Cargando…

Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment

A large number of methodological procedures and experimental conditions are reported to describe the masticatory process. However, similar terms are sometimes employed to describe different methodologies. Standardisation of terms is essential to allow comparisons among different studies. This articl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega, Schimmel, Martin, van der Bilt, Andries, Chen, Jianshe, van der Glas, Hilbert W., Kohyama, Kaoru, Hennequin, Martine, Peyron, Marie‐Agnès, Woda, Alain, Leles, Claudio Rodrigues, José Pereira, Luciano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33638156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13161
_version_ 1783717372792668160
author Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega
Schimmel, Martin
van der Bilt, Andries
Chen, Jianshe
van der Glas, Hilbert W.
Kohyama, Kaoru
Hennequin, Martine
Peyron, Marie‐Agnès
Woda, Alain
Leles, Claudio Rodrigues
José Pereira, Luciano
author_facet Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega
Schimmel, Martin
van der Bilt, Andries
Chen, Jianshe
van der Glas, Hilbert W.
Kohyama, Kaoru
Hennequin, Martine
Peyron, Marie‐Agnès
Woda, Alain
Leles, Claudio Rodrigues
José Pereira, Luciano
author_sort Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega
collection PubMed
description A large number of methodological procedures and experimental conditions are reported to describe the masticatory process. However, similar terms are sometimes employed to describe different methodologies. Standardisation of terms is essential to allow comparisons among different studies. This article was aimed to provide a consensus concerning the terms, definitions and technical methods generally reported when evaluating masticatory function objectively and subjectively. The consensus is based on the results from discussions and consultations among world‐leading researchers in the related research areas. Advantages, limitations and relevance of each method are also discussed. The present consensus provides a revised framework of standardised terms to improve the consistent use of masticatory terminology and facilitate further investigations on masticatory function analysis. In addition, this article also outlines various methods used to evaluate the masticatory process and their advantages and disadvantages in order to help researchers to design their experiments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8252777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82527772021-07-12 Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega Schimmel, Martin van der Bilt, Andries Chen, Jianshe van der Glas, Hilbert W. Kohyama, Kaoru Hennequin, Martine Peyron, Marie‐Agnès Woda, Alain Leles, Claudio Rodrigues José Pereira, Luciano J Oral Rehabil Review A large number of methodological procedures and experimental conditions are reported to describe the masticatory process. However, similar terms are sometimes employed to describe different methodologies. Standardisation of terms is essential to allow comparisons among different studies. This article was aimed to provide a consensus concerning the terms, definitions and technical methods generally reported when evaluating masticatory function objectively and subjectively. The consensus is based on the results from discussions and consultations among world‐leading researchers in the related research areas. Advantages, limitations and relevance of each method are also discussed. The present consensus provides a revised framework of standardised terms to improve the consistent use of masticatory terminology and facilitate further investigations on masticatory function analysis. In addition, this article also outlines various methods used to evaluate the masticatory process and their advantages and disadvantages in order to help researchers to design their experiments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-29 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8252777/ /pubmed/33638156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13161 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Gonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega
Schimmel, Martin
van der Bilt, Andries
Chen, Jianshe
van der Glas, Hilbert W.
Kohyama, Kaoru
Hennequin, Martine
Peyron, Marie‐Agnès
Woda, Alain
Leles, Claudio Rodrigues
José Pereira, Luciano
Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment
title Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment
title_full Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment
title_fullStr Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment
title_full_unstemmed Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment
title_short Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment
title_sort consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33638156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13161
work_keys_str_mv AT goncalvesthaismarquessimekvega consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment
AT schimmelmartin consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment
AT vanderbiltandries consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment
AT chenjianshe consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment
AT vanderglashilbertw consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment
AT kohyamakaoru consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment
AT hennequinmartine consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment
AT peyronmarieagnes consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment
AT wodaalain consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment
AT lelesclaudiorodrigues consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment
AT josepereiraluciano consensusontheterminologiesandmethodologiesformasticatoryassessment