Cargando…
Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system
BACKGROUND: The Opti_Knee system, a marker-based motion capture system, tracks and analyzes the 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) motion of the knee joint. However, the validation of the accuracy of this gait system had not been previously reported. The objective of this study was to validate and the syst...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02576-2 |
_version_ | 1783717706473668608 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Shaobai Zeng, Xiaolong Huangfu, Liang Xie, Zhenyan Ma, Limin Huang, Wenhan Zhang, Yu |
author_facet | Wang, Shaobai Zeng, Xiaolong Huangfu, Liang Xie, Zhenyan Ma, Limin Huang, Wenhan Zhang, Yu |
author_sort | Wang, Shaobai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Opti_Knee system, a marker-based motion capture system, tracks and analyzes the 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) motion of the knee joint. However, the validation of the accuracy of this gait system had not been previously reported. The objective of this study was to validate and the system. Two healthy subjects were recruited for the study. METHODS: The 6DOF kinematics of the knee during flexion–extension and level walking cycles of the knee were recorded by Opti_Knee and compared to those from a biplanar fluoroscopy system. The root mean square error (RMSE) of knee kinematics in flexion–extension cycles were compared between the two systems to validate the accuracy at which they detect basic knee motions. The RMSE of kinematics at key events of gait cycles (level walking) were compared to validate the accuracy at which the systems detect functional knee motion. Pearson correlation tests were conducted to assess similarities in knee kinematic trends between the two systems. RESULTS: In flexion–extension cycles, the average translational accuracy (RMSE) was between 2.7 and 3.7 mm and the average rotational accuracy was between 1.7 and 3.8°. The Pearson correlation of coefficients for flexion–extension cycles was between 0.858 and 0.994 for translation and 0.995-0.999 for angles. In gait cycles, the RMSEs of angular knee kinematics were 2.3° for adduction/abduction, 3.2° for internal/external rotation, and 1.4° for flexion/extension. The RMSEs of translational kinematics were 4.2 mm for anterior/posterior translation, 3.3 mm for distal/proximal translation, and 3.2 mm for medial/lateral translation. The Pearson correlation of coefficients values was between 0.964 and 0.999 for angular kinematics and 0.883 and 0.938 for translational kinematics. CONCLUSION: The Opti_Knee gait system exhibited acceptable accuracy and strong correlation strength compared to biplanar fluoroscopy. The Opti _Knee may serve as a promising portable clinical system for dynamic functional assessments of the knee. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02576-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8254326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82543262021-07-06 Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system Wang, Shaobai Zeng, Xiaolong Huangfu, Liang Xie, Zhenyan Ma, Limin Huang, Wenhan Zhang, Yu J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Opti_Knee system, a marker-based motion capture system, tracks and analyzes the 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) motion of the knee joint. However, the validation of the accuracy of this gait system had not been previously reported. The objective of this study was to validate and the system. Two healthy subjects were recruited for the study. METHODS: The 6DOF kinematics of the knee during flexion–extension and level walking cycles of the knee were recorded by Opti_Knee and compared to those from a biplanar fluoroscopy system. The root mean square error (RMSE) of knee kinematics in flexion–extension cycles were compared between the two systems to validate the accuracy at which they detect basic knee motions. The RMSE of kinematics at key events of gait cycles (level walking) were compared to validate the accuracy at which the systems detect functional knee motion. Pearson correlation tests were conducted to assess similarities in knee kinematic trends between the two systems. RESULTS: In flexion–extension cycles, the average translational accuracy (RMSE) was between 2.7 and 3.7 mm and the average rotational accuracy was between 1.7 and 3.8°. The Pearson correlation of coefficients for flexion–extension cycles was between 0.858 and 0.994 for translation and 0.995-0.999 for angles. In gait cycles, the RMSEs of angular knee kinematics were 2.3° for adduction/abduction, 3.2° for internal/external rotation, and 1.4° for flexion/extension. The RMSEs of translational kinematics were 4.2 mm for anterior/posterior translation, 3.3 mm for distal/proximal translation, and 3.2 mm for medial/lateral translation. The Pearson correlation of coefficients values was between 0.964 and 0.999 for angular kinematics and 0.883 and 0.938 for translational kinematics. CONCLUSION: The Opti_Knee gait system exhibited acceptable accuracy and strong correlation strength compared to biplanar fluoroscopy. The Opti _Knee may serve as a promising portable clinical system for dynamic functional assessments of the knee. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02576-2. BioMed Central 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8254326/ /pubmed/34217352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02576-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Shaobai Zeng, Xiaolong Huangfu, Liang Xie, Zhenyan Ma, Limin Huang, Wenhan Zhang, Yu Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system |
title | Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system |
title_full | Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system |
title_fullStr | Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system |
title_short | Validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system |
title_sort | validation of a portable marker-based motion analysis system |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02576-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangshaobai validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem AT zengxiaolong validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem AT huangfuliang validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem AT xiezhenyan validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem AT malimin validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem AT huangwenhan validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem AT zhangyu validationofaportablemarkerbasedmotionanalysissystem |