Cargando…

Effect of different levels of PEEP on mortality in ICU patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether higher positive end- expiratory pressure (PEEP) could provide a survival advantage for patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) compared with lower PEEP. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified through searches of Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Shuai, Kang, Hanyujie, Qian, Zhenbei, Wang, Yingquan, Tong, Zhaohui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34274832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.06.015
_version_ 1783717567511134208
author Shao, Shuai
Kang, Hanyujie
Qian, Zhenbei
Wang, Yingquan
Tong, Zhaohui
author_facet Shao, Shuai
Kang, Hanyujie
Qian, Zhenbei
Wang, Yingquan
Tong, Zhaohui
author_sort Shao, Shuai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether higher positive end- expiratory pressure (PEEP) could provide a survival advantage for patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) compared with lower PEEP. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified through searches of Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, and Wanfang database from inception up to 1 June 2021. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used in this meta-analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified for further evaluation. Higher and lower PEEP arms included 1330 patients and 1650 patients, respectively. A mean level of 9.6±3.4 cmH(2)O was applied in the higher PEEP groups and 1.9±2.6 cmH(2)O was used in the lower PEEP groups. Higher PEEP, compared with lower PEEP, was not associated with reduction of all-cause mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.91–1.18; P =0.627), and 28-day mortality (RR 1.07 ; 95% CI 0.92–1.24; P =0.365). In terms of risk of ARDS (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24–0.78; P =0.005), duration of intensive care unit (MD -1.04; 95%CI-1.36 to −0.73; P < 0.00001), and oxygenation (MD 40.30; 95%CI 0.94 to 79.65; P = 0.045), higher PEEP was superior to lower PEEP. Besides, the pooled analysis showed no significant differences between groups both in the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD 0.00; 95%CI-0.13 to 0.13; P = 0.996) and hospital stay (MD -0.66; 95%CI-1.94 to 0.61; P = 0.309). More importantly, lower PEEP did not increase the risk of pneumonia, atelectasis, barotrauma, hypoxemia, or hypotension among patients compared with higher PEEP. The TSA analysis showed that the results of all-cause mortality and 28-day mortality might be false-negative results. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a lower PEEP ventilation strategy was non-inferior to a higher PEEP ventilation strategy in ICU patients without ARDS, with no increased risk of all-cause mortality and 28-day mortality. Further high-quality RCTs should be performed to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8253690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82536902021-07-06 Effect of different levels of PEEP on mortality in ICU patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis Shao, Shuai Kang, Hanyujie Qian, Zhenbei Wang, Yingquan Tong, Zhaohui J Crit Care Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether higher positive end- expiratory pressure (PEEP) could provide a survival advantage for patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) compared with lower PEEP. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified through searches of Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, and Wanfang database from inception up to 1 June 2021. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used in this meta-analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified for further evaluation. Higher and lower PEEP arms included 1330 patients and 1650 patients, respectively. A mean level of 9.6±3.4 cmH(2)O was applied in the higher PEEP groups and 1.9±2.6 cmH(2)O was used in the lower PEEP groups. Higher PEEP, compared with lower PEEP, was not associated with reduction of all-cause mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.91–1.18; P =0.627), and 28-day mortality (RR 1.07 ; 95% CI 0.92–1.24; P =0.365). In terms of risk of ARDS (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24–0.78; P =0.005), duration of intensive care unit (MD -1.04; 95%CI-1.36 to −0.73; P < 0.00001), and oxygenation (MD 40.30; 95%CI 0.94 to 79.65; P = 0.045), higher PEEP was superior to lower PEEP. Besides, the pooled analysis showed no significant differences between groups both in the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD 0.00; 95%CI-0.13 to 0.13; P = 0.996) and hospital stay (MD -0.66; 95%CI-1.94 to 0.61; P = 0.309). More importantly, lower PEEP did not increase the risk of pneumonia, atelectasis, barotrauma, hypoxemia, or hypotension among patients compared with higher PEEP. The TSA analysis showed that the results of all-cause mortality and 28-day mortality might be false-negative results. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a lower PEEP ventilation strategy was non-inferior to a higher PEEP ventilation strategy in ICU patients without ARDS, with no increased risk of all-cause mortality and 28-day mortality. Further high-quality RCTs should be performed to confirm these findings. Elsevier Inc. 2021-10 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8253690/ /pubmed/34274832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.06.015 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Shao, Shuai
Kang, Hanyujie
Qian, Zhenbei
Wang, Yingquan
Tong, Zhaohui
Effect of different levels of PEEP on mortality in ICU patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title Effect of different levels of PEEP on mortality in ICU patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_full Effect of different levels of PEEP on mortality in ICU patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_fullStr Effect of different levels of PEEP on mortality in ICU patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different levels of PEEP on mortality in ICU patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_short Effect of different levels of PEEP on mortality in ICU patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_sort effect of different levels of peep on mortality in icu patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34274832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.06.015
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoshuai effectofdifferentlevelsofpeeponmortalityinicupatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT kanghanyujie effectofdifferentlevelsofpeeponmortalityinicupatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT qianzhenbei effectofdifferentlevelsofpeeponmortalityinicupatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT wangyingquan effectofdifferentlevelsofpeeponmortalityinicupatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT tongzhaohui effectofdifferentlevelsofpeeponmortalityinicupatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromesystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis