Cargando…
Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS
Changes in cellular chromatin states fine-tune transcriptional output and ultimately lead to phenotypic changes. Here we propose a novel application of our reproducibility-optimized test statistics (ROTS) to detect differential chromatin states (ATAC-seq) or differential chromatin modification state...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab059 |
_version_ | 1783717537198899200 |
---|---|
author | Faux, Thomas Rytkönen, Kalle T Mahmoudian, Mehrad Paulin, Niklas Junttila, Sini Laiho, Asta Elo, Laura L |
author_facet | Faux, Thomas Rytkönen, Kalle T Mahmoudian, Mehrad Paulin, Niklas Junttila, Sini Laiho, Asta Elo, Laura L |
author_sort | Faux, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Changes in cellular chromatin states fine-tune transcriptional output and ultimately lead to phenotypic changes. Here we propose a novel application of our reproducibility-optimized test statistics (ROTS) to detect differential chromatin states (ATAC-seq) or differential chromatin modification states (ChIP-seq) between conditions. We compare the performance of ROTS to existing and widely used methods for ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq data using both synthetic and real datasets. Our results show that ROTS outperformed other commonly used methods when analyzing ATAC-seq data. ROTS also displayed the most accurate detection of small differences when modeling with synthetic data. We observed that two-step methods that require the use of a separate peak caller often more accurately called enrichment borders, whereas one-step methods without a separate peak calling step were more versatile in calling sub-peaks. The top ranked differential regions detected by the methods had marked correlation with transcriptional differences of the closest genes. Overall, our study provides evidence that ROTS is a useful addition to the available differential peak detection methods to study chromatin and performs especially well when applied to study differential chromatin states in ATAC-seq data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8253552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82535522021-07-06 Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS Faux, Thomas Rytkönen, Kalle T Mahmoudian, Mehrad Paulin, Niklas Junttila, Sini Laiho, Asta Elo, Laura L NAR Genom Bioinform Methods Article Changes in cellular chromatin states fine-tune transcriptional output and ultimately lead to phenotypic changes. Here we propose a novel application of our reproducibility-optimized test statistics (ROTS) to detect differential chromatin states (ATAC-seq) or differential chromatin modification states (ChIP-seq) between conditions. We compare the performance of ROTS to existing and widely used methods for ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq data using both synthetic and real datasets. Our results show that ROTS outperformed other commonly used methods when analyzing ATAC-seq data. ROTS also displayed the most accurate detection of small differences when modeling with synthetic data. We observed that two-step methods that require the use of a separate peak caller often more accurately called enrichment borders, whereas one-step methods without a separate peak calling step were more versatile in calling sub-peaks. The top ranked differential regions detected by the methods had marked correlation with transcriptional differences of the closest genes. Overall, our study provides evidence that ROTS is a useful addition to the available differential peak detection methods to study chromatin and performs especially well when applied to study differential chromatin states in ATAC-seq data. Oxford University Press 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8253552/ /pubmed/34235431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab059 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Article Faux, Thomas Rytkönen, Kalle T Mahmoudian, Mehrad Paulin, Niklas Junttila, Sini Laiho, Asta Elo, Laura L Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS |
title | Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS |
title_full | Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS |
title_fullStr | Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS |
title_short | Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS |
title_sort | differential atac-seq and chip-seq peak detection using rots |
topic | Methods Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fauxthomas differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots AT rytkonenkallet differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots AT mahmoudianmehrad differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots AT paulinniklas differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots AT junttilasini differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots AT laihoasta differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots AT elolaural differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots |