Cargando…
Pre-processing tissue specimens with a tissue homogenizer: clinical and microbiological evaluation
BACKGROUND: Tissues are valuable specimens in diagnostic microbiology because they are often obtained by invasive methods, and effort should thus be taken to maximize microbiological yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate the added value of using tissue pre-processing (tissue homogenizer...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02271-6 |
_version_ | 1783717706705403904 |
---|---|
author | Yusuf, Erlangga Pronk, Marieke van Westreenen, Mireille |
author_facet | Yusuf, Erlangga Pronk, Marieke van Westreenen, Mireille |
author_sort | Yusuf, Erlangga |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tissues are valuable specimens in diagnostic microbiology because they are often obtained by invasive methods, and effort should thus be taken to maximize microbiological yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate the added value of using tissue pre-processing (tissue homogenizer instrument gentleMACS Dissociator) in detecting microorganisms responsible for infections. METHODS: We included 104 randomly collected tissue samples, 41 (39.4 %) bones and 63 (60.6 %) soft tissues, many of those (42/104 (40.4 %)) were of periprosthetic origins. We compared the agreement between pre-processing tissues using tissue homogenizer with routine microbiology diagnostic procedure, and we calculated the performance of these methods when clinical infections were used as reference standard. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two methods (McNemar test, p = 0.3). Among the positive culture using both methods (n = 62), 61 (98.4 %) showed at least one similar microorganism. Exactly similar microorganisms were found in 42/62 (67.7 %) of the samples. From the included tissues, 55/ 104 (52.9 %) were deemed as infected. We found that the sensitivity of homogenized tissue procedure was lower (83.6 %) than when tissue was processed using tissue homogenizer (89.1 %). Sub-analysis on periprosthetic tissues and soft or bone tissues showed comparable results. CONCLUSIONS: The added value of GentleMACS Dissociator tissue homogenizer is limited in comparison to routine tissue processing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-021-02271-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8254327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82543272021-07-06 Pre-processing tissue specimens with a tissue homogenizer: clinical and microbiological evaluation Yusuf, Erlangga Pronk, Marieke van Westreenen, Mireille BMC Microbiol Research BACKGROUND: Tissues are valuable specimens in diagnostic microbiology because they are often obtained by invasive methods, and effort should thus be taken to maximize microbiological yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate the added value of using tissue pre-processing (tissue homogenizer instrument gentleMACS Dissociator) in detecting microorganisms responsible for infections. METHODS: We included 104 randomly collected tissue samples, 41 (39.4 %) bones and 63 (60.6 %) soft tissues, many of those (42/104 (40.4 %)) were of periprosthetic origins. We compared the agreement between pre-processing tissues using tissue homogenizer with routine microbiology diagnostic procedure, and we calculated the performance of these methods when clinical infections were used as reference standard. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two methods (McNemar test, p = 0.3). Among the positive culture using both methods (n = 62), 61 (98.4 %) showed at least one similar microorganism. Exactly similar microorganisms were found in 42/62 (67.7 %) of the samples. From the included tissues, 55/ 104 (52.9 %) were deemed as infected. We found that the sensitivity of homogenized tissue procedure was lower (83.6 %) than when tissue was processed using tissue homogenizer (89.1 %). Sub-analysis on periprosthetic tissues and soft or bone tissues showed comparable results. CONCLUSIONS: The added value of GentleMACS Dissociator tissue homogenizer is limited in comparison to routine tissue processing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-021-02271-6. BioMed Central 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8254327/ /pubmed/34215175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02271-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Yusuf, Erlangga Pronk, Marieke van Westreenen, Mireille Pre-processing tissue specimens with a tissue homogenizer: clinical and microbiological evaluation |
title | Pre-processing tissue specimens with a tissue homogenizer: clinical and microbiological evaluation |
title_full | Pre-processing tissue specimens with a tissue homogenizer: clinical and microbiological evaluation |
title_fullStr | Pre-processing tissue specimens with a tissue homogenizer: clinical and microbiological evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Pre-processing tissue specimens with a tissue homogenizer: clinical and microbiological evaluation |
title_short | Pre-processing tissue specimens with a tissue homogenizer: clinical and microbiological evaluation |
title_sort | pre-processing tissue specimens with a tissue homogenizer: clinical and microbiological evaluation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02271-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yusuferlangga preprocessingtissuespecimenswithatissuehomogenizerclinicalandmicrobiologicalevaluation AT pronkmarieke preprocessingtissuespecimenswithatissuehomogenizerclinicalandmicrobiologicalevaluation AT vanwestreenenmireille preprocessingtissuespecimenswithatissuehomogenizerclinicalandmicrobiologicalevaluation |