Cargando…

Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS

Changes in cellular chromatin states fine-tune transcriptional output and ultimately lead to phenotypic changes. Here we propose a novel application of our reproducibility-optimized test statistics (ROTS) to detect differential chromatin states (ATAC-seq) or differential chromatin modification state...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faux, Thomas, Rytkönen, Kalle T, Mahmoudian, Mehrad, Paulin, Niklas, Junttila, Sini, Laiho, Asta, Elo, Laura L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab059
_version_ 1783717537198899200
author Faux, Thomas
Rytkönen, Kalle T
Mahmoudian, Mehrad
Paulin, Niklas
Junttila, Sini
Laiho, Asta
Elo, Laura L
author_facet Faux, Thomas
Rytkönen, Kalle T
Mahmoudian, Mehrad
Paulin, Niklas
Junttila, Sini
Laiho, Asta
Elo, Laura L
author_sort Faux, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Changes in cellular chromatin states fine-tune transcriptional output and ultimately lead to phenotypic changes. Here we propose a novel application of our reproducibility-optimized test statistics (ROTS) to detect differential chromatin states (ATAC-seq) or differential chromatin modification states (ChIP-seq) between conditions. We compare the performance of ROTS to existing and widely used methods for ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq data using both synthetic and real datasets. Our results show that ROTS outperformed other commonly used methods when analyzing ATAC-seq data. ROTS also displayed the most accurate detection of small differences when modeling with synthetic data. We observed that two-step methods that require the use of a separate peak caller often more accurately called enrichment borders, whereas one-step methods without a separate peak calling step were more versatile in calling sub-peaks. The top ranked differential regions detected by the methods had marked correlation with transcriptional differences of the closest genes. Overall, our study provides evidence that ROTS is a useful addition to the available differential peak detection methods to study chromatin and performs especially well when applied to study differential chromatin states in ATAC-seq data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8253552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82535522021-07-06 Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS Faux, Thomas Rytkönen, Kalle T Mahmoudian, Mehrad Paulin, Niklas Junttila, Sini Laiho, Asta Elo, Laura L NAR Genom Bioinform Methods Article Changes in cellular chromatin states fine-tune transcriptional output and ultimately lead to phenotypic changes. Here we propose a novel application of our reproducibility-optimized test statistics (ROTS) to detect differential chromatin states (ATAC-seq) or differential chromatin modification states (ChIP-seq) between conditions. We compare the performance of ROTS to existing and widely used methods for ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq data using both synthetic and real datasets. Our results show that ROTS outperformed other commonly used methods when analyzing ATAC-seq data. ROTS also displayed the most accurate detection of small differences when modeling with synthetic data. We observed that two-step methods that require the use of a separate peak caller often more accurately called enrichment borders, whereas one-step methods without a separate peak calling step were more versatile in calling sub-peaks. The top ranked differential regions detected by the methods had marked correlation with transcriptional differences of the closest genes. Overall, our study provides evidence that ROTS is a useful addition to the available differential peak detection methods to study chromatin and performs especially well when applied to study differential chromatin states in ATAC-seq data. Oxford University Press 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8253552/ /pubmed/34235431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab059 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods Article
Faux, Thomas
Rytkönen, Kalle T
Mahmoudian, Mehrad
Paulin, Niklas
Junttila, Sini
Laiho, Asta
Elo, Laura L
Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS
title Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS
title_full Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS
title_fullStr Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS
title_full_unstemmed Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS
title_short Differential ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq peak detection using ROTS
title_sort differential atac-seq and chip-seq peak detection using rots
topic Methods Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab059
work_keys_str_mv AT fauxthomas differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots
AT rytkonenkallet differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots
AT mahmoudianmehrad differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots
AT paulinniklas differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots
AT junttilasini differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots
AT laihoasta differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots
AT elolaural differentialatacseqandchipseqpeakdetectionusingrots