Cargando…

A novel azelaic acid formulation for the topical treatment of inflammatory rosacea: A multicentre, prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Topical azelaic acid (AzA) is a common treatment for mild/moderate inflammatory rosacea. AIMS: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of a novel formulation cream containing 15% AzA (anti‐inflammatory/anti‐oxidant/anti‐microbial agent) combined with 1% dihydroavenanthramide D (anti‐infl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dall’Oglio, Federica, Tedeschi, Aurora, Lacarrubba, Francesco, Fabbrocini, Gabriella, Skroza, Nevena, Chiodini, Paolo, Micali, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14098
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Topical azelaic acid (AzA) is a common treatment for mild/moderate inflammatory rosacea. AIMS: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of a novel formulation cream containing 15% AzA (anti‐inflammatory/anti‐oxidant/anti‐microbial agent) combined with 1% dihydroavenanthramide D (anti‐inflammatory/anti‐itch) in inflammatory rosacea using clinical/instrumental evaluation. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, open‐label trial, 45 patients with mild/moderate inflammatory rosacea enrolled at the Dermatology Clinic of the University of Catania, Naples, and Rome (Italy) were instructed to apply the cream twice daily for 8 weeks. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline (T0) and at 8 weeks (T1) by (1) Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score based on a 5‐point scale (from 0 = clear/no erythema/papules/pustules to 4 = severe erythema/several papules/pustules) and (2) inflammatory lesions count. Instrumental evaluation of erythema degree was performed by erythema‐directed digital photography (EDDP) by a 5‐point scale (from 0 = no redness to 4 = severe redness) at all time points. Tolerability was assessed by a self‐administered questionnaire at 8 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9. RESULTS: Forty‐four patients completed the study. At week 8, a significant decrease in baseline of IGA scores [median from 3 (T0) to 1 (T1)] and inflammatory lesions count [median from 8 (T0) to 1 (T1)] was recorded along with a significant reduction of erythema scores [median from 2 (T0) to 1 (T1)]. No relevant side effects were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that this new non‐irritating product represents a valid therapeutic option for mild/moderate inflammatory rosacea, and EDDP is able to provide a more defined evaluation of erythema changes.