Cargando…

Comparative Performance of Multiple Linear Regression and Biotic Ligand Models for Estimating the Bioavailability of Copper in Freshwater

An increasing number of metal bioavailability models are available for use in setting regulations and conducting risk assessments in aquatic systems. Selection of the most appropriate model is dependent on the user's needs but will always benefit from an objective, comparative assessment of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brix, Kevin V., Tear, Lucinda, Santore, Robert C., Croteau, Kelly, DeForest, David K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5012
_version_ 1783717312822509568
author Brix, Kevin V.
Tear, Lucinda
Santore, Robert C.
Croteau, Kelly
DeForest, David K.
author_facet Brix, Kevin V.
Tear, Lucinda
Santore, Robert C.
Croteau, Kelly
DeForest, David K.
author_sort Brix, Kevin V.
collection PubMed
description An increasing number of metal bioavailability models are available for use in setting regulations and conducting risk assessments in aquatic systems. Selection of the most appropriate model is dependent on the user's needs but will always benefit from an objective, comparative assessment of the performance of available models. In 2017, an expert workshop developed procedures for assessing metal bioavailability models. The present study applies these procedures to evaluate the performance of biotic ligand models (BLMs) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models for copper. We find that the procedures recommended by the expert workshop generally provide a robust series of metrics for evaluating model performance. However, we recommend some modifications to the analysis of model residuals because the current method is insensitive to relatively large differences in residual patterns when comparing models. We also provide clarification on details of the evaluation procedure which, if not applied correctly, could mischaracterize model performance. We found that acute Cu MLR and BLM performances are quite comparable, though there are differences in performance on a species‐specific basis and in the resulting water quality criteria as a function of water chemistry. In contrast, the chronic Cu MLR performed distinctly better than the BLM. Observed differences in performance are due to the smaller effects of hardness and pH on chronic Cu toxicity compared to acute Cu toxicity. These differences are captured in the chronic MLR model but not the chronic BLM, which only adjusts for differences in organism sensitivity. In general, we continue to recommend concurrent development of both modeling approaches because they provide useful comparative insights into the strengths, limitations, and predictive capabilities of each model. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1649–1661. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8252496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82524962021-07-07 Comparative Performance of Multiple Linear Regression and Biotic Ligand Models for Estimating the Bioavailability of Copper in Freshwater Brix, Kevin V. Tear, Lucinda Santore, Robert C. Croteau, Kelly DeForest, David K. Environ Toxicol Chem Environmental Toxicology An increasing number of metal bioavailability models are available for use in setting regulations and conducting risk assessments in aquatic systems. Selection of the most appropriate model is dependent on the user's needs but will always benefit from an objective, comparative assessment of the performance of available models. In 2017, an expert workshop developed procedures for assessing metal bioavailability models. The present study applies these procedures to evaluate the performance of biotic ligand models (BLMs) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models for copper. We find that the procedures recommended by the expert workshop generally provide a robust series of metrics for evaluating model performance. However, we recommend some modifications to the analysis of model residuals because the current method is insensitive to relatively large differences in residual patterns when comparing models. We also provide clarification on details of the evaluation procedure which, if not applied correctly, could mischaracterize model performance. We found that acute Cu MLR and BLM performances are quite comparable, though there are differences in performance on a species‐specific basis and in the resulting water quality criteria as a function of water chemistry. In contrast, the chronic Cu MLR performed distinctly better than the BLM. Observed differences in performance are due to the smaller effects of hardness and pH on chronic Cu toxicity compared to acute Cu toxicity. These differences are captured in the chronic MLR model but not the chronic BLM, which only adjusts for differences in organism sensitivity. In general, we continue to recommend concurrent development of both modeling approaches because they provide useful comparative insights into the strengths, limitations, and predictive capabilities of each model. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1649–1661. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-08 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8252496/ /pubmed/33590908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5012 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Environmental Toxicology
Brix, Kevin V.
Tear, Lucinda
Santore, Robert C.
Croteau, Kelly
DeForest, David K.
Comparative Performance of Multiple Linear Regression and Biotic Ligand Models for Estimating the Bioavailability of Copper in Freshwater
title Comparative Performance of Multiple Linear Regression and Biotic Ligand Models for Estimating the Bioavailability of Copper in Freshwater
title_full Comparative Performance of Multiple Linear Regression and Biotic Ligand Models for Estimating the Bioavailability of Copper in Freshwater
title_fullStr Comparative Performance of Multiple Linear Regression and Biotic Ligand Models for Estimating the Bioavailability of Copper in Freshwater
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Performance of Multiple Linear Regression and Biotic Ligand Models for Estimating the Bioavailability of Copper in Freshwater
title_short Comparative Performance of Multiple Linear Regression and Biotic Ligand Models for Estimating the Bioavailability of Copper in Freshwater
title_sort comparative performance of multiple linear regression and biotic ligand models for estimating the bioavailability of copper in freshwater
topic Environmental Toxicology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5012
work_keys_str_mv AT brixkevinv comparativeperformanceofmultiplelinearregressionandbioticligandmodelsforestimatingthebioavailabilityofcopperinfreshwater
AT tearlucinda comparativeperformanceofmultiplelinearregressionandbioticligandmodelsforestimatingthebioavailabilityofcopperinfreshwater
AT santorerobertc comparativeperformanceofmultiplelinearregressionandbioticligandmodelsforestimatingthebioavailabilityofcopperinfreshwater
AT croteaukelly comparativeperformanceofmultiplelinearregressionandbioticligandmodelsforestimatingthebioavailabilityofcopperinfreshwater
AT deforestdavidk comparativeperformanceofmultiplelinearregressionandbioticligandmodelsforestimatingthebioavailabilityofcopperinfreshwater