Cargando…
Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment
A large number of methodological procedures and experimental conditions are reported to describe the masticatory process. However, similar terms are sometimes employed to describe different methodologies. Standardisation of terms is essential to allow comparisons among different studies. This articl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33638156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13161 |
_version_ | 1783717372792668160 |
---|---|
author | Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega Schimmel, Martin van der Bilt, Andries Chen, Jianshe van der Glas, Hilbert W. Kohyama, Kaoru Hennequin, Martine Peyron, Marie‐Agnès Woda, Alain Leles, Claudio Rodrigues José Pereira, Luciano |
author_facet | Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega Schimmel, Martin van der Bilt, Andries Chen, Jianshe van der Glas, Hilbert W. Kohyama, Kaoru Hennequin, Martine Peyron, Marie‐Agnès Woda, Alain Leles, Claudio Rodrigues José Pereira, Luciano |
author_sort | Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega |
collection | PubMed |
description | A large number of methodological procedures and experimental conditions are reported to describe the masticatory process. However, similar terms are sometimes employed to describe different methodologies. Standardisation of terms is essential to allow comparisons among different studies. This article was aimed to provide a consensus concerning the terms, definitions and technical methods generally reported when evaluating masticatory function objectively and subjectively. The consensus is based on the results from discussions and consultations among world‐leading researchers in the related research areas. Advantages, limitations and relevance of each method are also discussed. The present consensus provides a revised framework of standardised terms to improve the consistent use of masticatory terminology and facilitate further investigations on masticatory function analysis. In addition, this article also outlines various methods used to evaluate the masticatory process and their advantages and disadvantages in order to help researchers to design their experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8252777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82527772021-07-12 Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega Schimmel, Martin van der Bilt, Andries Chen, Jianshe van der Glas, Hilbert W. Kohyama, Kaoru Hennequin, Martine Peyron, Marie‐Agnès Woda, Alain Leles, Claudio Rodrigues José Pereira, Luciano J Oral Rehabil Review A large number of methodological procedures and experimental conditions are reported to describe the masticatory process. However, similar terms are sometimes employed to describe different methodologies. Standardisation of terms is essential to allow comparisons among different studies. This article was aimed to provide a consensus concerning the terms, definitions and technical methods generally reported when evaluating masticatory function objectively and subjectively. The consensus is based on the results from discussions and consultations among world‐leading researchers in the related research areas. Advantages, limitations and relevance of each method are also discussed. The present consensus provides a revised framework of standardised terms to improve the consistent use of masticatory terminology and facilitate further investigations on masticatory function analysis. In addition, this article also outlines various methods used to evaluate the masticatory process and their advantages and disadvantages in order to help researchers to design their experiments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-29 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8252777/ /pubmed/33638156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13161 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega Schimmel, Martin van der Bilt, Andries Chen, Jianshe van der Glas, Hilbert W. Kohyama, Kaoru Hennequin, Martine Peyron, Marie‐Agnès Woda, Alain Leles, Claudio Rodrigues José Pereira, Luciano Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment |
title | Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment |
title_full | Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment |
title_fullStr | Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment |
title_short | Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment |
title_sort | consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33638156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goncalvesthaismarquessimekvega consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment AT schimmelmartin consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment AT vanderbiltandries consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment AT chenjianshe consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment AT vanderglashilbertw consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment AT kohyamakaoru consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment AT hennequinmartine consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment AT peyronmarieagnes consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment AT wodaalain consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment AT lelesclaudiorodrigues consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment AT josepereiraluciano consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment |