Cargando…

Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation

BACKGROUND: This study focuses on (i) the length of the intraosseous part of the supraacetabular pin using the insertion technique from the spina iliaca anterior inferior to the cortical part of the incisura ischiadica major, (ii) the angle of insertion of the supraacetabular pin in the transversal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krassnig, Renate, Hohenberger, Gloria M., Schimmerl, Paul, Schwarz, Angelika, Pichler, Wolfgang, Puchwein, Paul, Wildburger, Renate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33734540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.16694
_version_ 1783717225562112000
author Krassnig, Renate
Hohenberger, Gloria M.
Schimmerl, Paul
Schwarz, Angelika
Pichler, Wolfgang
Puchwein, Paul
Wildburger, Renate
author_facet Krassnig, Renate
Hohenberger, Gloria M.
Schimmerl, Paul
Schwarz, Angelika
Pichler, Wolfgang
Puchwein, Paul
Wildburger, Renate
author_sort Krassnig, Renate
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study focuses on (i) the length of the intraosseous part of the supraacetabular pin using the insertion technique from the spina iliaca anterior inferior to the cortical part of the incisura ischiadica major, (ii) the angle of insertion of the supraacetabular pin in the transversal plane and (iii) gender‐specific differences of the measured results. METHODS: Images of uninjured pelves from 49 patients (64‐line computed tomography scanner) were evaluated, and virtual external fixator pins were positioned using a three‐dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans. The length of the pins and the insertion angle were investigated. Descriptive statistics were used, and gender‐specific differences were calculated. A P‐value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The results showed significant differences between male and female pelves concerning both pin length and insertion angel. For male pelves, the mean screw length was 82.7 mm (SD 5.1; range 72.9–94.3). For females, this was statistically significantly shorter (P ≤ 0.001), with an average of 74.1 mm (SD 5.0; range 63.1–81.9). In the male subgroup, the insertion angle was a mean of 22.6° (SD 3.4; range 12.4–31.8), and the female pelves had an average angle of 19.7° (SD 4.0; range 11.7–24.5). These values differed statistically significantly (P = 0.0032). CONCLUSION: Based on our measurements, we can confirm that both the length of the Schanz screws and the angle of insertion for the supraacetabular external fixator show a statistically significant difference between males and females.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8252075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82520752021-07-07 Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation Krassnig, Renate Hohenberger, Gloria M. Schimmerl, Paul Schwarz, Angelika Pichler, Wolfgang Puchwein, Paul Wildburger, Renate ANZ J Surg Orthopaedic Surgery BACKGROUND: This study focuses on (i) the length of the intraosseous part of the supraacetabular pin using the insertion technique from the spina iliaca anterior inferior to the cortical part of the incisura ischiadica major, (ii) the angle of insertion of the supraacetabular pin in the transversal plane and (iii) gender‐specific differences of the measured results. METHODS: Images of uninjured pelves from 49 patients (64‐line computed tomography scanner) were evaluated, and virtual external fixator pins were positioned using a three‐dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans. The length of the pins and the insertion angle were investigated. Descriptive statistics were used, and gender‐specific differences were calculated. A P‐value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The results showed significant differences between male and female pelves concerning both pin length and insertion angel. For male pelves, the mean screw length was 82.7 mm (SD 5.1; range 72.9–94.3). For females, this was statistically significantly shorter (P ≤ 0.001), with an average of 74.1 mm (SD 5.0; range 63.1–81.9). In the male subgroup, the insertion angle was a mean of 22.6° (SD 3.4; range 12.4–31.8), and the female pelves had an average angle of 19.7° (SD 4.0; range 11.7–24.5). These values differed statistically significantly (P = 0.0032). CONCLUSION: Based on our measurements, we can confirm that both the length of the Schanz screws and the angle of insertion for the supraacetabular external fixator show a statistically significant difference between males and females. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-03-18 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8252075/ /pubmed/33734540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.16694 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Orthopaedic Surgery
Krassnig, Renate
Hohenberger, Gloria M.
Schimmerl, Paul
Schwarz, Angelika
Pichler, Wolfgang
Puchwein, Paul
Wildburger, Renate
Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation
title Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation
title_full Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation
title_fullStr Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation
title_full_unstemmed Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation
title_short Optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation
title_sort optimal pin position in supraacetabular external fixation
topic Orthopaedic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33734540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.16694
work_keys_str_mv AT krassnigrenate optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation
AT hohenbergergloriam optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation
AT schimmerlpaul optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation
AT schwarzangelika optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation
AT pichlerwolfgang optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation
AT puchweinpaul optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation
AT wildburgerrenate optimalpinpositioninsupraacetabularexternalfixation