Cargando…

Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening

Cervical cancer screening delivery remains suboptimal. Understanding the multiple influences on use of screening is important to designing interventions. We describe the influence of patient, primary care provider (PCP), and clinic characteristics on whether a woman is up-to-date with cervical scree...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haas, Jennifer S., Vogeli, Christine, Yu, Liyang, Atlas, Steven J., Skinner, Celette Sugg, Harris, Kimberly A., Feldman, Sarah, Tiro, Jasmin A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101468
_version_ 1783717662841372672
author Haas, Jennifer S.
Vogeli, Christine
Yu, Liyang
Atlas, Steven J.
Skinner, Celette Sugg
Harris, Kimberly A.
Feldman, Sarah
Tiro, Jasmin A.
author_facet Haas, Jennifer S.
Vogeli, Christine
Yu, Liyang
Atlas, Steven J.
Skinner, Celette Sugg
Harris, Kimberly A.
Feldman, Sarah
Tiro, Jasmin A.
author_sort Haas, Jennifer S.
collection PubMed
description Cervical cancer screening delivery remains suboptimal. Understanding the multiple influences on use of screening is important to designing interventions. We describe the influence of patient, primary care provider (PCP), and clinic characteristics on whether a woman is up-to-date with cervical screening as of December 2016. PCPs (n = 194) and their female screen-eligible patients age 21–65 years (n = 32,115) were included in this cross-sectional analysis of patients from two primary care networks linked to a contemporaneous PCP survey. Principal independent variables for patients included: age, race, insurance, continuity of care; for PCP included: overall satisfaction with the practice of medicine, gender, hours worked per week, financial support for achieving clinical targets; and for clinic included: routine receipt of data on preventive care performance and language translation resources. Overall, 66.6% of women were up-to-date. Women were less likely to be up-to-date with cervical cancer screening if they were younger and were more likely to be screened if they were Black, Hispanic or Asian vs. White. Women with greater continuity of primary care or with a female PCP were more likely to be up-to-date (1.52; 1.33–1.75); those who received care in a clinic that was less prepared to manage language translation were less likely to be up-to-date (0.78; 0.65–0.95). Patient, provider, and clinic factors all influence use of cervical cancer screening. Systems interventions like improving continuity of care, promoting translation services, or enhanced efforts to track screening among patients of male PCPs may improve delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8254123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82541232021-07-12 Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening Haas, Jennifer S. Vogeli, Christine Yu, Liyang Atlas, Steven J. Skinner, Celette Sugg Harris, Kimberly A. Feldman, Sarah Tiro, Jasmin A. Prev Med Rep Short Communication Cervical cancer screening delivery remains suboptimal. Understanding the multiple influences on use of screening is important to designing interventions. We describe the influence of patient, primary care provider (PCP), and clinic characteristics on whether a woman is up-to-date with cervical screening as of December 2016. PCPs (n = 194) and their female screen-eligible patients age 21–65 years (n = 32,115) were included in this cross-sectional analysis of patients from two primary care networks linked to a contemporaneous PCP survey. Principal independent variables for patients included: age, race, insurance, continuity of care; for PCP included: overall satisfaction with the practice of medicine, gender, hours worked per week, financial support for achieving clinical targets; and for clinic included: routine receipt of data on preventive care performance and language translation resources. Overall, 66.6% of women were up-to-date. Women were less likely to be up-to-date with cervical cancer screening if they were younger and were more likely to be screened if they were Black, Hispanic or Asian vs. White. Women with greater continuity of primary care or with a female PCP were more likely to be up-to-date (1.52; 1.33–1.75); those who received care in a clinic that was less prepared to manage language translation were less likely to be up-to-date (0.78; 0.65–0.95). Patient, provider, and clinic factors all influence use of cervical cancer screening. Systems interventions like improving continuity of care, promoting translation services, or enhanced efforts to track screening among patients of male PCPs may improve delivery. 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8254123/ /pubmed/34258177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101468 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
Haas, Jennifer S.
Vogeli, Christine
Yu, Liyang
Atlas, Steven J.
Skinner, Celette Sugg
Harris, Kimberly A.
Feldman, Sarah
Tiro, Jasmin A.
Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening
title Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening
title_full Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening
title_fullStr Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening
title_short Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening
title_sort patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101468
work_keys_str_mv AT haasjennifers patientproviderandclinicfactorsassociatedwiththeuseofcervicalcancerscreening
AT vogelichristine patientproviderandclinicfactorsassociatedwiththeuseofcervicalcancerscreening
AT yuliyang patientproviderandclinicfactorsassociatedwiththeuseofcervicalcancerscreening
AT atlasstevenj patientproviderandclinicfactorsassociatedwiththeuseofcervicalcancerscreening
AT skinnercelettesugg patientproviderandclinicfactorsassociatedwiththeuseofcervicalcancerscreening
AT harriskimberlya patientproviderandclinicfactorsassociatedwiththeuseofcervicalcancerscreening
AT feldmansarah patientproviderandclinicfactorsassociatedwiththeuseofcervicalcancerscreening
AT tirojasmina patientproviderandclinicfactorsassociatedwiththeuseofcervicalcancerscreening