Cargando…
A system dynamics approach for understanding community resilience to disaster risk
The Western Cape is a dynamic province that is disaster-prone, particularly the vulnerable urban communities in and around its environs. Such communities are more vulnerable to wildfire, flooding, pandemic, natural and human-made hazards because of poverty and, consequently, poor living conditions s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34230846 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v13i1.1037 |
_version_ | 1783717243034533888 |
---|---|
author | Onyeagoziri, Onyekachi J. Shaw, Corrinne Ryan, Tom |
author_facet | Onyeagoziri, Onyekachi J. Shaw, Corrinne Ryan, Tom |
author_sort | Onyeagoziri, Onyekachi J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Western Cape is a dynamic province that is disaster-prone, particularly the vulnerable urban communities in and around its environs. Such communities are more vulnerable to wildfire, flooding, pandemic, natural and human-made hazards because of poverty and, consequently, poor living conditions such as overcrowding and non-understanding of community resilience. The inability of these communities to understand community resilience and withstand adversities affects the sustainability of initiatives to develop them. This study aims to identify the mechanisms influencing the level of understanding of community resilience in a vulnerable community and to contribute to the understanding of community resilience to disaster risk. Fieldwork was conducted in an informal settlement in South Africa. The research study was conducted in two cycles of data collection and analysis. Data in the form of observation notes, document analysis and interviews were analysed using grounded-theory principles. Ten inter-related variables or mechanisms emerged from the analysis. The theoretical model consists of four reinforcing (R) feedback loops (R1, R2, R3 and R4), respectively, which explain how the understanding of community resilience in the informal settlement maps on to the relative achievement systems archetype. Negative reinforcing behaviour would explain the lack of understanding of community resilience, while positive reinforcing behaviour indicates how an understanding of community resilience develops. In addition, the variable with the leverage to improve the mechanisms influencing the understanding of community resilience was found to be the ‘level of public education and awareness’. The theory of how these variables behave in context was represented as a qualitative system dynamics model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8252161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82521612021-07-02 A system dynamics approach for understanding community resilience to disaster risk Onyeagoziri, Onyekachi J. Shaw, Corrinne Ryan, Tom Jamba Original Research The Western Cape is a dynamic province that is disaster-prone, particularly the vulnerable urban communities in and around its environs. Such communities are more vulnerable to wildfire, flooding, pandemic, natural and human-made hazards because of poverty and, consequently, poor living conditions such as overcrowding and non-understanding of community resilience. The inability of these communities to understand community resilience and withstand adversities affects the sustainability of initiatives to develop them. This study aims to identify the mechanisms influencing the level of understanding of community resilience in a vulnerable community and to contribute to the understanding of community resilience to disaster risk. Fieldwork was conducted in an informal settlement in South Africa. The research study was conducted in two cycles of data collection and analysis. Data in the form of observation notes, document analysis and interviews were analysed using grounded-theory principles. Ten inter-related variables or mechanisms emerged from the analysis. The theoretical model consists of four reinforcing (R) feedback loops (R1, R2, R3 and R4), respectively, which explain how the understanding of community resilience in the informal settlement maps on to the relative achievement systems archetype. Negative reinforcing behaviour would explain the lack of understanding of community resilience, while positive reinforcing behaviour indicates how an understanding of community resilience develops. In addition, the variable with the leverage to improve the mechanisms influencing the understanding of community resilience was found to be the ‘level of public education and awareness’. The theory of how these variables behave in context was represented as a qualitative system dynamics model. AOSIS 2021-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8252161/ /pubmed/34230846 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v13i1.1037 Text en © 2021. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Onyeagoziri, Onyekachi J. Shaw, Corrinne Ryan, Tom A system dynamics approach for understanding community resilience to disaster risk |
title | A system dynamics approach for understanding community resilience to disaster risk |
title_full | A system dynamics approach for understanding community resilience to disaster risk |
title_fullStr | A system dynamics approach for understanding community resilience to disaster risk |
title_full_unstemmed | A system dynamics approach for understanding community resilience to disaster risk |
title_short | A system dynamics approach for understanding community resilience to disaster risk |
title_sort | system dynamics approach for understanding community resilience to disaster risk |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34230846 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v13i1.1037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onyeagozirionyekachij asystemdynamicsapproachforunderstandingcommunityresiliencetodisasterrisk AT shawcorrinne asystemdynamicsapproachforunderstandingcommunityresiliencetodisasterrisk AT ryantom asystemdynamicsapproachforunderstandingcommunityresiliencetodisasterrisk AT onyeagozirionyekachij systemdynamicsapproachforunderstandingcommunityresiliencetodisasterrisk AT shawcorrinne systemdynamicsapproachforunderstandingcommunityresiliencetodisasterrisk AT ryantom systemdynamicsapproachforunderstandingcommunityresiliencetodisasterrisk |