Cargando…

Outcomes of “Real-World” Insulin Strategies in the Management of Hospital Hyperglycemia

CONTEXT: Guidelines recommend scheduled long-acting basal and short-acting bolus insulin several times daily to manage inpatient hyperglycemia. In the “real world,” insulin therapy is complicated, with limited data on the comparative effectiveness of different insulin strategies. OBJECTIVE: This wor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadhu, Archana R, Patham, Bhargavi, Vadhariya, Aisha, Chikermane, Soumya G, Johnson, Michael L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab101
_version_ 1783717346232238080
author Sadhu, Archana R
Patham, Bhargavi
Vadhariya, Aisha
Chikermane, Soumya G
Johnson, Michael L
author_facet Sadhu, Archana R
Patham, Bhargavi
Vadhariya, Aisha
Chikermane, Soumya G
Johnson, Michael L
author_sort Sadhu, Archana R
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Guidelines recommend scheduled long-acting basal and short-acting bolus insulin several times daily to manage inpatient hyperglycemia. In the “real world,” insulin therapy is complicated, with limited data on the comparative effectiveness of different insulin strategies. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to evaluate the association of different insulin strategies with glucose control and hospital outcomes after adjustment for patient and physician factors that influence choice of therapy. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study took place at an academic hospital. Participants included noncritically ill hospitalized medical/surgical patients (n = 4558) receiving subcutaneous insulin for 75% or longer during admission. Insulin therapy was grouped into 3 strategies within the first 48 hours: basal bolus (BB: scheduled long and short/rapid n = 2358), sliding scale (SS: short/rapid acting n = 1855), or basal only (BO: long only: n = 345). Main outcome measures included glucose control: hypoglycemic days, hyperglycemic days, euglycemic days, mean glucose; and hospitalization: in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions. RESULTS: Initial therapy with BB was associated with more hypoglycemic (2.40; CI, 2.04 to 2.82) (P < .001) and fewer euglycemic days (0.90; CI, 0.85 to 0.97) (P = .003) than SS, whereas BO was associated with fewer hyperglycemic days (0.70; CI, 0.62 to 0.79) (P < .001), lower mean glucose (–18.03; CI, –22.46 to –12.61) (P < .001), and more euglycemic days (1.22; CI, 1.09 to 1.37) (P < .001) compared to SS. No difference in mortality, LOS, and readmissions was found. However, decreased LOS was observed in the BB subgroup with a medical diagnostic related group (0.93; CI, 0.89 to 0.97) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: BO had a more favorable hyperglycemia profile than SS. BB, on the other hand, showed worse glycemic control as compared to SS. In the real-world hospital, BO may be a simpler and more effective insulin strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8252645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82526452021-07-06 Outcomes of “Real-World” Insulin Strategies in the Management of Hospital Hyperglycemia Sadhu, Archana R Patham, Bhargavi Vadhariya, Aisha Chikermane, Soumya G Johnson, Michael L J Endocr Soc Clinical Research Articles CONTEXT: Guidelines recommend scheduled long-acting basal and short-acting bolus insulin several times daily to manage inpatient hyperglycemia. In the “real world,” insulin therapy is complicated, with limited data on the comparative effectiveness of different insulin strategies. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to evaluate the association of different insulin strategies with glucose control and hospital outcomes after adjustment for patient and physician factors that influence choice of therapy. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study took place at an academic hospital. Participants included noncritically ill hospitalized medical/surgical patients (n = 4558) receiving subcutaneous insulin for 75% or longer during admission. Insulin therapy was grouped into 3 strategies within the first 48 hours: basal bolus (BB: scheduled long and short/rapid n = 2358), sliding scale (SS: short/rapid acting n = 1855), or basal only (BO: long only: n = 345). Main outcome measures included glucose control: hypoglycemic days, hyperglycemic days, euglycemic days, mean glucose; and hospitalization: in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions. RESULTS: Initial therapy with BB was associated with more hypoglycemic (2.40; CI, 2.04 to 2.82) (P < .001) and fewer euglycemic days (0.90; CI, 0.85 to 0.97) (P = .003) than SS, whereas BO was associated with fewer hyperglycemic days (0.70; CI, 0.62 to 0.79) (P < .001), lower mean glucose (–18.03; CI, –22.46 to –12.61) (P < .001), and more euglycemic days (1.22; CI, 1.09 to 1.37) (P < .001) compared to SS. No difference in mortality, LOS, and readmissions was found. However, decreased LOS was observed in the BB subgroup with a medical diagnostic related group (0.93; CI, 0.89 to 0.97) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: BO had a more favorable hyperglycemia profile than SS. BB, on the other hand, showed worse glycemic control as compared to SS. In the real-world hospital, BO may be a simpler and more effective insulin strategy. Oxford University Press 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8252645/ /pubmed/34235360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab101 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research Articles
Sadhu, Archana R
Patham, Bhargavi
Vadhariya, Aisha
Chikermane, Soumya G
Johnson, Michael L
Outcomes of “Real-World” Insulin Strategies in the Management of Hospital Hyperglycemia
title Outcomes of “Real-World” Insulin Strategies in the Management of Hospital Hyperglycemia
title_full Outcomes of “Real-World” Insulin Strategies in the Management of Hospital Hyperglycemia
title_fullStr Outcomes of “Real-World” Insulin Strategies in the Management of Hospital Hyperglycemia
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of “Real-World” Insulin Strategies in the Management of Hospital Hyperglycemia
title_short Outcomes of “Real-World” Insulin Strategies in the Management of Hospital Hyperglycemia
title_sort outcomes of “real-world” insulin strategies in the management of hospital hyperglycemia
topic Clinical Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvab101
work_keys_str_mv AT sadhuarchanar outcomesofrealworldinsulinstrategiesinthemanagementofhospitalhyperglycemia
AT pathambhargavi outcomesofrealworldinsulinstrategiesinthemanagementofhospitalhyperglycemia
AT vadhariyaaisha outcomesofrealworldinsulinstrategiesinthemanagementofhospitalhyperglycemia
AT chikermanesoumyag outcomesofrealworldinsulinstrategiesinthemanagementofhospitalhyperglycemia
AT johnsonmichaell outcomesofrealworldinsulinstrategiesinthemanagementofhospitalhyperglycemia