Cargando…

Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study

BACKGROUND: Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. In the TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in heavily pre-treated patients. This unplanned, explorator...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabernero, J., Shitara, K., Zaanan, A., Doi, T., Lorenzen, S., Van Cutsem, E., Fornaro, L., Catenacci, D.V.T., Fougeray, R., Moreno, S.R., Azcue, P., Arkenau, H.-T., Alsina, M., Ilson, D.H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34175675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100200
_version_ 1783717627289403392
author Tabernero, J.
Shitara, K.
Zaanan, A.
Doi, T.
Lorenzen, S.
Van Cutsem, E.
Fornaro, L.
Catenacci, D.V.T.
Fougeray, R.
Moreno, S.R.
Azcue, P.
Arkenau, H.-T.
Alsina, M.
Ilson, D.H.
author_facet Tabernero, J.
Shitara, K.
Zaanan, A.
Doi, T.
Lorenzen, S.
Van Cutsem, E.
Fornaro, L.
Catenacci, D.V.T.
Fougeray, R.
Moreno, S.R.
Azcue, P.
Arkenau, H.-T.
Alsina, M.
Ilson, D.H.
author_sort Tabernero, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. In the TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in heavily pre-treated patients. This unplanned, exploratory subgroup analysis of the TAGS study aimed to clarify outcomes when FTD/TPI was used as third-line (3L) treatment and fourth- or later-line (4L+) treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into a 3L group (126 and 64 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively) and 4L+ group (211 and 106 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively). Endpoints included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) deterioration to ≥2, and safety. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between FTD/TPI and placebo for 3L and 4L+ treatment. Median OS (mOS) for FTD/TPI versus placebo was: 6.8 versus 3.2 months {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.68 (0.47-0.97), P = 0.0318} in the 3L group; and 5.2 versus 3.7 months [0.73 (0.55-0.95), P = 0.0192] in the 4L+ group. Median PFS for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 3.1 versus 1.9 months [0.54 (0.38-0.77), P = 0.0004] in the 3L group; and 1.9 versus 1.8 months [0.57 (0.44-0.74), P < 0.0001] in the 4L+ group. Time to deterioration of ECOG PS to ≥2 for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 4.8 versus 2.0 months [HR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.42-0.86), P = 0.0049] in the 3L group; and 4.0 versus 2.5 months [0.75 (0.57-0.98), P = 0.0329] in the 4L+ group. The safety of FTD/TPI was consistent in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in patients with GC/EGJ in third and later lines with a survival benefit that seems slightly superior in 3L treatment. When FTD/TPI is taken in 3L as recommended in the international guidelines, physicians can expect to provide patients with an mOS of 6.8 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8253956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82539562021-07-12 Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study Tabernero, J. Shitara, K. Zaanan, A. Doi, T. Lorenzen, S. Van Cutsem, E. Fornaro, L. Catenacci, D.V.T. Fougeray, R. Moreno, S.R. Azcue, P. Arkenau, H.-T. Alsina, M. Ilson, D.H. ESMO Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. In the TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in heavily pre-treated patients. This unplanned, exploratory subgroup analysis of the TAGS study aimed to clarify outcomes when FTD/TPI was used as third-line (3L) treatment and fourth- or later-line (4L+) treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into a 3L group (126 and 64 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively) and 4L+ group (211 and 106 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively). Endpoints included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) deterioration to ≥2, and safety. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between FTD/TPI and placebo for 3L and 4L+ treatment. Median OS (mOS) for FTD/TPI versus placebo was: 6.8 versus 3.2 months {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.68 (0.47-0.97), P = 0.0318} in the 3L group; and 5.2 versus 3.7 months [0.73 (0.55-0.95), P = 0.0192] in the 4L+ group. Median PFS for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 3.1 versus 1.9 months [0.54 (0.38-0.77), P = 0.0004] in the 3L group; and 1.9 versus 1.8 months [0.57 (0.44-0.74), P < 0.0001] in the 4L+ group. Time to deterioration of ECOG PS to ≥2 for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 4.8 versus 2.0 months [HR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.42-0.86), P = 0.0049] in the 3L group; and 4.0 versus 2.5 months [0.75 (0.57-0.98), P = 0.0329] in the 4L+ group. The safety of FTD/TPI was consistent in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in patients with GC/EGJ in third and later lines with a survival benefit that seems slightly superior in 3L treatment. When FTD/TPI is taken in 3L as recommended in the international guidelines, physicians can expect to provide patients with an mOS of 6.8 months. Elsevier 2021-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8253956/ /pubmed/34175675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100200 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Tabernero, J.
Shitara, K.
Zaanan, A.
Doi, T.
Lorenzen, S.
Van Cutsem, E.
Fornaro, L.
Catenacci, D.V.T.
Fougeray, R.
Moreno, S.R.
Azcue, P.
Arkenau, H.-T.
Alsina, M.
Ilson, D.H.
Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study
title Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study
title_full Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study
title_fullStr Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study
title_full_unstemmed Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study
title_short Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study
title_sort trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the tags study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34175675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100200
work_keys_str_mv AT taberneroj trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT shitarak trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT zaanana trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT doit trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT lorenzens trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT vancutseme trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT fornarol trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT catenaccidvt trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT fougerayr trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT morenosr trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT azcuep trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT arkenauht trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT alsinam trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy
AT ilsondh trifluridinetipiracilversusplaceboforthirdorlaterlinesoftreatmentinmetastaticgastriccanceranexploratorysubgroupanalysisfromthetagsstudy