Cargando…

Dual Bronchodilator Therapy as First-Line Treatment in Maintenance-Naïve Patients with Symptomatic COPD: A Pre-Specified Analysis of the EMAX Trial

INTRODUCTION: Limited prospective evidence is available to guide selection of first-line maintenance therapy in patients with COPD. This pre-specified analysis of the EMAX trial explored the efficacy and safety of dual- versus mono-bronchodilator therapy in maintenance-naïve and maintenance-treated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bjermer, Leif, Boucot, Isabelle H, Maltais, François, Kerwin, Edward M, Naya, Ian P, Tombs, Lee, Jones, Paul W, Compton, Chris, Lipson, David A, Vogelmeier, Claus F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34234425
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S291751
_version_ 1783717657751584768
author Bjermer, Leif
Boucot, Isabelle H
Maltais, François
Kerwin, Edward M
Naya, Ian P
Tombs, Lee
Jones, Paul W
Compton, Chris
Lipson, David A
Vogelmeier, Claus F
author_facet Bjermer, Leif
Boucot, Isabelle H
Maltais, François
Kerwin, Edward M
Naya, Ian P
Tombs, Lee
Jones, Paul W
Compton, Chris
Lipson, David A
Vogelmeier, Claus F
author_sort Bjermer, Leif
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Limited prospective evidence is available to guide selection of first-line maintenance therapy in patients with COPD. This pre-specified analysis of the EMAX trial explored the efficacy and safety of dual- versus mono-bronchodilator therapy in maintenance-naïve and maintenance-treated patients. METHODS: The 24-week EMAX trial evaluated lung function, symptoms (including rescue medication use), exacerbations, and safety with umeclidinium/vilanterol, umeclidinium, and salmeterol in symptomatic patients at low exacerbation risk who were not receiving inhaled corticosteroids. Maintenance-naïve and maintenance-treated subgroups were defined by maintenance bronchodilator use 30 days before screening. RESULTS: The analysis included 749 (31%) maintenance-naïve and 1676 (69%) maintenance-treated patients. For both subgroups, improvements from baseline in trough FEV(1) at Week 24 (primary endpoint) were greater with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium (mean difference [95% CI]; maintenance-naïve: 44 mL [1, 87]; maintenance-treated: 77 mL [50, 104]), and salmeterol (maintenance-naïve: 128 mL [85, 171]; maintenance-treated: 145 mL [118, 172]), and in rescue medication inhalations/day over 24 weeks versus umeclidinium (maintenance-naïve: −0.44 [−0.73, −0.16]; maintenance-treated: −0.28 [−0.45, −0.12]) and salmeterol (maintenance-naïve: −0.37 [−0.66, −0.09]; maintenance-treated: −0.25 [−0.41, −0.08]). In maintenance-naïve patients, umeclidinium/vilanterol numerically improved scores at Week 24 for Transition Dyspnea Index versus umeclidinium (0.37 [−0.21, 0.96]) and versus salmeterol (0.47 [−0.10, 1.05]) and Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms–COPD versus umeclidinium (−0.26 [−1.04, 0.53]) and versus salmeterol (−0.58 [−1.36, 0.20]), with similar improvements seen in maintenance-treated patients. All treatments were well tolerated across both subgroups. CONCLUSION: Similar to maintenance-treated patients, maintenance-naïve patients receiving umeclidinium/vilanterol showed greater improvements in lung function and symptoms compared with patients receiving umeclidinium or salmeterol. These findings provide support for the consideration of dual bronchodilator treatment in symptomatic maintenance-naïve patients with COPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8254100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82541002021-07-06 Dual Bronchodilator Therapy as First-Line Treatment in Maintenance-Naïve Patients with Symptomatic COPD: A Pre-Specified Analysis of the EMAX Trial Bjermer, Leif Boucot, Isabelle H Maltais, François Kerwin, Edward M Naya, Ian P Tombs, Lee Jones, Paul W Compton, Chris Lipson, David A Vogelmeier, Claus F Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Limited prospective evidence is available to guide selection of first-line maintenance therapy in patients with COPD. This pre-specified analysis of the EMAX trial explored the efficacy and safety of dual- versus mono-bronchodilator therapy in maintenance-naïve and maintenance-treated patients. METHODS: The 24-week EMAX trial evaluated lung function, symptoms (including rescue medication use), exacerbations, and safety with umeclidinium/vilanterol, umeclidinium, and salmeterol in symptomatic patients at low exacerbation risk who were not receiving inhaled corticosteroids. Maintenance-naïve and maintenance-treated subgroups were defined by maintenance bronchodilator use 30 days before screening. RESULTS: The analysis included 749 (31%) maintenance-naïve and 1676 (69%) maintenance-treated patients. For both subgroups, improvements from baseline in trough FEV(1) at Week 24 (primary endpoint) were greater with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium (mean difference [95% CI]; maintenance-naïve: 44 mL [1, 87]; maintenance-treated: 77 mL [50, 104]), and salmeterol (maintenance-naïve: 128 mL [85, 171]; maintenance-treated: 145 mL [118, 172]), and in rescue medication inhalations/day over 24 weeks versus umeclidinium (maintenance-naïve: −0.44 [−0.73, −0.16]; maintenance-treated: −0.28 [−0.45, −0.12]) and salmeterol (maintenance-naïve: −0.37 [−0.66, −0.09]; maintenance-treated: −0.25 [−0.41, −0.08]). In maintenance-naïve patients, umeclidinium/vilanterol numerically improved scores at Week 24 for Transition Dyspnea Index versus umeclidinium (0.37 [−0.21, 0.96]) and versus salmeterol (0.47 [−0.10, 1.05]) and Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms–COPD versus umeclidinium (−0.26 [−1.04, 0.53]) and versus salmeterol (−0.58 [−1.36, 0.20]), with similar improvements seen in maintenance-treated patients. All treatments were well tolerated across both subgroups. CONCLUSION: Similar to maintenance-treated patients, maintenance-naïve patients receiving umeclidinium/vilanterol showed greater improvements in lung function and symptoms compared with patients receiving umeclidinium or salmeterol. These findings provide support for the consideration of dual bronchodilator treatment in symptomatic maintenance-naïve patients with COPD. Dove 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8254100/ /pubmed/34234425 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S291751 Text en © 2021 Bjermer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bjermer, Leif
Boucot, Isabelle H
Maltais, François
Kerwin, Edward M
Naya, Ian P
Tombs, Lee
Jones, Paul W
Compton, Chris
Lipson, David A
Vogelmeier, Claus F
Dual Bronchodilator Therapy as First-Line Treatment in Maintenance-Naïve Patients with Symptomatic COPD: A Pre-Specified Analysis of the EMAX Trial
title Dual Bronchodilator Therapy as First-Line Treatment in Maintenance-Naïve Patients with Symptomatic COPD: A Pre-Specified Analysis of the EMAX Trial
title_full Dual Bronchodilator Therapy as First-Line Treatment in Maintenance-Naïve Patients with Symptomatic COPD: A Pre-Specified Analysis of the EMAX Trial
title_fullStr Dual Bronchodilator Therapy as First-Line Treatment in Maintenance-Naïve Patients with Symptomatic COPD: A Pre-Specified Analysis of the EMAX Trial
title_full_unstemmed Dual Bronchodilator Therapy as First-Line Treatment in Maintenance-Naïve Patients with Symptomatic COPD: A Pre-Specified Analysis of the EMAX Trial
title_short Dual Bronchodilator Therapy as First-Line Treatment in Maintenance-Naïve Patients with Symptomatic COPD: A Pre-Specified Analysis of the EMAX Trial
title_sort dual bronchodilator therapy as first-line treatment in maintenance-naïve patients with symptomatic copd: a pre-specified analysis of the emax trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34234425
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S291751
work_keys_str_mv AT bjermerleif dualbronchodilatortherapyasfirstlinetreatmentinmaintenancenaivepatientswithsymptomaticcopdaprespecifiedanalysisoftheemaxtrial
AT boucotisabelleh dualbronchodilatortherapyasfirstlinetreatmentinmaintenancenaivepatientswithsymptomaticcopdaprespecifiedanalysisoftheemaxtrial
AT maltaisfrancois dualbronchodilatortherapyasfirstlinetreatmentinmaintenancenaivepatientswithsymptomaticcopdaprespecifiedanalysisoftheemaxtrial
AT kerwinedwardm dualbronchodilatortherapyasfirstlinetreatmentinmaintenancenaivepatientswithsymptomaticcopdaprespecifiedanalysisoftheemaxtrial
AT nayaianp dualbronchodilatortherapyasfirstlinetreatmentinmaintenancenaivepatientswithsymptomaticcopdaprespecifiedanalysisoftheemaxtrial
AT tombslee dualbronchodilatortherapyasfirstlinetreatmentinmaintenancenaivepatientswithsymptomaticcopdaprespecifiedanalysisoftheemaxtrial
AT jonespaulw dualbronchodilatortherapyasfirstlinetreatmentinmaintenancenaivepatientswithsymptomaticcopdaprespecifiedanalysisoftheemaxtrial
AT comptonchris dualbronchodilatortherapyasfirstlinetreatmentinmaintenancenaivepatientswithsymptomaticcopdaprespecifiedanalysisoftheemaxtrial
AT lipsondavida dualbronchodilatortherapyasfirstlinetreatmentinmaintenancenaivepatientswithsymptomaticcopdaprespecifiedanalysisoftheemaxtrial
AT vogelmeierclausf dualbronchodilatortherapyasfirstlinetreatmentinmaintenancenaivepatientswithsymptomaticcopdaprespecifiedanalysisoftheemaxtrial