Cargando…

Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion

Sacroiliac (SI) joint pathology is a newly appreciated contributor to lower back pain. Sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) has grown rapidly in popularity in association with the advent of minimally-invasive surgical techniques. This has led to an explosion of new medical devices used for SIJF. The objec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Himstead, Alexander S, Brown, Nolan J, Shahrestani, Shane, Tran, Katelynn, Davies, Jordan L, Oh, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34249562
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15415
_version_ 1783717520775053312
author Himstead, Alexander S
Brown, Nolan J
Shahrestani, Shane
Tran, Katelynn
Davies, Jordan L
Oh, Michael
author_facet Himstead, Alexander S
Brown, Nolan J
Shahrestani, Shane
Tran, Katelynn
Davies, Jordan L
Oh, Michael
author_sort Himstead, Alexander S
collection PubMed
description Sacroiliac (SI) joint pathology is a newly appreciated contributor to lower back pain. Sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) has grown rapidly in popularity in association with the advent of minimally-invasive surgical techniques. This has led to an explosion of new medical devices used for SIJF. The objective of this article is to outline clinical trends, summarize the current data, and categorize novel devices for SIJF. Trends in SI joint pathology and fusion were obtained via the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database and Web of Science. To review literature on devices for SIJF, PubMed was searched using the Boolean phrase “sacroiliac joint AND (fusion OR arthrodesis)” since 2010. To establish a list of SIJF devices not represented in the literature, searches were performed on the FDA 510(k), premarket approval, and de novo databases, as well as Google and LinkedIn. Literature review yielded 11 FDA-approved devices for minimally invasive SIJF. Database query yielded an additional 22 devices for a total of 33 devices. Twenty-one devices used the lateral transiliac approach, six posterior allograft approach, three posterolateral approach, and three combined the lateral transiliac and posterolateral approaches. The evidence for the lateral transiliac approach is the most robust. Many novel devices have been developed for minimally invasive SIJF over the past 10 years. Further randomized comparative trials are warranted to evaluate different surgical approaches and novel devices at this time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8253473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82534732021-07-09 Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Himstead, Alexander S Brown, Nolan J Shahrestani, Shane Tran, Katelynn Davies, Jordan L Oh, Michael Cureus Neurosurgery Sacroiliac (SI) joint pathology is a newly appreciated contributor to lower back pain. Sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) has grown rapidly in popularity in association with the advent of minimally-invasive surgical techniques. This has led to an explosion of new medical devices used for SIJF. The objective of this article is to outline clinical trends, summarize the current data, and categorize novel devices for SIJF. Trends in SI joint pathology and fusion were obtained via the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database and Web of Science. To review literature on devices for SIJF, PubMed was searched using the Boolean phrase “sacroiliac joint AND (fusion OR arthrodesis)” since 2010. To establish a list of SIJF devices not represented in the literature, searches were performed on the FDA 510(k), premarket approval, and de novo databases, as well as Google and LinkedIn. Literature review yielded 11 FDA-approved devices for minimally invasive SIJF. Database query yielded an additional 22 devices for a total of 33 devices. Twenty-one devices used the lateral transiliac approach, six posterior allograft approach, three posterolateral approach, and three combined the lateral transiliac and posterolateral approaches. The evidence for the lateral transiliac approach is the most robust. Many novel devices have been developed for minimally invasive SIJF over the past 10 years. Further randomized comparative trials are warranted to evaluate different surgical approaches and novel devices at this time. Cureus 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8253473/ /pubmed/34249562 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15415 Text en Copyright © 2021, Himstead et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurosurgery
Himstead, Alexander S
Brown, Nolan J
Shahrestani, Shane
Tran, Katelynn
Davies, Jordan L
Oh, Michael
Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
title Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
title_full Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
title_fullStr Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
title_short Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology Over the Past 10 Years: Review of Scientific Evidence for New Devices for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
title_sort trends in diagnosis and treatment of sacroiliac joint pathology over the past 10 years: review of scientific evidence for new devices for sacroiliac joint fusion
topic Neurosurgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34249562
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15415
work_keys_str_mv AT himsteadalexanders trendsindiagnosisandtreatmentofsacroiliacjointpathologyoverthepast10yearsreviewofscientificevidencefornewdevicesforsacroiliacjointfusion
AT brownnolanj trendsindiagnosisandtreatmentofsacroiliacjointpathologyoverthepast10yearsreviewofscientificevidencefornewdevicesforsacroiliacjointfusion
AT shahrestanishane trendsindiagnosisandtreatmentofsacroiliacjointpathologyoverthepast10yearsreviewofscientificevidencefornewdevicesforsacroiliacjointfusion
AT trankatelynn trendsindiagnosisandtreatmentofsacroiliacjointpathologyoverthepast10yearsreviewofscientificevidencefornewdevicesforsacroiliacjointfusion
AT daviesjordanl trendsindiagnosisandtreatmentofsacroiliacjointpathologyoverthepast10yearsreviewofscientificevidencefornewdevicesforsacroiliacjointfusion
AT ohmichael trendsindiagnosisandtreatmentofsacroiliacjointpathologyoverthepast10yearsreviewofscientificevidencefornewdevicesforsacroiliacjointfusion