Cargando…

Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children

Choroidal thickness is associated with many ocular conditions, interchangeability among different generations of optical coherence tomography is therefore important for both research purpose and clinical application. Hence, we compared choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain optical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Chun On, Zhang, Xiujuan, Yuan, Nan, Tang, Shumin, Chen, Li Jia, Cheung, Carol Y., Yam, Jason C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92980-9
_version_ 1783717586027937792
author Lee, Chun On
Zhang, Xiujuan
Yuan, Nan
Tang, Shumin
Chen, Li Jia
Cheung, Carol Y.
Yam, Jason C.
author_facet Lee, Chun On
Zhang, Xiujuan
Yuan, Nan
Tang, Shumin
Chen, Li Jia
Cheung, Carol Y.
Yam, Jason C.
author_sort Lee, Chun On
collection PubMed
description Choroidal thickness is associated with many ocular conditions, interchangeability among different generations of optical coherence tomography is therefore important for both research purpose and clinical application. Hence, we compared choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in healthy paediatric eyes. A total of 114 children from the population-based Hong Kong Children Eye Study with mean age of 7.38 ± 0.82 years were included. Choroidal thickness of the right eye was measured by both devices. The central foveal choroidal thickness (CFCT) measured by SD-OCT and SS-OCT was 273.24 ± 54.29 μm and 251.84 ± 47.12 μm respectively. Inter-device correlation coefficient was 0.840 (95% CI 0.616–0.918). However, choroidal thickness obtained by SD-OCT was significantly thicker than that measured by SS-OCT with a mean difference of 21.40 ± 33.13 μm (P < 0.001). Bland–Altman limit of agreement on the relative difference scale for SD-OCT/SS-OCT was 86.33 μm. Validated conversion equation for translating SD-OCT CFCT measurement into SS-OCT was SS-OCT = 35.261 + 0.810 × SD-OCT. In conclusion, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) shows an acceptable agreement between SD-OCT and SS-OCT, however, there was a significant inter-device difference of choroidal thickness measurements in normal children eyes. Therefore, the measurements are not interchangeable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8253773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82537732021-07-06 Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children Lee, Chun On Zhang, Xiujuan Yuan, Nan Tang, Shumin Chen, Li Jia Cheung, Carol Y. Yam, Jason C. Sci Rep Article Choroidal thickness is associated with many ocular conditions, interchangeability among different generations of optical coherence tomography is therefore important for both research purpose and clinical application. Hence, we compared choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in healthy paediatric eyes. A total of 114 children from the population-based Hong Kong Children Eye Study with mean age of 7.38 ± 0.82 years were included. Choroidal thickness of the right eye was measured by both devices. The central foveal choroidal thickness (CFCT) measured by SD-OCT and SS-OCT was 273.24 ± 54.29 μm and 251.84 ± 47.12 μm respectively. Inter-device correlation coefficient was 0.840 (95% CI 0.616–0.918). However, choroidal thickness obtained by SD-OCT was significantly thicker than that measured by SS-OCT with a mean difference of 21.40 ± 33.13 μm (P < 0.001). Bland–Altman limit of agreement on the relative difference scale for SD-OCT/SS-OCT was 86.33 μm. Validated conversion equation for translating SD-OCT CFCT measurement into SS-OCT was SS-OCT = 35.261 + 0.810 × SD-OCT. In conclusion, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) shows an acceptable agreement between SD-OCT and SS-OCT, however, there was a significant inter-device difference of choroidal thickness measurements in normal children eyes. Therefore, the measurements are not interchangeable. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8253773/ /pubmed/34215790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92980-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Chun On
Zhang, Xiujuan
Yuan, Nan
Tang, Shumin
Chen, Li Jia
Cheung, Carol Y.
Yam, Jason C.
Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children
title Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children
title_full Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children
title_fullStr Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children
title_short Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children
title_sort comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92980-9
work_keys_str_mv AT leechunon comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsbetweenspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyinchildren
AT zhangxiujuan comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsbetweenspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyinchildren
AT yuannan comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsbetweenspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyinchildren
AT tangshumin comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsbetweenspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyinchildren
AT chenlijia comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsbetweenspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyinchildren
AT cheungcaroly comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsbetweenspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyinchildren
AT yamjasonc comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsbetweenspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyandsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyinchildren