Cargando…

Clinical Efficacy of Levosimendan vs Milrinone in Preventing Low Cardiac Output Syndrome Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic milrinone is commonly used to prevent Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS) after pediatric cardiac surgery. This study compares the use of levosimendan with milrinone when used as the primary inotrope following pediatric cardiac surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty infants und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jothinath, Kaushik, Balakrishnan, Soundaravalli, Raju, Vijayakumar, Menon, Shoba, Osborn, Jenit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33884979
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_160_19
_version_ 1783717421291405312
author Jothinath, Kaushik
Balakrishnan, Soundaravalli
Raju, Vijayakumar
Menon, Shoba
Osborn, Jenit
author_facet Jothinath, Kaushik
Balakrishnan, Soundaravalli
Raju, Vijayakumar
Menon, Shoba
Osborn, Jenit
author_sort Jothinath, Kaushik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prophylactic milrinone is commonly used to prevent Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS) after pediatric cardiac surgery. This study compares the use of levosimendan with milrinone when used as the primary inotrope following pediatric cardiac surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty infants undergoing corrective surgery for congenital heart disease were recruited during the study and randomized into two groups (group L and group M). During rewarming, a loading dose of levosimendan or milrinone was administered followed by a 24-hour infusion of the chosen inotrope. Echocardiographic variables were measured postoperatively. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS-20 computer package. Association between the variables was found by independent t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Mean age and weight of the patient in Group L was 8.55 ± 5.83 months and 6.05 ± 2.09 kgs, while that in group M was 6.85 ± 3.57 months and 5.26 ± 2.11 kgs. 4 patients (20%) treated with levosimendan had LCOS in comparison with 6 (30%) patients in those treated with milrinone. Echocardiographic parameters in both groups L and M were comparable (cardiac index 3.47 ± 0.76 vs 3.72 ± 1.05 L/min/m(2), EF 66.10 ± 7.82% vs 59.34 ± 10.74%, stroke volume index 25.4 ± 6.3 vs 27.74 ± 10.35 mL/m(2)). The duration of ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay were lesser in group L (12.75 ± 9.69, 35.95 ± 12.11, 119.10 ± 46.397 vs 23.60 ± 22.03, 51.20 ± 29.92, 140.20 ± 52.65 hours). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of LCOS was lesser in those patients treated with levosimendan, when compared with those treated with milrinone. Cardiac index and stroke volume index were comparable between the two groups. Thus, levosimendan provides a non-inferior alternative to milrinone when used as the primary inotrope following pediatric cardiac surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8253017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82530172021-07-09 Clinical Efficacy of Levosimendan vs Milrinone in Preventing Low Cardiac Output Syndrome Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Jothinath, Kaushik Balakrishnan, Soundaravalli Raju, Vijayakumar Menon, Shoba Osborn, Jenit Ann Card Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Prophylactic milrinone is commonly used to prevent Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS) after pediatric cardiac surgery. This study compares the use of levosimendan with milrinone when used as the primary inotrope following pediatric cardiac surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty infants undergoing corrective surgery for congenital heart disease were recruited during the study and randomized into two groups (group L and group M). During rewarming, a loading dose of levosimendan or milrinone was administered followed by a 24-hour infusion of the chosen inotrope. Echocardiographic variables were measured postoperatively. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS-20 computer package. Association between the variables was found by independent t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Mean age and weight of the patient in Group L was 8.55 ± 5.83 months and 6.05 ± 2.09 kgs, while that in group M was 6.85 ± 3.57 months and 5.26 ± 2.11 kgs. 4 patients (20%) treated with levosimendan had LCOS in comparison with 6 (30%) patients in those treated with milrinone. Echocardiographic parameters in both groups L and M were comparable (cardiac index 3.47 ± 0.76 vs 3.72 ± 1.05 L/min/m(2), EF 66.10 ± 7.82% vs 59.34 ± 10.74%, stroke volume index 25.4 ± 6.3 vs 27.74 ± 10.35 mL/m(2)). The duration of ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay were lesser in group L (12.75 ± 9.69, 35.95 ± 12.11, 119.10 ± 46.397 vs 23.60 ± 22.03, 51.20 ± 29.92, 140.20 ± 52.65 hours). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of LCOS was lesser in those patients treated with levosimendan, when compared with those treated with milrinone. Cardiac index and stroke volume index were comparable between the two groups. Thus, levosimendan provides a non-inferior alternative to milrinone when used as the primary inotrope following pediatric cardiac surgery. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8253017/ /pubmed/33884979 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_160_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jothinath, Kaushik
Balakrishnan, Soundaravalli
Raju, Vijayakumar
Menon, Shoba
Osborn, Jenit
Clinical Efficacy of Levosimendan vs Milrinone in Preventing Low Cardiac Output Syndrome Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
title Clinical Efficacy of Levosimendan vs Milrinone in Preventing Low Cardiac Output Syndrome Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
title_full Clinical Efficacy of Levosimendan vs Milrinone in Preventing Low Cardiac Output Syndrome Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
title_fullStr Clinical Efficacy of Levosimendan vs Milrinone in Preventing Low Cardiac Output Syndrome Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Efficacy of Levosimendan vs Milrinone in Preventing Low Cardiac Output Syndrome Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
title_short Clinical Efficacy of Levosimendan vs Milrinone in Preventing Low Cardiac Output Syndrome Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
title_sort clinical efficacy of levosimendan vs milrinone in preventing low cardiac output syndrome following pediatric cardiac surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33884979
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_160_19
work_keys_str_mv AT jothinathkaushik clinicalefficacyoflevosimendanvsmilrinoneinpreventinglowcardiacoutputsyndromefollowingpediatriccardiacsurgery
AT balakrishnansoundaravalli clinicalefficacyoflevosimendanvsmilrinoneinpreventinglowcardiacoutputsyndromefollowingpediatriccardiacsurgery
AT rajuvijayakumar clinicalefficacyoflevosimendanvsmilrinoneinpreventinglowcardiacoutputsyndromefollowingpediatriccardiacsurgery
AT menonshoba clinicalefficacyoflevosimendanvsmilrinoneinpreventinglowcardiacoutputsyndromefollowingpediatriccardiacsurgery
AT osbornjenit clinicalefficacyoflevosimendanvsmilrinoneinpreventinglowcardiacoutputsyndromefollowingpediatriccardiacsurgery