Cargando…
Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Risk stratification after cure from hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a clinical challenge. We investigated the predictive value of noninvasive surrogates of portal hypertension (liver stiffness measurement [LSM] by vibration‐controlled transient elastography and von Wil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32659847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.31462 |
_version_ | 1783717232883269632 |
---|---|
author | Semmler, Georg Binter, Teresa Kozbial, Karin Schwabl, Philipp Hametner‐Schreil, Stefanie Zanetto, Alberto Gavasso, Sabrina Chromy, David Bauer, David J.M. Simbrunner, Benedikt Scheiner, Bernhard Bucsics, Theresa Stättermayer, Albert F. Pinter, Matthias Steindl‐Munda, Petra Schöfl, Rainer Russo, Francesco Paolo Simioni, Paolo Trauner, Michael Ferenci, Peter Reiberger, Thomas Mandorfer, Mattias |
author_facet | Semmler, Georg Binter, Teresa Kozbial, Karin Schwabl, Philipp Hametner‐Schreil, Stefanie Zanetto, Alberto Gavasso, Sabrina Chromy, David Bauer, David J.M. Simbrunner, Benedikt Scheiner, Bernhard Bucsics, Theresa Stättermayer, Albert F. Pinter, Matthias Steindl‐Munda, Petra Schöfl, Rainer Russo, Francesco Paolo Simioni, Paolo Trauner, Michael Ferenci, Peter Reiberger, Thomas Mandorfer, Mattias |
author_sort | Semmler, Georg |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Risk stratification after cure from hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a clinical challenge. We investigated the predictive value of noninvasive surrogates of portal hypertension (liver stiffness measurement [LSM] by vibration‐controlled transient elastography and von Willebrand factor/platelet count ratio [VITRO]) for development of hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with pretreatment advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) who achieved HCV cure. APPROACH AND RESULTS: A total of 276 patients with pretreatment ACLD and information on pretreatment and posttreatment follow‐up (FU)‐LSM and FU‐VITRO were followed for a median of 36.6 months after the end of interferon‐free therapy. FU‐LSM (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.875 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796‐0.954]) and FU‐VITRO (AUROC: 0.925 [95% CI: 0.874‐0.977]) showed an excellent predictive performance for hepatic decompensation. Both parameters provided incremental information and were significantly associated with hepatic decompensation in adjusted models. A previously proposed combined approach (FU‐LSM < 12.4 kPa and/or FU‐VITRO < 0.95) to rule out clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mm Hg) at FU assigned most (57.3%) of the patients to the low‐risk group; none of these patients developed hepatic decompensation. In contrast, in patients in whom FU‐CSPH was ruled in (FU‐LSM > 25.3 kPa and/or FU‐VITRO > 3.3; 25.0% of patients), the risk of hepatic decompensation at 3 years following treatment was high (17.4%). Patients within the diagnostic gray‐zone for FU‐CSPH (17.8% of patients) had a very low risk of hepatic decompensation during FU (2.6%). The prognostic value of this algorithm was validated in an internal (n = 86) and external (n = 162) cohort. CONCLUSION: FU‐LSM/FU‐VITRO are strongly and independently predictive of posttreatment hepatic decompensation in HCV‐induced ACLD. An algorithm combining these noninvasive markers not only rules in or rules out FU‐CSPH, but also identifies populations at negligible versus high risk for hepatic decompensation. FU‐LSM/FU‐VITRO are readily accessible and enable risk stratification after sustained virological response, and thus facilitate personalized management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8252110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82521102021-07-07 Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease Semmler, Georg Binter, Teresa Kozbial, Karin Schwabl, Philipp Hametner‐Schreil, Stefanie Zanetto, Alberto Gavasso, Sabrina Chromy, David Bauer, David J.M. Simbrunner, Benedikt Scheiner, Bernhard Bucsics, Theresa Stättermayer, Albert F. Pinter, Matthias Steindl‐Munda, Petra Schöfl, Rainer Russo, Francesco Paolo Simioni, Paolo Trauner, Michael Ferenci, Peter Reiberger, Thomas Mandorfer, Mattias Hepatology Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Risk stratification after cure from hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a clinical challenge. We investigated the predictive value of noninvasive surrogates of portal hypertension (liver stiffness measurement [LSM] by vibration‐controlled transient elastography and von Willebrand factor/platelet count ratio [VITRO]) for development of hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with pretreatment advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) who achieved HCV cure. APPROACH AND RESULTS: A total of 276 patients with pretreatment ACLD and information on pretreatment and posttreatment follow‐up (FU)‐LSM and FU‐VITRO were followed for a median of 36.6 months after the end of interferon‐free therapy. FU‐LSM (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.875 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796‐0.954]) and FU‐VITRO (AUROC: 0.925 [95% CI: 0.874‐0.977]) showed an excellent predictive performance for hepatic decompensation. Both parameters provided incremental information and were significantly associated with hepatic decompensation in adjusted models. A previously proposed combined approach (FU‐LSM < 12.4 kPa and/or FU‐VITRO < 0.95) to rule out clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mm Hg) at FU assigned most (57.3%) of the patients to the low‐risk group; none of these patients developed hepatic decompensation. In contrast, in patients in whom FU‐CSPH was ruled in (FU‐LSM > 25.3 kPa and/or FU‐VITRO > 3.3; 25.0% of patients), the risk of hepatic decompensation at 3 years following treatment was high (17.4%). Patients within the diagnostic gray‐zone for FU‐CSPH (17.8% of patients) had a very low risk of hepatic decompensation during FU (2.6%). The prognostic value of this algorithm was validated in an internal (n = 86) and external (n = 162) cohort. CONCLUSION: FU‐LSM/FU‐VITRO are strongly and independently predictive of posttreatment hepatic decompensation in HCV‐induced ACLD. An algorithm combining these noninvasive markers not only rules in or rules out FU‐CSPH, but also identifies populations at negligible versus high risk for hepatic decompensation. FU‐LSM/FU‐VITRO are readily accessible and enable risk stratification after sustained virological response, and thus facilitate personalized management. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-16 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8252110/ /pubmed/32659847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.31462 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Hepatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Semmler, Georg Binter, Teresa Kozbial, Karin Schwabl, Philipp Hametner‐Schreil, Stefanie Zanetto, Alberto Gavasso, Sabrina Chromy, David Bauer, David J.M. Simbrunner, Benedikt Scheiner, Bernhard Bucsics, Theresa Stättermayer, Albert F. Pinter, Matthias Steindl‐Munda, Petra Schöfl, Rainer Russo, Francesco Paolo Simioni, Paolo Trauner, Michael Ferenci, Peter Reiberger, Thomas Mandorfer, Mattias Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease |
title | Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease |
title_full | Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease |
title_fullStr | Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease |
title_short | Noninvasive Risk Stratification After HCV Eradication in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease |
title_sort | noninvasive risk stratification after hcv eradication in patients with advanced chronic liver disease |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32659847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.31462 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT semmlergeorg noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT binterteresa noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT kozbialkarin noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT schwablphilipp noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT hametnerschreilstefanie noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT zanettoalberto noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT gavassosabrina noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT chromydavid noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT bauerdavidjm noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT simbrunnerbenedikt noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT scheinerbernhard noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT bucsicstheresa noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT stattermayeralbertf noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT pintermatthias noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT steindlmundapetra noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT schoflrainer noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT russofrancescopaolo noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT simionipaolo noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT traunermichael noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT ferencipeter noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT reibergerthomas noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease AT mandorfermattias noninvasiveriskstratificationafterhcveradicationinpatientswithadvancedchronicliverdisease |