Cargando…
Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation
BACKGROUND: This study focuses on (i) the length of the intraosseous part of the supraacetabular pin using the insertion technique from the spina iliaca anterior inferior to the cortical part of the incisura ischiadica major, (ii) the angle of insertion of the supraacetabular pin in the transversal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33734540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.16694 |
_version_ | 1783717225562112000 |
---|---|
author | Krassnig, Renate Hohenberger, Gloria M. Schimmerl, Paul Schwarz, Angelika Pichler, Wolfgang Puchwein, Paul Wildburger, Renate |
author_facet | Krassnig, Renate Hohenberger, Gloria M. Schimmerl, Paul Schwarz, Angelika Pichler, Wolfgang Puchwein, Paul Wildburger, Renate |
author_sort | Krassnig, Renate |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study focuses on (i) the length of the intraosseous part of the supraacetabular pin using the insertion technique from the spina iliaca anterior inferior to the cortical part of the incisura ischiadica major, (ii) the angle of insertion of the supraacetabular pin in the transversal plane and (iii) gender‐specific differences of the measured results. METHODS: Images of uninjured pelves from 49 patients (64‐line computed tomography scanner) were evaluated, and virtual external fixator pins were positioned using a three‐dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans. The length of the pins and the insertion angle were investigated. Descriptive statistics were used, and gender‐specific differences were calculated. A P‐value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The results showed significant differences between male and female pelves concerning both pin length and insertion angel. For male pelves, the mean screw length was 82.7 mm (SD 5.1; range 72.9–94.3). For females, this was statistically significantly shorter (P ≤ 0.001), with an average of 74.1 mm (SD 5.0; range 63.1–81.9). In the male subgroup, the insertion angle was a mean of 22.6° (SD 3.4; range 12.4–31.8), and the female pelves had an average angle of 19.7° (SD 4.0; range 11.7–24.5). These values differed statistically significantly (P = 0.0032). CONCLUSION: Based on our measurements, we can confirm that both the length of the Schanz screws and the angle of insertion for the supraacetabular external fixator show a statistically significant difference between males and females. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8252075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82520752021-07-07 Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation Krassnig, Renate Hohenberger, Gloria M. Schimmerl, Paul Schwarz, Angelika Pichler, Wolfgang Puchwein, Paul Wildburger, Renate ANZ J Surg Orthopaedic Surgery BACKGROUND: This study focuses on (i) the length of the intraosseous part of the supraacetabular pin using the insertion technique from the spina iliaca anterior inferior to the cortical part of the incisura ischiadica major, (ii) the angle of insertion of the supraacetabular pin in the transversal plane and (iii) gender‐specific differences of the measured results. METHODS: Images of uninjured pelves from 49 patients (64‐line computed tomography scanner) were evaluated, and virtual external fixator pins were positioned using a three‐dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans. The length of the pins and the insertion angle were investigated. Descriptive statistics were used, and gender‐specific differences were calculated. A P‐value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The results showed significant differences between male and female pelves concerning both pin length and insertion angel. For male pelves, the mean screw length was 82.7 mm (SD 5.1; range 72.9–94.3). For females, this was statistically significantly shorter (P ≤ 0.001), with an average of 74.1 mm (SD 5.0; range 63.1–81.9). In the male subgroup, the insertion angle was a mean of 22.6° (SD 3.4; range 12.4–31.8), and the female pelves had an average angle of 19.7° (SD 4.0; range 11.7–24.5). These values differed statistically significantly (P = 0.0032). CONCLUSION: Based on our measurements, we can confirm that both the length of the Schanz screws and the angle of insertion for the supraacetabular external fixator show a statistically significant difference between males and females. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-03-18 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8252075/ /pubmed/33734540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.16694 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Orthopaedic Surgery Krassnig, Renate Hohenberger, Gloria M. Schimmerl, Paul Schwarz, Angelika Pichler, Wolfgang Puchwein, Paul Wildburger, Renate Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation |
title | Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation |
title_full | Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation |
title_fullStr | Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation |
title_short | Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation |
title_sort | optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation |
topic | Orthopaedic Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33734540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.16694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krassnigrenate optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation AT hohenbergergloriam optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation AT schimmerlpaul optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation AT schwarzangelika optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation AT pichlerwolfgang optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation AT puchweinpaul optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation AT wildburgerrenate optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation |