Cargando…

Less need for differentiation? Intestinal length of reptiles as compared to mammals

Although relationships between intestinal morphology between trophic groups in reptiles are widely assumed and represent a cornerstone of ecomorphological narratives, few comparative approaches actually tested this hypothesis on a larger scale. We collected data on lengths of intestinal sections of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoppe, Monika I., Meloro, Carlo, Edwards, Mark S., Codron, Daryl, Clauss, Marcus, Duque-Correa, María J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34214090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253182
_version_ 1783717503911854080
author Hoppe, Monika I.
Meloro, Carlo
Edwards, Mark S.
Codron, Daryl
Clauss, Marcus
Duque-Correa, María J.
author_facet Hoppe, Monika I.
Meloro, Carlo
Edwards, Mark S.
Codron, Daryl
Clauss, Marcus
Duque-Correa, María J.
author_sort Hoppe, Monika I.
collection PubMed
description Although relationships between intestinal morphology between trophic groups in reptiles are widely assumed and represent a cornerstone of ecomorphological narratives, few comparative approaches actually tested this hypothesis on a larger scale. We collected data on lengths of intestinal sections of 205 reptile species for which either body mass (BM), snout-vent-length (SVL) or carapax length (CL) was recorded, transforming SVL or CL into BM if the latter was not given, and analyzed scaling patterns with BM and SVL, accounting for phylogeny, comparing three trophic guilds (faunivores, omnivores, herbivores), and comparing with a mammal dataset. Length-BM relationships in reptiles were stronger for the small than the large intestine, suggesting that for the latter, additional factors might be relevant. Adding trophic level did not consistently improve model fit; only when controlling for phylogeny, models indicated a longer large intestine in herbivores, due to a corresponding pattern in lizards. Trophic level effects were highly susceptible to sample sizes, and not considered strong. Models that linked BM to intestine length had better support than models using SVL, due to the deviating body shape of snakes. At comparable BM, reptiles had shorter intestines than mammals. While the latter finding corresponds to findings of lower tissue masses for the digestive tract and other organs in reptiles as well as our understanding of differences in energetic requirements between the classes, they raise the hitherto unanswered question what it is that reptiles of similar BM have more than mammals. A lesser effect of trophic level on intestine lengths in reptiles compared to mammals may stem from lesser selective pressures on differentiation between trophic guilds, related to the generally lower food intake and different movement patterns of reptiles, which may not similarly escalate evolutionary arms races tuned to optimal agility as between mammalian predators and prey.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8253402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82534022021-07-13 Less need for differentiation? Intestinal length of reptiles as compared to mammals Hoppe, Monika I. Meloro, Carlo Edwards, Mark S. Codron, Daryl Clauss, Marcus Duque-Correa, María J. PLoS One Research Article Although relationships between intestinal morphology between trophic groups in reptiles are widely assumed and represent a cornerstone of ecomorphological narratives, few comparative approaches actually tested this hypothesis on a larger scale. We collected data on lengths of intestinal sections of 205 reptile species for which either body mass (BM), snout-vent-length (SVL) or carapax length (CL) was recorded, transforming SVL or CL into BM if the latter was not given, and analyzed scaling patterns with BM and SVL, accounting for phylogeny, comparing three trophic guilds (faunivores, omnivores, herbivores), and comparing with a mammal dataset. Length-BM relationships in reptiles were stronger for the small than the large intestine, suggesting that for the latter, additional factors might be relevant. Adding trophic level did not consistently improve model fit; only when controlling for phylogeny, models indicated a longer large intestine in herbivores, due to a corresponding pattern in lizards. Trophic level effects were highly susceptible to sample sizes, and not considered strong. Models that linked BM to intestine length had better support than models using SVL, due to the deviating body shape of snakes. At comparable BM, reptiles had shorter intestines than mammals. While the latter finding corresponds to findings of lower tissue masses for the digestive tract and other organs in reptiles as well as our understanding of differences in energetic requirements between the classes, they raise the hitherto unanswered question what it is that reptiles of similar BM have more than mammals. A lesser effect of trophic level on intestine lengths in reptiles compared to mammals may stem from lesser selective pressures on differentiation between trophic guilds, related to the generally lower food intake and different movement patterns of reptiles, which may not similarly escalate evolutionary arms races tuned to optimal agility as between mammalian predators and prey. Public Library of Science 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8253402/ /pubmed/34214090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253182 Text en © 2021 Hoppe et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hoppe, Monika I.
Meloro, Carlo
Edwards, Mark S.
Codron, Daryl
Clauss, Marcus
Duque-Correa, María J.
Less need for differentiation? Intestinal length of reptiles as compared to mammals
title Less need for differentiation? Intestinal length of reptiles as compared to mammals
title_full Less need for differentiation? Intestinal length of reptiles as compared to mammals
title_fullStr Less need for differentiation? Intestinal length of reptiles as compared to mammals
title_full_unstemmed Less need for differentiation? Intestinal length of reptiles as compared to mammals
title_short Less need for differentiation? Intestinal length of reptiles as compared to mammals
title_sort less need for differentiation? intestinal length of reptiles as compared to mammals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34214090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253182
work_keys_str_mv AT hoppemonikai lessneedfordifferentiationintestinallengthofreptilesascomparedtomammals
AT melorocarlo lessneedfordifferentiationintestinallengthofreptilesascomparedtomammals
AT edwardsmarks lessneedfordifferentiationintestinallengthofreptilesascomparedtomammals
AT codrondaryl lessneedfordifferentiationintestinallengthofreptilesascomparedtomammals
AT claussmarcus lessneedfordifferentiationintestinallengthofreptilesascomparedtomammals
AT duquecorreamariaj lessneedfordifferentiationintestinallengthofreptilesascomparedtomammals