Cargando…

Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND: In England, GPs are independent contractors working to a national contract. Since 2017, the contract requires GPs to use electronic tools to proactively identify moderate and severe frailty in people aged ≥65 years, and offer interventions to help those identified to stay well and mainta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulla, Ebrahim, Orton, Elizabeth, Kendrick, Denise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33657008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0178
_version_ 1783717388482510848
author Mulla, Ebrahim
Orton, Elizabeth
Kendrick, Denise
author_facet Mulla, Ebrahim
Orton, Elizabeth
Kendrick, Denise
author_sort Mulla, Ebrahim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In England, GPs are independent contractors working to a national contract. Since 2017, the contract requires GPs to use electronic tools to proactively identify moderate and severe frailty in people aged ≥65 years, and offer interventions to help those identified to stay well and maintain independent living. Little is currently known about GPs’ views of this contractual requirement. AIM: To explore GPs’ views of identifying frailty and offering interventions for those living with moderate or severe frailty. DESIGN AND SETTING: A sequential mixed-methods study of GPs in the East Midlands region of England — namely Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, and Northamptonshire — undertaken between January and May 2019. METHOD: GPs were made aware of the study via professional organisations’ newsletters and bulletins, GP email lists, and social media, and were invited to complete an online questionnaire. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and, based on those survey responses, GPs with a range of GP and practice characteristics, as well as views on identifying frailty, were selected to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview. Interview transcripts were analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS: In total, 188 out of 3058 (6.1%) GPs responded to the survey and 18 GPs were interviewed. GPs were broadly supportive of identifying frailty, but felt risk-stratification tools lacked sensitivity and specificity, and wanted evidence showing clinical benefit. Frailty identification increased workload and was under-resourced, with limited time for, and access to, necessary interventions. GPs felt they lacked knowledge about frailty and more education was required to better understand it. CONCLUSION: Proactively identifying and responding to frailty in primary care requires GP education, highly sensitive and specific risk-stratification tools, better access to interventions to lessen the impact of frailty, and adequate resourcing to achieve potential clinical impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8252857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82528572021-07-14 Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study Mulla, Ebrahim Orton, Elizabeth Kendrick, Denise Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: In England, GPs are independent contractors working to a national contract. Since 2017, the contract requires GPs to use electronic tools to proactively identify moderate and severe frailty in people aged ≥65 years, and offer interventions to help those identified to stay well and maintain independent living. Little is currently known about GPs’ views of this contractual requirement. AIM: To explore GPs’ views of identifying frailty and offering interventions for those living with moderate or severe frailty. DESIGN AND SETTING: A sequential mixed-methods study of GPs in the East Midlands region of England — namely Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, and Northamptonshire — undertaken between January and May 2019. METHOD: GPs were made aware of the study via professional organisations’ newsletters and bulletins, GP email lists, and social media, and were invited to complete an online questionnaire. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and, based on those survey responses, GPs with a range of GP and practice characteristics, as well as views on identifying frailty, were selected to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview. Interview transcripts were analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS: In total, 188 out of 3058 (6.1%) GPs responded to the survey and 18 GPs were interviewed. GPs were broadly supportive of identifying frailty, but felt risk-stratification tools lacked sensitivity and specificity, and wanted evidence showing clinical benefit. Frailty identification increased workload and was under-resourced, with limited time for, and access to, necessary interventions. GPs felt they lacked knowledge about frailty and more education was required to better understand it. CONCLUSION: Proactively identifying and responding to frailty in primary care requires GP education, highly sensitive and specific risk-stratification tools, better access to interventions to lessen the impact of frailty, and adequate resourcing to achieve potential clinical impact. Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8252857/ /pubmed/33657008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0178 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
Mulla, Ebrahim
Orton, Elizabeth
Kendrick, Denise
Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study
title Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study
title_full Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study
title_short Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study
title_sort is proactive frailty identification a good idea? a qualitative interview study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8252857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33657008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0178
work_keys_str_mv AT mullaebrahim isproactivefrailtyidentificationagoodideaaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT ortonelizabeth isproactivefrailtyidentificationagoodideaaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT kendrickdenise isproactivefrailtyidentificationagoodideaaqualitativeinterviewstudy