Cargando…
Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and validation for Brazil
OBJECTIVE: to adapt the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified (SET-M) to Portuguese and to verify validity and reliability indexes. METHOD: methodological study using ISPOR, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, correlation between the adapted instrument/Simulation Design Scale - Student Version/Individu...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4282.3437 |
_version_ | 1783717490550898688 |
---|---|
author | Bergamasco, Ellen Cristina da Cruz, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro |
author_facet | Bergamasco, Ellen Cristina da Cruz, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro |
author_sort | Bergamasco, Ellen Cristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: to adapt the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified (SET-M) to Portuguese and to verify validity and reliability indexes. METHOD: methodological study using ISPOR, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, correlation between the adapted instrument/Simulation Design Scale - Student Version/Individual Practice Assessment and reliability (test-retest and internal consistency indexes). Convenience sample with a total of 435 Nursing undergraduate and graduate students. RESULTS: Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version obtained an average score between 2.36 to 2.94. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis had a factor load > 0.30 for 17 of the 19 items. Cronbach’s alpha ranged between 0.729 and 0.874. McDonald’s omega was 0.782. There was no correlation between Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version and the Simulation Design or Individual Practical Assessment. There was a positive correlation between the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version and the participants’ age. The scores of the volunteers in the simulations were significantly higher than those of the observers in three domains. CONCLUSION: the SET-M Brazilian Version, maintaining the 19 items and four domains of the original scale, was made available for use in Brazil to evaluate the effectiveness of the simulation, recommending studies with different samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8253340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82533402021-07-13 Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and validation for Brazil Bergamasco, Ellen Cristina da Cruz, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Article OBJECTIVE: to adapt the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified (SET-M) to Portuguese and to verify validity and reliability indexes. METHOD: methodological study using ISPOR, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, correlation between the adapted instrument/Simulation Design Scale - Student Version/Individual Practice Assessment and reliability (test-retest and internal consistency indexes). Convenience sample with a total of 435 Nursing undergraduate and graduate students. RESULTS: Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version obtained an average score between 2.36 to 2.94. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis had a factor load > 0.30 for 17 of the 19 items. Cronbach’s alpha ranged between 0.729 and 0.874. McDonald’s omega was 0.782. There was no correlation between Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version and the Simulation Design or Individual Practical Assessment. There was a positive correlation between the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Brazilian Version and the participants’ age. The scores of the volunteers in the simulations were significantly higher than those of the observers in three domains. CONCLUSION: the SET-M Brazilian Version, maintaining the 19 items and four domains of the original scale, was made available for use in Brazil to evaluate the effectiveness of the simulation, recommending studies with different samples. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8253340/ /pubmed/34190938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4282.3437 Text en Copyright © 2020 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bergamasco, Ellen Cristina da Cruz, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and validation for Brazil |
title | Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and
validation for Brazil
|
title_full | Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and
validation for Brazil
|
title_fullStr | Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and
validation for Brazil
|
title_full_unstemmed | Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and
validation for Brazil
|
title_short | Simulation effectiveness tool modified (SET-M): adaptation and
validation for Brazil
|
title_sort | simulation effectiveness tool modified (set-m): adaptation and
validation for brazil |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4282.3437 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergamascoellencristina simulationeffectivenesstoolmodifiedsetmadaptationandvalidationforbrazil AT dacruzdinadealmeidalopesmonteiro simulationeffectivenesstoolmodifiedsetmadaptationandvalidationforbrazil |