Cargando…

High-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 group testing by digital PCR among symptomatic patients in hospital settings

BACKGROUND: Worldwide demand for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing is still high as testing remains central to follow the disease spread and vaccine efficacy. Group testing has been proposed as a solution to expand testing capabilities but sensitivity concerns may limit its impact on the management of the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Alexandra, Storto, Alexandre, Le Hingrat, Quentin, Collin, Gilles, André, Barbara, Mallory, Allison, Dangla, Rémi, Descamps, Diane, Visseaux, Benoit, Gossner, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34246075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104895
_version_ 1783717559374184448
author Martin, Alexandra
Storto, Alexandre
Le Hingrat, Quentin
Collin, Gilles
André, Barbara
Mallory, Allison
Dangla, Rémi
Descamps, Diane
Visseaux, Benoit
Gossner, Olivier
author_facet Martin, Alexandra
Storto, Alexandre
Le Hingrat, Quentin
Collin, Gilles
André, Barbara
Mallory, Allison
Dangla, Rémi
Descamps, Diane
Visseaux, Benoit
Gossner, Olivier
author_sort Martin, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Worldwide demand for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing is still high as testing remains central to follow the disease spread and vaccine efficacy. Group testing has been proposed as a solution to expand testing capabilities but sensitivity concerns may limit its impact on the management of the pandemic. Digital PCR (RT-dPCR) has been shown to be highly sensitive and could help by providing larger testing capabilities without compromising sensitivity. METHODS: We implemented RT-dPCR based COVID-19 group testing on a commercially available system and assay (naica® system from Stilla Technologies) and investigated the sensitivity of the method in real life conditions of a university hospital in Paris, France, in May 2020. We tested the protocol in a direct comparison with reference RT-PCR testing on 448 samples split into groups of 8, 16 and 32 samples for RT-dPCR analysis. RESULTS: Individual RT-PCR testing identified 25/448 positive samples. Using 56 groups of 8, RT-dPCR identified 23 groups as positive, corresponding to 26 positive samples by individual PCR (positive percentage agreement 95.2% [95% confidence interval: 76.2–99.9%]) and including 2 samples not detected by individual RT-PCR but confirmed positive by further investigation. 15 of 28 groups of 16 tested positive, corresponding to 25 positive samples by individual PCR (positive percentage agreement 87.5% [95% confidence interval: 61.7–98.4%]). 14 groups of 32 were fully concordant with individual PCR testing but will need to be confirmed on larger datasets. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed approach of group testing by digital PCR has similar diagnostic sensitivity compared to individual RT-PCR testing for group up to 16 samples. This approach reduces the quantity of reagent needed by up to 80% while reducing costs and increasing capabilities of testing up to 10-fold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8253657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82536572021-07-06 High-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 group testing by digital PCR among symptomatic patients in hospital settings Martin, Alexandra Storto, Alexandre Le Hingrat, Quentin Collin, Gilles André, Barbara Mallory, Allison Dangla, Rémi Descamps, Diane Visseaux, Benoit Gossner, Olivier J Clin Virol Article BACKGROUND: Worldwide demand for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing is still high as testing remains central to follow the disease spread and vaccine efficacy. Group testing has been proposed as a solution to expand testing capabilities but sensitivity concerns may limit its impact on the management of the pandemic. Digital PCR (RT-dPCR) has been shown to be highly sensitive and could help by providing larger testing capabilities without compromising sensitivity. METHODS: We implemented RT-dPCR based COVID-19 group testing on a commercially available system and assay (naica® system from Stilla Technologies) and investigated the sensitivity of the method in real life conditions of a university hospital in Paris, France, in May 2020. We tested the protocol in a direct comparison with reference RT-PCR testing on 448 samples split into groups of 8, 16 and 32 samples for RT-dPCR analysis. RESULTS: Individual RT-PCR testing identified 25/448 positive samples. Using 56 groups of 8, RT-dPCR identified 23 groups as positive, corresponding to 26 positive samples by individual PCR (positive percentage agreement 95.2% [95% confidence interval: 76.2–99.9%]) and including 2 samples not detected by individual RT-PCR but confirmed positive by further investigation. 15 of 28 groups of 16 tested positive, corresponding to 25 positive samples by individual PCR (positive percentage agreement 87.5% [95% confidence interval: 61.7–98.4%]). 14 groups of 32 were fully concordant with individual PCR testing but will need to be confirmed on larger datasets. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed approach of group testing by digital PCR has similar diagnostic sensitivity compared to individual RT-PCR testing for group up to 16 samples. This approach reduces the quantity of reagent needed by up to 80% while reducing costs and increasing capabilities of testing up to 10-fold. Elsevier B.V. 2021-08 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8253657/ /pubmed/34246075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104895 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Martin, Alexandra
Storto, Alexandre
Le Hingrat, Quentin
Collin, Gilles
André, Barbara
Mallory, Allison
Dangla, Rémi
Descamps, Diane
Visseaux, Benoit
Gossner, Olivier
High-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 group testing by digital PCR among symptomatic patients in hospital settings
title High-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 group testing by digital PCR among symptomatic patients in hospital settings
title_full High-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 group testing by digital PCR among symptomatic patients in hospital settings
title_fullStr High-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 group testing by digital PCR among symptomatic patients in hospital settings
title_full_unstemmed High-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 group testing by digital PCR among symptomatic patients in hospital settings
title_short High-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 group testing by digital PCR among symptomatic patients in hospital settings
title_sort high-sensitivity sars-cov-2 group testing by digital pcr among symptomatic patients in hospital settings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34246075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104895
work_keys_str_mv AT martinalexandra highsensitivitysarscov2grouptestingbydigitalpcramongsymptomaticpatientsinhospitalsettings
AT stortoalexandre highsensitivitysarscov2grouptestingbydigitalpcramongsymptomaticpatientsinhospitalsettings
AT lehingratquentin highsensitivitysarscov2grouptestingbydigitalpcramongsymptomaticpatientsinhospitalsettings
AT collingilles highsensitivitysarscov2grouptestingbydigitalpcramongsymptomaticpatientsinhospitalsettings
AT andrebarbara highsensitivitysarscov2grouptestingbydigitalpcramongsymptomaticpatientsinhospitalsettings
AT malloryallison highsensitivitysarscov2grouptestingbydigitalpcramongsymptomaticpatientsinhospitalsettings
AT danglaremi highsensitivitysarscov2grouptestingbydigitalpcramongsymptomaticpatientsinhospitalsettings
AT descampsdiane highsensitivitysarscov2grouptestingbydigitalpcramongsymptomaticpatientsinhospitalsettings
AT visseauxbenoit highsensitivitysarscov2grouptestingbydigitalpcramongsymptomaticpatientsinhospitalsettings
AT gossnerolivier highsensitivitysarscov2grouptestingbydigitalpcramongsymptomaticpatientsinhospitalsettings