Cargando…
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study
BACKGROUND: Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. In the TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in heavily pre-treated patients. This unplanned, explorator...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34175675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100200 |
_version_ | 1783717627289403392 |
---|---|
author | Tabernero, J. Shitara, K. Zaanan, A. Doi, T. Lorenzen, S. Van Cutsem, E. Fornaro, L. Catenacci, D.V.T. Fougeray, R. Moreno, S.R. Azcue, P. Arkenau, H.-T. Alsina, M. Ilson, D.H. |
author_facet | Tabernero, J. Shitara, K. Zaanan, A. Doi, T. Lorenzen, S. Van Cutsem, E. Fornaro, L. Catenacci, D.V.T. Fougeray, R. Moreno, S.R. Azcue, P. Arkenau, H.-T. Alsina, M. Ilson, D.H. |
author_sort | Tabernero, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. In the TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in heavily pre-treated patients. This unplanned, exploratory subgroup analysis of the TAGS study aimed to clarify outcomes when FTD/TPI was used as third-line (3L) treatment and fourth- or later-line (4L+) treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into a 3L group (126 and 64 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively) and 4L+ group (211 and 106 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively). Endpoints included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) deterioration to ≥2, and safety. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between FTD/TPI and placebo for 3L and 4L+ treatment. Median OS (mOS) for FTD/TPI versus placebo was: 6.8 versus 3.2 months {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.68 (0.47-0.97), P = 0.0318} in the 3L group; and 5.2 versus 3.7 months [0.73 (0.55-0.95), P = 0.0192] in the 4L+ group. Median PFS for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 3.1 versus 1.9 months [0.54 (0.38-0.77), P = 0.0004] in the 3L group; and 1.9 versus 1.8 months [0.57 (0.44-0.74), P < 0.0001] in the 4L+ group. Time to deterioration of ECOG PS to ≥2 for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 4.8 versus 2.0 months [HR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.42-0.86), P = 0.0049] in the 3L group; and 4.0 versus 2.5 months [0.75 (0.57-0.98), P = 0.0329] in the 4L+ group. The safety of FTD/TPI was consistent in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in patients with GC/EGJ in third and later lines with a survival benefit that seems slightly superior in 3L treatment. When FTD/TPI is taken in 3L as recommended in the international guidelines, physicians can expect to provide patients with an mOS of 6.8 months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8253956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82539562021-07-12 Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study Tabernero, J. Shitara, K. Zaanan, A. Doi, T. Lorenzen, S. Van Cutsem, E. Fornaro, L. Catenacci, D.V.T. Fougeray, R. Moreno, S.R. Azcue, P. Arkenau, H.-T. Alsina, M. Ilson, D.H. ESMO Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. In the TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in heavily pre-treated patients. This unplanned, exploratory subgroup analysis of the TAGS study aimed to clarify outcomes when FTD/TPI was used as third-line (3L) treatment and fourth- or later-line (4L+) treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into a 3L group (126 and 64 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively) and 4L+ group (211 and 106 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively). Endpoints included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) deterioration to ≥2, and safety. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between FTD/TPI and placebo for 3L and 4L+ treatment. Median OS (mOS) for FTD/TPI versus placebo was: 6.8 versus 3.2 months {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.68 (0.47-0.97), P = 0.0318} in the 3L group; and 5.2 versus 3.7 months [0.73 (0.55-0.95), P = 0.0192] in the 4L+ group. Median PFS for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 3.1 versus 1.9 months [0.54 (0.38-0.77), P = 0.0004] in the 3L group; and 1.9 versus 1.8 months [0.57 (0.44-0.74), P < 0.0001] in the 4L+ group. Time to deterioration of ECOG PS to ≥2 for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 4.8 versus 2.0 months [HR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.42-0.86), P = 0.0049] in the 3L group; and 4.0 versus 2.5 months [0.75 (0.57-0.98), P = 0.0329] in the 4L+ group. The safety of FTD/TPI was consistent in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in patients with GC/EGJ in third and later lines with a survival benefit that seems slightly superior in 3L treatment. When FTD/TPI is taken in 3L as recommended in the international guidelines, physicians can expect to provide patients with an mOS of 6.8 months. Elsevier 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8253956/ /pubmed/34175675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100200 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tabernero, J. Shitara, K. Zaanan, A. Doi, T. Lorenzen, S. Van Cutsem, E. Fornaro, L. Catenacci, D.V.T. Fougeray, R. Moreno, S.R. Azcue, P. Arkenau, H.-T. Alsina, M. Ilson, D.H. Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study |
title | Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study |
title_full | Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study |
title_fullStr | Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study |
title_full_unstemmed | Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study |
title_short | Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study |
title_sort | trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the tags study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34175675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taberneroj trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT shitarak trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT zaanana trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT doit trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT lorenzens trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT vancutseme trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT fornarol trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT catenaccidvt trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT fougerayr trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT morenosr trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT azcuep trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT arkenauht trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT alsinam trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy AT ilsondh trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy |