Cargando…

Intraoperative Comparison of 2D versus 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Quantitative Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND: Effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) can be represented by 3D echocardiographic vena contracta cross-sectional area (3D-VCA) as a reference method for the quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) without making any geometrical assumptions. EROA can also be derived from 3D PISA te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lovhale, Pravin S., Gadhinglajkar, Shrinivas, Sreedhar, Rupa, Sukesan, Subin, Pillai, Vivek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33884971
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_28_20
_version_ 1783717420811157504
author Lovhale, Pravin S.
Gadhinglajkar, Shrinivas
Sreedhar, Rupa
Sukesan, Subin
Pillai, Vivek
author_facet Lovhale, Pravin S.
Gadhinglajkar, Shrinivas
Sreedhar, Rupa
Sukesan, Subin
Pillai, Vivek
author_sort Lovhale, Pravin S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) can be represented by 3D echocardiographic vena contracta cross-sectional area (3D-VCA) as a reference method for the quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) without making any geometrical assumptions. EROA can also be derived from 3D PISA technique with a hemispherical (HS) or hemielliptical (HE) assumption of the proximal flow convergence. However, it is not clear whether HS-PISA and HE-PISA has better agreement with 3D-VCA. AIMS: This study was conducted to compare the EROA and Rvol obtained from 3D-VCA with those obtained from 2D-VC, 2D-HS-PISA, 3D-HS-PISA, and 3D-HE-PISA. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After anesthesia induction, 43 consecutive patients were evaluated with RT-3D-TEE after acquiring images from midesophegeal views and performing the offline analysis of volume dataset. 3D-VCA was measured using multiplanar reconstruction mode and EROA and regurgitant volume were estimated using HS-PISA and HE-PISA methods. The HE-PISA was calculated by using the Knud Thomsen formula. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Agreement between methods to estimate EROA and regurgitant volumes were tested using Bland–Altman analysis. The interobserver variability and intraobserver variability were assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The EROA estimated by 3D-VCA was larger than EROA obtained by 2D-HS-PISA and 3D-HS-PISA, which were significantly greater than 3D-HE-PISA. 3D-HS-PISA-EROA showed the best agreement with 3D-VCA (bias: 0.21; limits of agreement: −0.01 to 0.41; SD: 0.1). Correlation between various methods as compared to 3D-VCA was better in the organic MR group than functional MR group. CONCLUSION: 3D-HS-PISA showed the best agreement with 3D-VCA compared to other PISA methods. Better correlation between PISA-EROA and 3D-VCA was observed in patients with organic MR than functional MR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8253015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82530152021-07-09 Intraoperative Comparison of 2D versus 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Quantitative Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation Lovhale, Pravin S. Gadhinglajkar, Shrinivas Sreedhar, Rupa Sukesan, Subin Pillai, Vivek Ann Card Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) can be represented by 3D echocardiographic vena contracta cross-sectional area (3D-VCA) as a reference method for the quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) without making any geometrical assumptions. EROA can also be derived from 3D PISA technique with a hemispherical (HS) or hemielliptical (HE) assumption of the proximal flow convergence. However, it is not clear whether HS-PISA and HE-PISA has better agreement with 3D-VCA. AIMS: This study was conducted to compare the EROA and Rvol obtained from 3D-VCA with those obtained from 2D-VC, 2D-HS-PISA, 3D-HS-PISA, and 3D-HE-PISA. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After anesthesia induction, 43 consecutive patients were evaluated with RT-3D-TEE after acquiring images from midesophegeal views and performing the offline analysis of volume dataset. 3D-VCA was measured using multiplanar reconstruction mode and EROA and regurgitant volume were estimated using HS-PISA and HE-PISA methods. The HE-PISA was calculated by using the Knud Thomsen formula. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Agreement between methods to estimate EROA and regurgitant volumes were tested using Bland–Altman analysis. The interobserver variability and intraobserver variability were assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The EROA estimated by 3D-VCA was larger than EROA obtained by 2D-HS-PISA and 3D-HS-PISA, which were significantly greater than 3D-HE-PISA. 3D-HS-PISA-EROA showed the best agreement with 3D-VCA (bias: 0.21; limits of agreement: −0.01 to 0.41; SD: 0.1). Correlation between various methods as compared to 3D-VCA was better in the organic MR group than functional MR group. CONCLUSION: 3D-HS-PISA showed the best agreement with 3D-VCA compared to other PISA methods. Better correlation between PISA-EROA and 3D-VCA was observed in patients with organic MR than functional MR. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8253015/ /pubmed/33884971 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_28_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lovhale, Pravin S.
Gadhinglajkar, Shrinivas
Sreedhar, Rupa
Sukesan, Subin
Pillai, Vivek
Intraoperative Comparison of 2D versus 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Quantitative Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation
title Intraoperative Comparison of 2D versus 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Quantitative Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation
title_full Intraoperative Comparison of 2D versus 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Quantitative Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation
title_fullStr Intraoperative Comparison of 2D versus 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Quantitative Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Comparison of 2D versus 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Quantitative Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation
title_short Intraoperative Comparison of 2D versus 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Quantitative Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation
title_sort intraoperative comparison of 2d versus 3d transesophageal echocardiography for quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33884971
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_28_20
work_keys_str_mv AT lovhalepravins intraoperativecomparisonof2dversus3dtransesophagealechocardiographyforquantitativeassessmentofmitralregurgitation
AT gadhinglajkarshrinivas intraoperativecomparisonof2dversus3dtransesophagealechocardiographyforquantitativeassessmentofmitralregurgitation
AT sreedharrupa intraoperativecomparisonof2dversus3dtransesophagealechocardiographyforquantitativeassessmentofmitralregurgitation
AT sukesansubin intraoperativecomparisonof2dversus3dtransesophagealechocardiographyforquantitativeassessmentofmitralregurgitation
AT pillaivivek intraoperativecomparisonof2dversus3dtransesophagealechocardiographyforquantitativeassessmentofmitralregurgitation