Cargando…

A propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod

BACKGROUND: Although the aggregate of data among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have shown similar efficacy between dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and fingolimod (FTY), most studies have not assessed long-term worsening of disability. We compared long-term disability worsening over 5 years, as asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salter, Amber, Lancia, Samantha, Cutter, Gary, Marrie, Ruth Ann, Mendoza, Jason P., Lewin, James B., Fox Mellen, Robert J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211021177
_version_ 1783717291356061696
author Salter, Amber
Lancia, Samantha
Cutter, Gary
Marrie, Ruth Ann
Mendoza, Jason P.
Lewin, James B.
Fox Mellen, Robert J.
author_facet Salter, Amber
Lancia, Samantha
Cutter, Gary
Marrie, Ruth Ann
Mendoza, Jason P.
Lewin, James B.
Fox Mellen, Robert J.
author_sort Salter, Amber
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the aggregate of data among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have shown similar efficacy between dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and fingolimod (FTY), most studies have not assessed long-term worsening of disability. We compared long-term disability worsening over 5 years, as assessed by the Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), among participants with MS treated with DMF or FTY. METHODS: We identified individuals in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) registry who had relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), residing in the United States (Spring 2011 to Spring 2018), who initiated treatment with DMF (n = 689) or FTY (n = 565) and had ⩾1 year follow-up on index treatment. Participants receiving DMF who were previously treated with FTY and those on FTY previously treated with DMF were excluded. Propensity score matching at baseline was used to match FTY-treated to DMF-treated participants. Time to 6-month confirmed disability worsening (⩾1-point increase on PDDS, sustained for ⩾6 months) was estimated using Cox regression. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for differences in the duration of index exposure between DMF and FTY groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 468 DMF-treated participants were matched with 468 FTY-treated participants. Median treatment duration was 3.0 years for DMF and 4.0 years for FTY. At 5 years, 68.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 62.4–73.5] of DMF-treated participants and 63.3% (95% CI: 59.6–70.1) treated with FTY were free from 6-month confirmed PDDS worsening [hazard ratio (HR) 1.01 (95% CI: 0.79–1.28); p = 0.95]. Results were similar in the sensitivity analysis: 70.5% (95% CI: 61.8–77.6) of DMF-treated participants and 72.7% (95% CI: 65.4–78.6) of FTY-treated participants were free from 6-month confirmed PDDS worsening [HR: 1.04 (95% CI: 0.71–1.51); p = 0.84]. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with MS from the NARCOMS registry, there was no significant difference in confirmed disability (PDDS) worsening over 5 years between those treated with DMF versus FTY.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8252399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82523992021-07-13 A propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod Salter, Amber Lancia, Samantha Cutter, Gary Marrie, Ruth Ann Mendoza, Jason P. Lewin, James B. Fox Mellen, Robert J. Ther Adv Neurol Disord Original Research BACKGROUND: Although the aggregate of data among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have shown similar efficacy between dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and fingolimod (FTY), most studies have not assessed long-term worsening of disability. We compared long-term disability worsening over 5 years, as assessed by the Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), among participants with MS treated with DMF or FTY. METHODS: We identified individuals in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) registry who had relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), residing in the United States (Spring 2011 to Spring 2018), who initiated treatment with DMF (n = 689) or FTY (n = 565) and had ⩾1 year follow-up on index treatment. Participants receiving DMF who were previously treated with FTY and those on FTY previously treated with DMF were excluded. Propensity score matching at baseline was used to match FTY-treated to DMF-treated participants. Time to 6-month confirmed disability worsening (⩾1-point increase on PDDS, sustained for ⩾6 months) was estimated using Cox regression. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for differences in the duration of index exposure between DMF and FTY groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 468 DMF-treated participants were matched with 468 FTY-treated participants. Median treatment duration was 3.0 years for DMF and 4.0 years for FTY. At 5 years, 68.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 62.4–73.5] of DMF-treated participants and 63.3% (95% CI: 59.6–70.1) treated with FTY were free from 6-month confirmed PDDS worsening [hazard ratio (HR) 1.01 (95% CI: 0.79–1.28); p = 0.95]. Results were similar in the sensitivity analysis: 70.5% (95% CI: 61.8–77.6) of DMF-treated participants and 72.7% (95% CI: 65.4–78.6) of FTY-treated participants were free from 6-month confirmed PDDS worsening [HR: 1.04 (95% CI: 0.71–1.51); p = 0.84]. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with MS from the NARCOMS registry, there was no significant difference in confirmed disability (PDDS) worsening over 5 years between those treated with DMF versus FTY. SAGE Publications 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8252399/ /pubmed/34262613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211021177 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Salter, Amber
Lancia, Samantha
Cutter, Gary
Marrie, Ruth Ann
Mendoza, Jason P.
Lewin, James B.
Fox Mellen, Robert J.
A propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod
title A propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod
title_full A propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod
title_fullStr A propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod
title_full_unstemmed A propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod
title_short A propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod
title_sort propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211021177
work_keys_str_mv AT salteramber apropensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT lanciasamantha apropensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT cuttergary apropensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT marrieruthann apropensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT mendozajasonp apropensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT lewinjamesb apropensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT foxmellenrobertj apropensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT salteramber propensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT lanciasamantha propensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT cuttergary propensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT marrieruthann propensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT mendozajasonp propensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT lewinjamesb propensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod
AT foxmellenrobertj propensitymatchedcomparisonoflongtermdisabilityworseninginpatientswithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithdimethylfumarateorfingolimod