Cargando…
Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Access to health care is a universal concern. Therefore, this study was conducted to develop a questionnaire to assess the Perceived Access to Health care based on Penchansky and Thomas’s definition of access and the assessment of its psychometric properties. METHOD: The in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06655-2 |
_version_ | 1783717713512759296 |
---|---|
author | Hoseini-Esfidarjani, Sara-Sadat Negarandeh, Reza Delavar, Farzaneh Janani, Leila |
author_facet | Hoseini-Esfidarjani, Sara-Sadat Negarandeh, Reza Delavar, Farzaneh Janani, Leila |
author_sort | Hoseini-Esfidarjani, Sara-Sadat |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Access to health care is a universal concern. Therefore, this study was conducted to develop a questionnaire to assess the Perceived Access to Health care based on Penchansky and Thomas’s definition of access and the assessment of its psychometric properties. METHOD: The initial questionnaire contains 31 items developed based on a deductive approach with an extensive review of the related literature. Content validity, face validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and instrument reliability were further examined. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software version 24, R software version 4, and lavaan package. RESULTS: The initial questionnaire was examined using qualitative content validity, and the necessary modifications were applied to each item. The content validity ratio (CVR) was approved in 30 items with a value greater than 0.78, and one item with a CVR value lower than 0.78 was removed. In the case of the content validity index (CVI), 29 items were approved with a CVI value of greater than 0.79, and one item with a CVI value between 0.70 and 0.79 was revised. In qualitative face validity, all items were approved by a panel of experts and the participants. All 30 items with an impact score index higher than 1.5 were approved for the next steps. The confirmatory factor analysis results showed that the six-factor model of access to health care has an appropriate fit. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the questionnaire was calculated 0.86. The value of Cronbach’s alpha for the dimensions of availability, accessibility, affordability, accommodation, acceptability, and awareness were 0.61, 0.76, 0.66, 0.60, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively. The Intraclass Correlation Index (ICC) value for reliability (test-retest) of the whole instrument was calculated 0.94 using the two-way mixed absolute agreement method. CONCLUSION: The success of health programs depends on eliminating barriers to access to provided health care services. One of the most critical barriers to understanding access is a perception of limited access. This questionnaire might be used further to understand perceived health care access in different global contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06655-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8254360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82543602021-07-06 Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire Hoseini-Esfidarjani, Sara-Sadat Negarandeh, Reza Delavar, Farzaneh Janani, Leila BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Access to health care is a universal concern. Therefore, this study was conducted to develop a questionnaire to assess the Perceived Access to Health care based on Penchansky and Thomas’s definition of access and the assessment of its psychometric properties. METHOD: The initial questionnaire contains 31 items developed based on a deductive approach with an extensive review of the related literature. Content validity, face validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and instrument reliability were further examined. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software version 24, R software version 4, and lavaan package. RESULTS: The initial questionnaire was examined using qualitative content validity, and the necessary modifications were applied to each item. The content validity ratio (CVR) was approved in 30 items with a value greater than 0.78, and one item with a CVR value lower than 0.78 was removed. In the case of the content validity index (CVI), 29 items were approved with a CVI value of greater than 0.79, and one item with a CVI value between 0.70 and 0.79 was revised. In qualitative face validity, all items were approved by a panel of experts and the participants. All 30 items with an impact score index higher than 1.5 were approved for the next steps. The confirmatory factor analysis results showed that the six-factor model of access to health care has an appropriate fit. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the questionnaire was calculated 0.86. The value of Cronbach’s alpha for the dimensions of availability, accessibility, affordability, accommodation, acceptability, and awareness were 0.61, 0.76, 0.66, 0.60, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively. The Intraclass Correlation Index (ICC) value for reliability (test-retest) of the whole instrument was calculated 0.94 using the two-way mixed absolute agreement method. CONCLUSION: The success of health programs depends on eliminating barriers to access to provided health care services. One of the most critical barriers to understanding access is a perception of limited access. This questionnaire might be used further to understand perceived health care access in different global contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06655-2. BioMed Central 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8254360/ /pubmed/34215250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06655-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hoseini-Esfidarjani, Sara-Sadat Negarandeh, Reza Delavar, Farzaneh Janani, Leila Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire |
title | Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire |
title_full | Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire |
title_short | Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire |
title_sort | psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34215250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06655-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoseiniesfidarjanisarasadat psychometricevaluationoftheperceivedaccesstohealthcarequestionnaire AT negarandehreza psychometricevaluationoftheperceivedaccesstohealthcarequestionnaire AT delavarfarzaneh psychometricevaluationoftheperceivedaccesstohealthcarequestionnaire AT jananileila psychometricevaluationoftheperceivedaccesstohealthcarequestionnaire |