Cargando…
A cannabis oracle? Delphi method not a substitute for randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids as therapeutics
BACKGROUND: With millions of people using cannabinoids to treat a host of medical conditions, clinicians want guidance on how to utilize cannabinoids as pharmacotherapy in their practices. The Delphi method is a systematic, interactive forecasting method that aims to develop consensus best practices...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00074-0 |
_version_ | 1783717692339912704 |
---|---|
author | Hill, Kevin P. Abrams, Donald I. |
author_facet | Hill, Kevin P. Abrams, Donald I. |
author_sort | Hill, Kevin P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With millions of people using cannabinoids to treat a host of medical conditions, clinicians want guidance on how to utilize cannabinoids as pharmacotherapy in their practices. The Delphi method is a systematic, interactive forecasting method that aims to develop consensus best practices where guidelines are not available. BODY: A multidisciplinary group of global cannabinoid experts utilized a modified Delphi process to develop three protocols for the dosing and administration of cannabinoids to treat chronic pain. Two protocols recommend cannabidiol (CBD), for which there is limited evidence as an analgesic, starting well below doses required for other indications. Guidance on prescribing CBD for pain may demonstrate consensus recommendations based upon suboptimal evidence. CONCLUSION: Consensus processes like the Delphi method are well-meaning, but they are not a substitute for rigorous RCTs with large sample sizes, adequate duration, and standardized outcome measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8254257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82542572021-07-06 A cannabis oracle? Delphi method not a substitute for randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids as therapeutics Hill, Kevin P. Abrams, Donald I. J Cannabis Res Commentary BACKGROUND: With millions of people using cannabinoids to treat a host of medical conditions, clinicians want guidance on how to utilize cannabinoids as pharmacotherapy in their practices. The Delphi method is a systematic, interactive forecasting method that aims to develop consensus best practices where guidelines are not available. BODY: A multidisciplinary group of global cannabinoid experts utilized a modified Delphi process to develop three protocols for the dosing and administration of cannabinoids to treat chronic pain. Two protocols recommend cannabidiol (CBD), for which there is limited evidence as an analgesic, starting well below doses required for other indications. Guidance on prescribing CBD for pain may demonstrate consensus recommendations based upon suboptimal evidence. CONCLUSION: Consensus processes like the Delphi method are well-meaning, but they are not a substitute for rigorous RCTs with large sample sizes, adequate duration, and standardized outcome measures. BioMed Central 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8254257/ /pubmed/34215325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00074-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Commentary Hill, Kevin P. Abrams, Donald I. A cannabis oracle? Delphi method not a substitute for randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids as therapeutics |
title | A cannabis oracle? Delphi method not a substitute for randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids as therapeutics |
title_full | A cannabis oracle? Delphi method not a substitute for randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids as therapeutics |
title_fullStr | A cannabis oracle? Delphi method not a substitute for randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids as therapeutics |
title_full_unstemmed | A cannabis oracle? Delphi method not a substitute for randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids as therapeutics |
title_short | A cannabis oracle? Delphi method not a substitute for randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids as therapeutics |
title_sort | cannabis oracle? delphi method not a substitute for randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids as therapeutics |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00074-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hillkevinp acannabisoracledelphimethodnotasubstituteforrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofcannabinoidsastherapeutics AT abramsdonaldi acannabisoracledelphimethodnotasubstituteforrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofcannabinoidsastherapeutics AT hillkevinp cannabisoracledelphimethodnotasubstituteforrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofcannabinoidsastherapeutics AT abramsdonaldi cannabisoracledelphimethodnotasubstituteforrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofcannabinoidsastherapeutics |