Cargando…

Biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical stability of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation and lumbopelvic fixation for “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation. METHODS: Finite element models of “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Ye, Zhang, Gongzi, Zhang, Shuwei, Ji, Xinran, Li, Junwei, Du, Chengfei, Zhao, Wen, Zhang, Lihai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02581-5
_version_ 1783717706220961792
author Peng, Ye
Zhang, Gongzi
Zhang, Shuwei
Ji, Xinran
Li, Junwei
Du, Chengfei
Zhao, Wen
Zhang, Lihai
author_facet Peng, Ye
Zhang, Gongzi
Zhang, Shuwei
Ji, Xinran
Li, Junwei
Du, Chengfei
Zhao, Wen
Zhang, Lihai
author_sort Peng, Ye
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical stability of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation and lumbopelvic fixation for “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation. METHODS: Finite element models of “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation were created in this study. The models mimicked the standing position of a human. Fixation with transsacral-transiliac screw fixation, lumbopelvic fixation, and bilateral triangular fixation were simulated. Biomechanical tests of instability were performed, and the fracture gap displacement, anteflexion, rotation, and stress distribution after fixation were assessed. RESULTS: For H-type fractures, the three kinds of fixation ranked by stability were bilateral triangular fixation > lumbopelvic fixation > transsacral-transiliac screw fixation in the vertical and anteflexion directions, bilateral triangular fixation > transsacral-transiliac S1 and S2 screw fixation > lumbopelvic fixation in rotation. The largest displacements in the vertical, anteflexion, and rotational directions were 0.57234 mm, 0.37923 mm, and 0.13076 mm, respectively. For U-type fractures, these kinds of fixation ranked by stability were bilateral triangular fixation > lumbopelvic fixation > transsacral-transiliac S1 and S2 screw fixation > transsacral-transiliac S1 screw fixation in the vertical, anteflexion, and rotational directions. The largest displacements in the vertical, anteflexion, and rotational directions were 0.38296 mm, 0.33976 mm, and 0.05064 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: All these kinds of fixation met the mechanical criteria for clinical applications. The biomechanical analysis showed better bilateral balance with transsacral-transiliac screw fixation. The maximal displacement for these types of fixation was less than 1 mm. Percutaneous transsacral-transiliac screw fixation can be considered the best option among these kinds of fracture fixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8254325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82543252021-07-06 Biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study Peng, Ye Zhang, Gongzi Zhang, Shuwei Ji, Xinran Li, Junwei Du, Chengfei Zhao, Wen Zhang, Lihai J Orthop Surg Res Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical stability of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation and lumbopelvic fixation for “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation. METHODS: Finite element models of “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation were created in this study. The models mimicked the standing position of a human. Fixation with transsacral-transiliac screw fixation, lumbopelvic fixation, and bilateral triangular fixation were simulated. Biomechanical tests of instability were performed, and the fracture gap displacement, anteflexion, rotation, and stress distribution after fixation were assessed. RESULTS: For H-type fractures, the three kinds of fixation ranked by stability were bilateral triangular fixation > lumbopelvic fixation > transsacral-transiliac screw fixation in the vertical and anteflexion directions, bilateral triangular fixation > transsacral-transiliac S1 and S2 screw fixation > lumbopelvic fixation in rotation. The largest displacements in the vertical, anteflexion, and rotational directions were 0.57234 mm, 0.37923 mm, and 0.13076 mm, respectively. For U-type fractures, these kinds of fixation ranked by stability were bilateral triangular fixation > lumbopelvic fixation > transsacral-transiliac S1 and S2 screw fixation > transsacral-transiliac S1 screw fixation in the vertical, anteflexion, and rotational directions. The largest displacements in the vertical, anteflexion, and rotational directions were 0.38296 mm, 0.33976 mm, and 0.05064 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: All these kinds of fixation met the mechanical criteria for clinical applications. The biomechanical analysis showed better bilateral balance with transsacral-transiliac screw fixation. The maximal displacement for these types of fixation was less than 1 mm. Percutaneous transsacral-transiliac screw fixation can be considered the best option among these kinds of fracture fixation. BioMed Central 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8254325/ /pubmed/34217358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02581-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peng, Ye
Zhang, Gongzi
Zhang, Shuwei
Ji, Xinran
Li, Junwei
Du, Chengfei
Zhao, Wen
Zhang, Lihai
Biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study
title Biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study
title_full Biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study
title_fullStr Biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study
title_short Biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for “H”- and “U”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study
title_sort biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for “h”- and “u”-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02581-5
work_keys_str_mv AT pengye biomechanicalstudyoftranssacraltransiliacscrewfixationversuslumbopelvicfixationandbilateraltriangularfixationforhandutypesacrumfractureswithtraumaticspondylopelvicdissociationafiniteelementanalysisstudy
AT zhanggongzi biomechanicalstudyoftranssacraltransiliacscrewfixationversuslumbopelvicfixationandbilateraltriangularfixationforhandutypesacrumfractureswithtraumaticspondylopelvicdissociationafiniteelementanalysisstudy
AT zhangshuwei biomechanicalstudyoftranssacraltransiliacscrewfixationversuslumbopelvicfixationandbilateraltriangularfixationforhandutypesacrumfractureswithtraumaticspondylopelvicdissociationafiniteelementanalysisstudy
AT jixinran biomechanicalstudyoftranssacraltransiliacscrewfixationversuslumbopelvicfixationandbilateraltriangularfixationforhandutypesacrumfractureswithtraumaticspondylopelvicdissociationafiniteelementanalysisstudy
AT lijunwei biomechanicalstudyoftranssacraltransiliacscrewfixationversuslumbopelvicfixationandbilateraltriangularfixationforhandutypesacrumfractureswithtraumaticspondylopelvicdissociationafiniteelementanalysisstudy
AT duchengfei biomechanicalstudyoftranssacraltransiliacscrewfixationversuslumbopelvicfixationandbilateraltriangularfixationforhandutypesacrumfractureswithtraumaticspondylopelvicdissociationafiniteelementanalysisstudy
AT zhaowen biomechanicalstudyoftranssacraltransiliacscrewfixationversuslumbopelvicfixationandbilateraltriangularfixationforhandutypesacrumfractureswithtraumaticspondylopelvicdissociationafiniteelementanalysisstudy
AT zhanglihai biomechanicalstudyoftranssacraltransiliacscrewfixationversuslumbopelvicfixationandbilateraltriangularfixationforhandutypesacrumfractureswithtraumaticspondylopelvicdissociationafiniteelementanalysisstudy