Cargando…
Systemic therapy of MSCs in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: Over the past decades, many studies focused on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy for bone regeneration. Due to the efficiency of topical application has been widely dicussed and systemic application was also a feasible way for new bone formation, the aim of this study was to systemat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02456-w |
_version_ | 1783717682920554496 |
---|---|
author | Fu, Jingfei Wang, Yanxue Jiang, Yiyang Du, Juan Xu, Junji Liu, Yi |
author_facet | Fu, Jingfei Wang, Yanxue Jiang, Yiyang Du, Juan Xu, Junji Liu, Yi |
author_sort | Fu, Jingfei |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Over the past decades, many studies focused on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy for bone regeneration. Due to the efficiency of topical application has been widely dicussed and systemic application was also a feasible way for new bone formation, the aim of this study was to systematically review systemic therapy of MSCs for bone regeneration in pre-clinical studies. METHODS: The article search was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases. Original research articles that assessed potential effect of systemic application of MSCs for bone regeneration in vivo were selected and evaluated in this review, according to eligibility criteria. The efficacy of MSC systemic treatment was analyzed by random effects meta-analysis, and the outcomes were expressed in standard mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval. Subgroup analyses were conducted on animal species and gender, MSCs types, frequency and time of injection, and bone diseases. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles were selected in this review, of which 21 were included in meta-analysis. The results showed that systemic therapy increased bone mineral density (SMD 3.02 [1.84, 4.20]), bone volume to tissue volume ratio (2.10 [1.16, 3.03]), and the percentage of new bone area (7.03 [2.10, 11.96]). Bone loss caused by systemic disease tended to produce a better response to systemic treatment (p=0.05 in BMD, p=0.03 in BV/TV). CONCLUSION: This study concluded that systemic therapy of MSCs promotes bone regeneration in preclinical experiments. These results provided important information for the systemic application of MSCs as a potential application of bone formation in further animal experiments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-021-02456-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8254211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82542112021-07-06 Systemic therapy of MSCs in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fu, Jingfei Wang, Yanxue Jiang, Yiyang Du, Juan Xu, Junji Liu, Yi Stem Cell Res Ther Review OBJECTIVES: Over the past decades, many studies focused on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy for bone regeneration. Due to the efficiency of topical application has been widely dicussed and systemic application was also a feasible way for new bone formation, the aim of this study was to systematically review systemic therapy of MSCs for bone regeneration in pre-clinical studies. METHODS: The article search was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases. Original research articles that assessed potential effect of systemic application of MSCs for bone regeneration in vivo were selected and evaluated in this review, according to eligibility criteria. The efficacy of MSC systemic treatment was analyzed by random effects meta-analysis, and the outcomes were expressed in standard mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval. Subgroup analyses were conducted on animal species and gender, MSCs types, frequency and time of injection, and bone diseases. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles were selected in this review, of which 21 were included in meta-analysis. The results showed that systemic therapy increased bone mineral density (SMD 3.02 [1.84, 4.20]), bone volume to tissue volume ratio (2.10 [1.16, 3.03]), and the percentage of new bone area (7.03 [2.10, 11.96]). Bone loss caused by systemic disease tended to produce a better response to systemic treatment (p=0.05 in BMD, p=0.03 in BV/TV). CONCLUSION: This study concluded that systemic therapy of MSCs promotes bone regeneration in preclinical experiments. These results provided important information for the systemic application of MSCs as a potential application of bone formation in further animal experiments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-021-02456-w. BioMed Central 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8254211/ /pubmed/34215342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02456-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Fu, Jingfei Wang, Yanxue Jiang, Yiyang Du, Juan Xu, Junji Liu, Yi Systemic therapy of MSCs in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Systemic therapy of MSCs in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Systemic therapy of MSCs in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Systemic therapy of MSCs in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Systemic therapy of MSCs in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Systemic therapy of MSCs in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | systemic therapy of mscs in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02456-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujingfei systemictherapyofmscsinboneregenerationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangyanxue systemictherapyofmscsinboneregenerationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiangyiyang systemictherapyofmscsinboneregenerationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dujuan systemictherapyofmscsinboneregenerationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xujunji systemictherapyofmscsinboneregenerationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuyi systemictherapyofmscsinboneregenerationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |