Optimal substrate modification strategies using catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: 3‐year follow‐up outcomes

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of four ablation strategies on the incidence rates of freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) through a 3‐year follow‐up in patients with persistent AF. BACKGROUND: The optimal substrate modification strategies using catheter ablation for patients with persistent AF remain unclear. METHODS: Patients with persistent AF were enrolled consecutively to undergo each of four ablation strategies: (a) Group 1 (Gp 1, n = 69), pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus rotor ablation assisted by similarity index and phase mapping; (b) Gp 2 (n = 75), PVI plus linear ablations at the left atrium; (c) Gp 3 (n = 42), PVI plus the elimination of complex fractionated atrial electrograms; (d) Gp 4 (n = 67), PVI only. Potential confounders were adjusted via a multivariate survival parametric model. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar across the four groups. At a follow‐up period of 34.9 ± 38.6 months, patients in Gp 1 showed the highest rate of freedom from AF compared with the other three groups (p = .002), while patients in Gp 3 and 4 showed lower rates of freedom from AT than those of the other two groups (p = .006). Independent predictors of recurrence of AF were the ablation strategy (p = .002) and left atrial diameter (LAD) (p = .01). CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent AF, a substrate modification strategy using rotor ablation assisted by similarity index and phase mapping provided a benefit for maintaining sinus rhythm compared with the other strategies. Both ablation strategy and baseline LAD predicted the 3‐year outcomes of freedom from AT/AF