Cargando…

Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?

PURPOSE: Etiology could not be determined in approximately 50% of recurrent pregnancy loss cases, and it was named unexpected recurrent pregnancy loss(URPL). A body shape index(ABSI), body roundness index(BRI), and waist‐to‐hip ratio(WtHR) are new indexes that are superior to BMI in showing body fat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiremitli, Tunay, Kiremitli, Sevil, Ulug, Pasa, Dinc, Kemal, Uzel, Kemine, Arslan, Yusuf Kemal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12388
_version_ 1783717672086667264
author Kiremitli, Tunay
Kiremitli, Sevil
Ulug, Pasa
Dinc, Kemal
Uzel, Kemine
Arslan, Yusuf Kemal
author_facet Kiremitli, Tunay
Kiremitli, Sevil
Ulug, Pasa
Dinc, Kemal
Uzel, Kemine
Arslan, Yusuf Kemal
author_sort Kiremitli, Tunay
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Etiology could not be determined in approximately 50% of recurrent pregnancy loss cases, and it was named unexpected recurrent pregnancy loss(URPL). A body shape index(ABSI), body roundness index(BRI), and waist‐to‐hip ratio(WtHR) are new indexes that are superior to BMI in showing body fat distribution. We aimed to investigate the potency of ABSI, BRI, and WtHR in URPL, their superiority to BMI, and their suitability for clinical use. METHODS: One hundred and thirty‐eight patients between the ages of 20‐40 who applied to our hospital for URPL between January 2016 and December 31, 2020 were included in our study. Weight, height, waist circumference, and hip circumference were measured, and indexes were calculated. Differences between the URPL and control groups were calculated using the IBM SPSS program. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the two groups for BRI, ABSI, and WtHR values, while there was no significant difference in BMI. BRI(4.4 ± 1.7vs3.9 ± 1.5), ABSI(0.08 ± 0.005 vs 0.078 ± 0.004), and WtHR(0.84 ± 0.06vs0.82 ± 0.05) values were higher in the URPL group. ROC analysis showed us that BRI, ABSI, and WtHR have a diagnostic value for URPL(P < .05). When indexes were above the cutoff values, RPL risk increased 3.59 times in ABSI, 2.26 times in BRI, and 2.9 times in WtHR(P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between obesity and URPL can be explained more clearly by using effective indexes that show body fat distribution rather than BMI. Ethics committee approval was obtained from Erzincan Binali Yildirim University in 14.01.2021. Clinical Research Ethics Committee no: 01/01.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8254164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82541642021-07-13 Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss? Kiremitli, Tunay Kiremitli, Sevil Ulug, Pasa Dinc, Kemal Uzel, Kemine Arslan, Yusuf Kemal Reprod Med Biol Original Articles PURPOSE: Etiology could not be determined in approximately 50% of recurrent pregnancy loss cases, and it was named unexpected recurrent pregnancy loss(URPL). A body shape index(ABSI), body roundness index(BRI), and waist‐to‐hip ratio(WtHR) are new indexes that are superior to BMI in showing body fat distribution. We aimed to investigate the potency of ABSI, BRI, and WtHR in URPL, their superiority to BMI, and their suitability for clinical use. METHODS: One hundred and thirty‐eight patients between the ages of 20‐40 who applied to our hospital for URPL between January 2016 and December 31, 2020 were included in our study. Weight, height, waist circumference, and hip circumference were measured, and indexes were calculated. Differences between the URPL and control groups were calculated using the IBM SPSS program. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the two groups for BRI, ABSI, and WtHR values, while there was no significant difference in BMI. BRI(4.4 ± 1.7vs3.9 ± 1.5), ABSI(0.08 ± 0.005 vs 0.078 ± 0.004), and WtHR(0.84 ± 0.06vs0.82 ± 0.05) values were higher in the URPL group. ROC analysis showed us that BRI, ABSI, and WtHR have a diagnostic value for URPL(P < .05). When indexes were above the cutoff values, RPL risk increased 3.59 times in ABSI, 2.26 times in BRI, and 2.9 times in WtHR(P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between obesity and URPL can be explained more clearly by using effective indexes that show body fat distribution rather than BMI. Ethics committee approval was obtained from Erzincan Binali Yildirim University in 14.01.2021. Clinical Research Ethics Committee no: 01/01. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8254164/ /pubmed/34262401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12388 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kiremitli, Tunay
Kiremitli, Sevil
Ulug, Pasa
Dinc, Kemal
Uzel, Kemine
Arslan, Yusuf Kemal
Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?
title Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?
title_full Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?
title_fullStr Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?
title_full_unstemmed Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?
title_short Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?
title_sort are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than bmi to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12388
work_keys_str_mv AT kiremitlitunay arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT kiremitlisevil arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT ulugpasa arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT dinckemal arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT uzelkemine arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT arslanyusufkemal arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss