Cargando…

Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and validation for Brazil

OBJECTIVE: to adapt the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified (SET-M) to Portuguese and to verify validity and reliability indexes. METHOD: methodological study using ISPOR, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, correlation between the adapted instrument/Simulation Design Scale - Student Version/Individu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergamasco, Ellen Cristina, da Cruz, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4282.3437
_version_ 1783717490550898688
author Bergamasco, Ellen Cristina
da Cruz, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro
author_facet Bergamasco, Ellen Cristina
da Cruz, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro
author_sort Bergamasco, Ellen Cristina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to adapt the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified (SET-M) to Portuguese and to verify validity and reliability indexes. METHOD: methodological study using ISPOR, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, correlation between the adapted instrument/Simulation Design Scale - Student Version/Individual Practice Assessment and reliability (test-retest and internal consistency indexes). Convenience sample with a total of 435 Nursing undergraduate and graduate students. RESULTS: Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version obtained an average score between 2.36 to 2.94. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis had a factor load > 0.30 for 17 of the 19 items. Cronbach’s alpha ranged between 0.729 and 0.874. McDonald’s omega was 0.782. There was no correlation between Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version and the Simulation Design or Individual Practical Assessment. There was a positive correlation between the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version and the participants’ age. The scores of the volunteers in the simulations were significantly higher than those of the observers in three domains. CONCLUSION: the SET-M Brazilian Version, maintaining the 19 items and four domains of the original scale, was made available for use in Brazil to evaluate the effectiveness of the simulation, recommending studies with different samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8253340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82533402021-07-13 Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and validation for Brazil Bergamasco, Ellen Cristina da Cruz, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Article OBJECTIVE: to adapt the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified (SET-M) to Portuguese and to verify validity and reliability indexes. METHOD: methodological study using ISPOR, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, correlation between the adapted instrument/Simulation Design Scale - Student Version/Individual Practice Assessment and reliability (test-retest and internal consistency indexes). Convenience sample with a total of 435 Nursing undergraduate and graduate students. RESULTS: Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version obtained an average score between 2.36 to 2.94. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis had a factor load > 0.30 for 17 of the 19 items. Cronbach’s alpha ranged between 0.729 and 0.874. McDonald’s omega was 0.782. There was no correlation between Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version and the Simulation Design or Individual Practical Assessment. There was a positive correlation between the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version and the participants’ age. The scores of the volunteers in the simulations were significantly higher than those of the observers in three domains. CONCLUSION: the SET-M Brazilian Version, maintaining the 19 items and four domains of the original scale, was made available for use in Brazil to evaluate the effectiveness of the simulation, recommending studies with different samples. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8253340/ /pubmed/34190938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4282.3437 Text en Copyright © 2020 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bergamasco, Ellen Cristina
da Cruz, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro
Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and validation for Brazil
title Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and validation for Brazil
title_full Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and validation for Brazil
title_fullStr Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and validation for Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and validation for Brazil
title_short Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and validation for Brazil
title_sort simulation effectiveness tool modified (set-m): adaptation and validation for brazil
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4282.3437
work_keys_str_mv AT bergamascoellencristina simulationeffectivenesstoolmodifiedsetmadaptationandvalidationforbrazil
AT dacruzdinadealmeidalopesmonteiro simulationeffectivenesstoolmodifiedsetmadaptationandvalidationforbrazil