Cargando…

Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: Results of a Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Research indicates intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a potential treatment of post-stroke aphasia. MATERIAL/METHODS: In this double-blind, sham-controlled trial (NCT 01512264) participants were randomized to receive 3 weeks of sham (G(0)), 1 week of iTBS/2 weeks of sham (G(1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szaflarski, Jerzy P., Nenert, Rodolphe, Allendorfer, Jane B., Martin, Amber N., Amara, Amy W., Griffis, Joseph C., Dietz, Aimee, Mark, Victor W., Sung, Victor W., Walker, Harrison C., Zhou, Xiaohua, Lindsell, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34183640
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.931468
_version_ 1783717725700358144
author Szaflarski, Jerzy P.
Nenert, Rodolphe
Allendorfer, Jane B.
Martin, Amber N.
Amara, Amy W.
Griffis, Joseph C.
Dietz, Aimee
Mark, Victor W.
Sung, Victor W.
Walker, Harrison C.
Zhou, Xiaohua
Lindsell, Christopher J.
author_facet Szaflarski, Jerzy P.
Nenert, Rodolphe
Allendorfer, Jane B.
Martin, Amber N.
Amara, Amy W.
Griffis, Joseph C.
Dietz, Aimee
Mark, Victor W.
Sung, Victor W.
Walker, Harrison C.
Zhou, Xiaohua
Lindsell, Christopher J.
author_sort Szaflarski, Jerzy P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research indicates intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a potential treatment of post-stroke aphasia. MATERIAL/METHODS: In this double-blind, sham-controlled trial (NCT 01512264) participants were randomized to receive 3 weeks of sham (G(0)), 1 week of iTBS/2 weeks of sham (G(1)), 2 weeks of iTBS/1 week of sham (G(2)), or 3 weeks of iTBS (G(3)). FMRI localized residual language function in the left hemisphere; iTBS was applied to the maximum fMRI activation in the residual language cortex in the left frontal lobe. FMRI and aphasia testing were conducted pre-treatment, at ≤1 week after completing treatment, and at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: 27/36 participants completed the trial. We compared G(0) to each of the individual treatment group and to all iTBS treatment groups combined (G(1–3)). In individual groups, participants gained (of moderate or large effect sizes; some significant at P<0.05) on the Boston Naming Test (BNT), the Semantic Fluency Test (SFT), and the Aphasia Quotient of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R AQ). In G(1–3), BNT, and SFT improved immediately after treatment, while the WAB-R AQ improved at 3 months. Compared to G(0), the other groups showed greater fMRI activation in both hemispheres and non-significant increases in language lateralization to the left hemisphere. Changes in IFG connectivity were noted with iTBS, showing differences between time-points, with some of them correlating with the behavioral measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot trial support the hypothesis that iTBS applied to the ipsilesional hemisphere can improve aphasia and result in cortical plasticity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8254416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82544162021-07-16 Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: Results of a Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial Szaflarski, Jerzy P. Nenert, Rodolphe Allendorfer, Jane B. Martin, Amber N. Amara, Amy W. Griffis, Joseph C. Dietz, Aimee Mark, Victor W. Sung, Victor W. Walker, Harrison C. Zhou, Xiaohua Lindsell, Christopher J. Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Research indicates intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a potential treatment of post-stroke aphasia. MATERIAL/METHODS: In this double-blind, sham-controlled trial (NCT 01512264) participants were randomized to receive 3 weeks of sham (G(0)), 1 week of iTBS/2 weeks of sham (G(1)), 2 weeks of iTBS/1 week of sham (G(2)), or 3 weeks of iTBS (G(3)). FMRI localized residual language function in the left hemisphere; iTBS was applied to the maximum fMRI activation in the residual language cortex in the left frontal lobe. FMRI and aphasia testing were conducted pre-treatment, at ≤1 week after completing treatment, and at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: 27/36 participants completed the trial. We compared G(0) to each of the individual treatment group and to all iTBS treatment groups combined (G(1–3)). In individual groups, participants gained (of moderate or large effect sizes; some significant at P<0.05) on the Boston Naming Test (BNT), the Semantic Fluency Test (SFT), and the Aphasia Quotient of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R AQ). In G(1–3), BNT, and SFT improved immediately after treatment, while the WAB-R AQ improved at 3 months. Compared to G(0), the other groups showed greater fMRI activation in both hemispheres and non-significant increases in language lateralization to the left hemisphere. Changes in IFG connectivity were noted with iTBS, showing differences between time-points, with some of them correlating with the behavioral measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot trial support the hypothesis that iTBS applied to the ipsilesional hemisphere can improve aphasia and result in cortical plasticity. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8254416/ /pubmed/34183640 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.931468 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Szaflarski, Jerzy P.
Nenert, Rodolphe
Allendorfer, Jane B.
Martin, Amber N.
Amara, Amy W.
Griffis, Joseph C.
Dietz, Aimee
Mark, Victor W.
Sung, Victor W.
Walker, Harrison C.
Zhou, Xiaohua
Lindsell, Christopher J.
Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: Results of a Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: Results of a Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_full Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: Results of a Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: Results of a Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: Results of a Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_short Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for Treatment of Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: Results of a Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_sort intermittent theta burst stimulation (itbs) for treatment of chronic post-stroke aphasia: results of a pilot randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34183640
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.931468
work_keys_str_mv AT szaflarskijerzyp intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT nenertrodolphe intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT allendorferjaneb intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT martinambern intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT amaraamyw intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT griffisjosephc intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT dietzaimee intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT markvictorw intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT sungvictorw intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT walkerharrisonc intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT zhouxiaohua intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT lindsellchristopherj intermittentthetaburststimulationitbsfortreatmentofchronicpoststrokeaphasiaresultsofapilotrandomizeddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial