Cargando…

Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Risk stratification after cure from hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a clinical challenge. We investigated the predictive value of noninvasive surrogates of portal hypertension (liver stiffness measurement [LSM] by vibration‐controlled transient elastography and von Wil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Semmler, Georg, Binter, Teresa, Kozbial, Karin, Schwabl, Philipp, Hametner‐Schreil, Stefanie, Zanetto, Alberto, Gavasso, Sabrina, Chromy, David, Bauer, David J.M., Simbrunner, Benedikt, Scheiner, Bernhard, Bucsics, Theresa, Stättermayer, Albert F., Pinter, Matthias, Steindl‐Munda, Petra, Schöfl, Rainer, Russo, Francesco Paolo, Simioni, Paolo, Trauner, Michael, Ferenci, Peter, Reiberger, Thomas, Mandorfer, Mattias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32659847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.31462
_version_ 1783717232883269632
author Semmler, Georg
Binter, Teresa
Kozbial, Karin
Schwabl, Philipp
Hametner‐Schreil, Stefanie
Zanetto, Alberto
Gavasso, Sabrina
Chromy, David
Bauer, David J.M.
Simbrunner, Benedikt
Scheiner, Bernhard
Bucsics, Theresa
Stättermayer, Albert F.
Pinter, Matthias
Steindl‐Munda, Petra
Schöfl, Rainer
Russo, Francesco Paolo
Simioni, Paolo
Trauner, Michael
Ferenci, Peter
Reiberger, Thomas
Mandorfer, Mattias
author_facet Semmler, Georg
Binter, Teresa
Kozbial, Karin
Schwabl, Philipp
Hametner‐Schreil, Stefanie
Zanetto, Alberto
Gavasso, Sabrina
Chromy, David
Bauer, David J.M.
Simbrunner, Benedikt
Scheiner, Bernhard
Bucsics, Theresa
Stättermayer, Albert F.
Pinter, Matthias
Steindl‐Munda, Petra
Schöfl, Rainer
Russo, Francesco Paolo
Simioni, Paolo
Trauner, Michael
Ferenci, Peter
Reiberger, Thomas
Mandorfer, Mattias
author_sort Semmler, Georg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Risk stratification after cure from hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a clinical challenge. We investigated the predictive value of noninvasive surrogates of portal hypertension (liver stiffness measurement [LSM] by vibration‐controlled transient elastography and von Willebrand factor/platelet count ratio [VITRO]) for development of hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with pretreatment advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) who achieved HCV cure. APPROACH AND RESULTS: A total of 276 patients with pretreatment ACLD and information on pretreatment and posttreatment follow‐up (FU)‐LSM and FU‐VITRO were followed for a median of 36.6 months after the end of interferon‐free therapy. FU‐LSM (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.875 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796‐0.954]) and FU‐VITRO (AUROC: 0.925 [95% CI: 0.874‐0.977]) showed an excellent predictive performance for hepatic decompensation. Both parameters provided incremental information and were significantly associated with hepatic decompensation in adjusted models. A previously proposed combined approach (FU‐LSM < 12.4 kPa and/or FU‐VITRO < 0.95) to rule out clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mm Hg) at FU assigned most (57.3%) of the patients to the low‐risk group; none of these patients developed hepatic decompensation. In contrast, in patients in whom FU‐CSPH was ruled in (FU‐LSM > 25.3 kPa and/or FU‐VITRO > 3.3; 25.0% of patients), the risk of hepatic decompensation at 3 years following treatment was high (17.4%). Patients within the diagnostic gray‐zone for FU‐CSPH (17.8% of patients) had a very low risk of hepatic decompensation during FU (2.6%). The prognostic value of this algorithm was validated in an internal (n = 86) and external (n = 162) cohort. CONCLUSION: FU‐LSM/FU‐VITRO are strongly and independently predictive of posttreatment hepatic decompensation in HCV‐induced ACLD. An algorithm combining these noninvasive markers not only rules in or rules out FU‐CSPH, but also identifies populations at negligible versus high risk for hepatic decompensation. FU‐LSM/FU‐VITRO are readily accessible and enable risk stratification after sustained virological response, and thus facilitate personalized management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8252110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82521102021-07-07 Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease Semmler, Georg Binter, Teresa Kozbial, Karin Schwabl, Philipp Hametner‐Schreil, Stefanie Zanetto, Alberto Gavasso, Sabrina Chromy, David Bauer, David J.M. Simbrunner, Benedikt Scheiner, Bernhard Bucsics, Theresa Stättermayer, Albert F. Pinter, Matthias Steindl‐Munda, Petra Schöfl, Rainer Russo, Francesco Paolo Simioni, Paolo Trauner, Michael Ferenci, Peter Reiberger, Thomas Mandorfer, Mattias Hepatology Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Risk stratification after cure from hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a clinical challenge. We investigated the predictive value of noninvasive surrogates of portal hypertension (liver stiffness measurement [LSM] by vibration‐controlled transient elastography and von Willebrand factor/platelet count ratio [VITRO]) for development of hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with pretreatment advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) who achieved HCV cure. APPROACH AND RESULTS: A total of 276 patients with pretreatment ACLD and information on pretreatment and posttreatment follow‐up (FU)‐LSM and FU‐VITRO were followed for a median of 36.6 months after the end of interferon‐free therapy. FU‐LSM (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.875 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796‐0.954]) and FU‐VITRO (AUROC: 0.925 [95% CI: 0.874‐0.977]) showed an excellent predictive performance for hepatic decompensation. Both parameters provided incremental information and were significantly associated with hepatic decompensation in adjusted models. A previously proposed combined approach (FU‐LSM < 12.4 kPa and/or FU‐VITRO < 0.95) to rule out clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mm Hg) at FU assigned most (57.3%) of the patients to the low‐risk group; none of these patients developed hepatic decompensation. In contrast, in patients in whom FU‐CSPH was ruled in (FU‐LSM > 25.3 kPa and/or FU‐VITRO > 3.3; 25.0% of patients), the risk of hepatic decompensation at 3 years following treatment was high (17.4%). Patients within the diagnostic gray‐zone for FU‐CSPH (17.8% of patients) had a very low risk of hepatic decompensation during FU (2.6%). The prognostic value of this algorithm was validated in an internal (n = 86) and external (n = 162) cohort. CONCLUSION: FU‐LSM/FU‐VITRO are strongly and independently predictive of posttreatment hepatic decompensation in HCV‐induced ACLD. An algorithm combining these noninvasive markers not only rules in or rules out FU‐CSPH, but also identifies populations at negligible versus high risk for hepatic decompensation. FU‐LSM/FU‐VITRO are readily accessible and enable risk stratification after sustained virological response, and thus facilitate personalized management. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-16 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8252110/ /pubmed/32659847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.31462 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Hepatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Semmler, Georg
Binter, Teresa
Kozbial, Karin
Schwabl, Philipp
Hametner‐Schreil, Stefanie
Zanetto, Alberto
Gavasso, Sabrina
Chromy, David
Bauer, David J.M.
Simbrunner, Benedikt
Scheiner, Bernhard
Bucsics, Theresa
Stättermayer, Albert F.
Pinter, Matthias
Steindl‐Munda, Petra
Schöfl, Rainer
Russo, Francesco Paolo
Simioni, Paolo
Trauner, Michael
Ferenci, Peter
Reiberger, Thomas
Mandorfer, Mattias
Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
title Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
title_full Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
title_fullStr Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
title_short Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
title_sort noninvasive risk stratification after hcv eradication in patients with advanced chronic liver disease
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32659847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.31462
work_keys_str_mv AT semmlergeorg noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT binterteresa noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT kozbialkarin noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT schwablphilipp noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT hametnerschreilstefanie noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT zanettoalberto noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT gavassosabrina noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT chromydavid noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT bauerdavidjm noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT simbrunnerbenedikt noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT scheinerbernhard noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT bucsicstheresa noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT stattermayeralbertf noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT pintermatthias noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT steindlmundapetra noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT schoflrainer noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT russofrancescopaolo noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT simionipaolo noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT traunermichael noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT ferencipeter noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT reibergerthomas noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease
AT mandorfermattias noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease