variation among populations in selfing rate (0.13–0.55). Selfing increased strongly and significantly with floral display, among as well as within populations. Selfing also increased at sites with lower pollinator visitation and low plant density. However, selfing was not correlated with floral morphology. Overall, these results suggest that pollinator visitation and floral display, two factors that interact to affect geitonogamous pollinator movements, can influence the selfing rate. This study identifies mechanisms that may play a role in maintaining selfing rate variation among populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8252063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82520632021-07-07 Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens Christopher, Dorothy A. Karron, Jeffrey D. Semski, Wendy R. Smallwood, Patrick A. Trapnell, Dorset W. Mitchell, Randall J. J Evol Biol Research Papers Variation in selfing rates within and among populations of hermaphroditic flowering plants can strongly influence the evolution of reproductive strategies and the genetic structure of populations. This intraspecific variation in mating patterns may reflect both genetic and ecological factors, but the relative importance of these factors remains poorly understood. Here, we explore how selfing in 13 natural populations of the perennial wildflower Mimulus ringens is influenced by (a) pollinator visitation, an ecological factor, and (b) floral display, a trait with a genetic component that also responds to environmental variation. We also explore whether genetically based floral traits, including herkogamy, affect selfing. We found substantial variation among populations in selfing rate (0.13–0.55). Selfing increased strongly and significantly with floral display, among as well as within populations. Selfing also increased at sites with lower pollinator visitation and low plant density. However, selfing was not correlated with floral morphology. Overall, these results suggest that pollinator visitation and floral display, two factors that interact to affect geitonogamous pollinator movements, can influence the selfing rate. This study identifies mechanisms that may play a role in maintaining selfing rate variation among populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-27 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8252063/ /pubmed/33704852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13781 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Christopher, Dorothy A.
Karron, Jeffrey D.
Semski, Wendy R.
Smallwood, Patrick A.
Trapnell, Dorset W.
Mitchell, Randall J.
Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens
title Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens
title_full Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens
title_fullStr Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens
title_full_unstemmed Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens
title_short Selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of Mimulus ringens
title_sort selfing rates vary with floral display, pollinator visitation and plant density in natural populations of mimulus ringens
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13781
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherdorothya selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens
AT karronjeffreyd selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens
AT semskiwendyr selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens
AT smallwoodpatricka selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens
AT trapnelldorsetw selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens
AT mitchellrandallj selfingratesvarywithfloraldisplaypollinatorvisitationandplantdensityinnaturalpopulationsofmimulusringens