Cargando…
Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?
PURPOSE: Etiology could not be determined in approximately 50% of recurrent pregnancy loss cases, and it was named unexpected recurrent pregnancy loss(URPL). A body shape index(ABSI), body roundness index(BRI), and waist‐to‐hip ratio(WtHR) are new indexes that are superior to BMI in showing body fat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12388 |
_version_ | 1783717672086667264 |
---|---|
author | Kiremitli, Tunay Kiremitli, Sevil Ulug, Pasa Dinc, Kemal Uzel, Kemine Arslan, Yusuf Kemal |
author_facet | Kiremitli, Tunay Kiremitli, Sevil Ulug, Pasa Dinc, Kemal Uzel, Kemine Arslan, Yusuf Kemal |
author_sort | Kiremitli, Tunay |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Etiology could not be determined in approximately 50% of recurrent pregnancy loss cases, and it was named unexpected recurrent pregnancy loss(URPL). A body shape index(ABSI), body roundness index(BRI), and waist‐to‐hip ratio(WtHR) are new indexes that are superior to BMI in showing body fat distribution. We aimed to investigate the potency of ABSI, BRI, and WtHR in URPL, their superiority to BMI, and their suitability for clinical use. METHODS: One hundred and thirty‐eight patients between the ages of 20‐40 who applied to our hospital for URPL between January 2016 and December 31, 2020 were included in our study. Weight, height, waist circumference, and hip circumference were measured, and indexes were calculated. Differences between the URPL and control groups were calculated using the IBM SPSS program. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the two groups for BRI, ABSI, and WtHR values, while there was no significant difference in BMI. BRI(4.4 ± 1.7vs3.9 ± 1.5), ABSI(0.08 ± 0.005 vs 0.078 ± 0.004), and WtHR(0.84 ± 0.06vs0.82 ± 0.05) values were higher in the URPL group. ROC analysis showed us that BRI, ABSI, and WtHR have a diagnostic value for URPL(P < .05). When indexes were above the cutoff values, RPL risk increased 3.59 times in ABSI, 2.26 times in BRI, and 2.9 times in WtHR(P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between obesity and URPL can be explained more clearly by using effective indexes that show body fat distribution rather than BMI. Ethics committee approval was obtained from Erzincan Binali Yildirim University in 14.01.2021. Clinical Research Ethics Committee no: 01/01. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8254164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82541642021-07-13 Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss? Kiremitli, Tunay Kiremitli, Sevil Ulug, Pasa Dinc, Kemal Uzel, Kemine Arslan, Yusuf Kemal Reprod Med Biol Original Articles PURPOSE: Etiology could not be determined in approximately 50% of recurrent pregnancy loss cases, and it was named unexpected recurrent pregnancy loss(URPL). A body shape index(ABSI), body roundness index(BRI), and waist‐to‐hip ratio(WtHR) are new indexes that are superior to BMI in showing body fat distribution. We aimed to investigate the potency of ABSI, BRI, and WtHR in URPL, their superiority to BMI, and their suitability for clinical use. METHODS: One hundred and thirty‐eight patients between the ages of 20‐40 who applied to our hospital for URPL between January 2016 and December 31, 2020 were included in our study. Weight, height, waist circumference, and hip circumference were measured, and indexes were calculated. Differences between the URPL and control groups were calculated using the IBM SPSS program. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the two groups for BRI, ABSI, and WtHR values, while there was no significant difference in BMI. BRI(4.4 ± 1.7vs3.9 ± 1.5), ABSI(0.08 ± 0.005 vs 0.078 ± 0.004), and WtHR(0.84 ± 0.06vs0.82 ± 0.05) values were higher in the URPL group. ROC analysis showed us that BRI, ABSI, and WtHR have a diagnostic value for URPL(P < .05). When indexes were above the cutoff values, RPL risk increased 3.59 times in ABSI, 2.26 times in BRI, and 2.9 times in WtHR(P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between obesity and URPL can be explained more clearly by using effective indexes that show body fat distribution rather than BMI. Ethics committee approval was obtained from Erzincan Binali Yildirim University in 14.01.2021. Clinical Research Ethics Committee no: 01/01. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8254164/ /pubmed/34262401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12388 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kiremitli, Tunay Kiremitli, Sevil Ulug, Pasa Dinc, Kemal Uzel, Kemine Arslan, Yusuf Kemal Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss? |
title | Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss? |
title_full | Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss? |
title_fullStr | Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss? |
title_short | Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss? |
title_sort | are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist‐to‐hip ratio better than bmi to predict recurrent pregnancy loss? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiremitlitunay arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss AT kiremitlisevil arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss AT ulugpasa arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss AT dinckemal arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss AT uzelkemine arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss AT arslanyusufkemal arethebodyshapeindexthebodyroundnessindexandwaisttohipratiobetterthanbmitopredictrecurrentpregnancyloss |