Cargando…
Feasibility and outcomes of ERAS protocol in elective cT4 colorectal cancer patients: results from a single-center retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Programs of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery reduces morbidity and shorten recovery in patients undergoing colorectal resections for cancer. Patients presenting with more advanced disease such as T4 cancers are frequently excluded from undergoing ERAS programs due to the difficulty in app...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02282-7 |
_version_ | 1783717467605958656 |
---|---|
author | Bellato, Vittoria An, Yongbo Cerbo, Daniele Campanelli, Michela Franceschilli, Marzia Khanna, Krishn Sensi, Bruno Siragusa, Leandro Rossi, Piero Sica, Giuseppe S. |
author_facet | Bellato, Vittoria An, Yongbo Cerbo, Daniele Campanelli, Michela Franceschilli, Marzia Khanna, Krishn Sensi, Bruno Siragusa, Leandro Rossi, Piero Sica, Giuseppe S. |
author_sort | Bellato, Vittoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Programs of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery reduces morbidity and shorten recovery in patients undergoing colorectal resections for cancer. Patients presenting with more advanced disease such as T4 cancers are frequently excluded from undergoing ERAS programs due to the difficulty in applying established protocols. The primary aim of this investigation was to evaluate the possibility of applying a validated ERAS protocol in patients undergoing colorectal resection for T4 colon and rectal cancer and to evaluate the short-term outcome. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of stage T4 colorectal cancer undergoing surgery between November 2016 and January 2020 were treated following the institutional fast track protocol without exclusion. Short-term postoperative outcomes were compared to those of a control group treated with conventional care and that underwent surgical resection for T4 colorectal cancer at the same institution from January 2010 to October 2016. Data from both groups were collected retrospectively from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were diagnosed with T4 cancer, 49 patients were included in the ERAS cohort and 33 in the historical conventional care cohort. Both, the mean time of tolerance to solid food diet and postoperative length of stay were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the control group (3.14 ± 1.76 vs 4.8 ± 1.52; p < 0.0001 and 6.93 ± 3.76 vs 9.50 ± 4.83; p = 0.0084 respectively). No differences in perioperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this cohort study from a single-center registry support the thesis that the adoption of the ERAS protocol is effective and applicable in patients with colorectal cancer clinically staged T4, reducing significantly their length of stay and time of tolerance to solid food diet, without affecting surgical postoperative outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8253238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82532382021-07-06 Feasibility and outcomes of ERAS protocol in elective cT4 colorectal cancer patients: results from a single-center retrospective cohort study Bellato, Vittoria An, Yongbo Cerbo, Daniele Campanelli, Michela Franceschilli, Marzia Khanna, Krishn Sensi, Bruno Siragusa, Leandro Rossi, Piero Sica, Giuseppe S. World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Programs of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery reduces morbidity and shorten recovery in patients undergoing colorectal resections for cancer. Patients presenting with more advanced disease such as T4 cancers are frequently excluded from undergoing ERAS programs due to the difficulty in applying established protocols. The primary aim of this investigation was to evaluate the possibility of applying a validated ERAS protocol in patients undergoing colorectal resection for T4 colon and rectal cancer and to evaluate the short-term outcome. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of stage T4 colorectal cancer undergoing surgery between November 2016 and January 2020 were treated following the institutional fast track protocol without exclusion. Short-term postoperative outcomes were compared to those of a control group treated with conventional care and that underwent surgical resection for T4 colorectal cancer at the same institution from January 2010 to October 2016. Data from both groups were collected retrospectively from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were diagnosed with T4 cancer, 49 patients were included in the ERAS cohort and 33 in the historical conventional care cohort. Both, the mean time of tolerance to solid food diet and postoperative length of stay were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the control group (3.14 ± 1.76 vs 4.8 ± 1.52; p < 0.0001 and 6.93 ± 3.76 vs 9.50 ± 4.83; p = 0.0084 respectively). No differences in perioperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this cohort study from a single-center registry support the thesis that the adoption of the ERAS protocol is effective and applicable in patients with colorectal cancer clinically staged T4, reducing significantly their length of stay and time of tolerance to solid food diet, without affecting surgical postoperative outcomes. BioMed Central 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8253238/ /pubmed/34215273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02282-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bellato, Vittoria An, Yongbo Cerbo, Daniele Campanelli, Michela Franceschilli, Marzia Khanna, Krishn Sensi, Bruno Siragusa, Leandro Rossi, Piero Sica, Giuseppe S. Feasibility and outcomes of ERAS protocol in elective cT4 colorectal cancer patients: results from a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title | Feasibility and outcomes of ERAS protocol in elective cT4 colorectal cancer patients: results from a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Feasibility and outcomes of ERAS protocol in elective cT4 colorectal cancer patients: results from a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and outcomes of ERAS protocol in elective cT4 colorectal cancer patients: results from a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and outcomes of ERAS protocol in elective cT4 colorectal cancer patients: results from a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Feasibility and outcomes of ERAS protocol in elective cT4 colorectal cancer patients: results from a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | feasibility and outcomes of eras protocol in elective ct4 colorectal cancer patients: results from a single-center retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02282-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bellatovittoria feasibilityandoutcomesoferasprotocolinelectivect4colorectalcancerpatientsresultsfromasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT anyongbo feasibilityandoutcomesoferasprotocolinelectivect4colorectalcancerpatientsresultsfromasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT cerbodaniele feasibilityandoutcomesoferasprotocolinelectivect4colorectalcancerpatientsresultsfromasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT campanellimichela feasibilityandoutcomesoferasprotocolinelectivect4colorectalcancerpatientsresultsfromasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT franceschillimarzia feasibilityandoutcomesoferasprotocolinelectivect4colorectalcancerpatientsresultsfromasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT khannakrishn feasibilityandoutcomesoferasprotocolinelectivect4colorectalcancerpatientsresultsfromasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT sensibruno feasibilityandoutcomesoferasprotocolinelectivect4colorectalcancerpatientsresultsfromasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT siragusaleandro feasibilityandoutcomesoferasprotocolinelectivect4colorectalcancerpatientsresultsfromasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT rossipiero feasibilityandoutcomesoferasprotocolinelectivect4colorectalcancerpatientsresultsfromasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT sicagiuseppes feasibilityandoutcomesoferasprotocolinelectivect4colorectalcancerpatientsresultsfromasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy |