Cargando…

Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system

BACKGROUND: The Opti_Knee system, a marker-based motion capture system, tracks and analyzes the 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) motion of the knee joint. However, the validation of the accuracy of this gait system had not been previously reported. The objective of this study was to validate and the syst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Shaobai, Zeng, Xiaolong, Huangfu, Liang, Xie, Zhenyan, Ma, Limin, Huang, Wenhan, Zhang, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02576-2
_version_ 1783717706473668608
author Wang, Shaobai
Zeng, Xiaolong
Huangfu, Liang
Xie, Zhenyan
Ma, Limin
Huang, Wenhan
Zhang, Yu
author_facet Wang, Shaobai
Zeng, Xiaolong
Huangfu, Liang
Xie, Zhenyan
Ma, Limin
Huang, Wenhan
Zhang, Yu
author_sort Wang, Shaobai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Opti_Knee system, a marker-based motion capture system, tracks and analyzes the 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) motion of the knee joint. However, the validation of the accuracy of this gait system had not been previously reported. The objective of this study was to validate and the system. Two healthy subjects were recruited for the study. METHODS: The 6DOF kinematics of the knee during flexion–extension and level walking cycles of the knee were recorded by Opti_Knee and compared to those from a biplanar fluoroscopy system. The root mean square error (RMSE) of knee kinematics in flexion–extension cycles were compared between the two systems to validate the accuracy at which they detect basic knee motions. The RMSE of kinematics at key events of gait cycles (level walking) were compared to validate the accuracy at which the systems detect functional knee motion. Pearson correlation tests were conducted to assess similarities in knee kinematic trends between the two systems. RESULTS: In flexion–extension cycles, the average translational accuracy (RMSE) was between 2.7 and 3.7 mm and the average rotational accuracy was between 1.7 and 3.8°. The Pearson correlation of coefficients for flexion–extension cycles was between 0.858 and 0.994 for translation and 0.995-0.999 for angles. In gait cycles, the RMSEs of angular knee kinematics were 2.3° for adduction/abduction, 3.2° for internal/external rotation, and 1.4° for flexion/extension. The RMSEs of translational kinematics were 4.2 mm for anterior/posterior translation, 3.3 mm for distal/proximal translation, and 3.2 mm for medial/lateral translation. The Pearson correlation of coefficients values was between 0.964 and 0.999 for angular kinematics and 0.883 and 0.938 for translational kinematics. CONCLUSION: The Opti_Knee gait system exhibited acceptable accuracy and strong correlation strength compared to biplanar fluoroscopy. The Opti _Knee may serve as a promising portable clinical system for dynamic functional assessments of the knee. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02576-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8254326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82543262021-07-06 Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system Wang, Shaobai Zeng, Xiaolong Huangfu, Liang Xie, Zhenyan Ma, Limin Huang, Wenhan Zhang, Yu J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Opti_Knee system, a marker-based motion capture system, tracks and analyzes the 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) motion of the knee joint. However, the validation of the accuracy of this gait system had not been previously reported. The objective of this study was to validate and the system. Two healthy subjects were recruited for the study. METHODS: The 6DOF kinematics of the knee during flexion–extension and level walking cycles of the knee were recorded by Opti_Knee and compared to those from a biplanar fluoroscopy system. The root mean square error (RMSE) of knee kinematics in flexion–extension cycles were compared between the two systems to validate the accuracy at which they detect basic knee motions. The RMSE of kinematics at key events of gait cycles (level walking) were compared to validate the accuracy at which the systems detect functional knee motion. Pearson correlation tests were conducted to assess similarities in knee kinematic trends between the two systems. RESULTS: In flexion–extension cycles, the average translational accuracy (RMSE) was between 2.7 and 3.7 mm and the average rotational accuracy was between 1.7 and 3.8°. The Pearson correlation of coefficients for flexion–extension cycles was between 0.858 and 0.994 for translation and 0.995-0.999 for angles. In gait cycles, the RMSEs of angular knee kinematics were 2.3° for adduction/abduction, 3.2° for internal/external rotation, and 1.4° for flexion/extension. The RMSEs of translational kinematics were 4.2 mm for anterior/posterior translation, 3.3 mm for distal/proximal translation, and 3.2 mm for medial/lateral translation. The Pearson correlation of coefficients values was between 0.964 and 0.999 for angular kinematics and 0.883 and 0.938 for translational kinematics. CONCLUSION: The Opti_Knee gait system exhibited acceptable accuracy and strong correlation strength compared to biplanar fluoroscopy. The Opti _Knee may serve as a promising portable clinical system for dynamic functional assessments of the knee. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02576-2. BioMed Central 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8254326/ /pubmed/34217352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02576-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Shaobai
Zeng, Xiaolong
Huangfu, Liang
Xie, Zhenyan
Ma, Limin
Huang, Wenhan
Zhang, Yu
Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system
title Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system
title_full Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system
title_fullStr Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system
title_short Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system
title_sort validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02576-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wangshaobai validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem
AT zengxiaolong validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem
AT huangfuliang validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem
AT xiezhenyan validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem
AT malimin validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem
AT huangwenhan validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem
AT zhangyu validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem