Cargando…

The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial

Individual identification is fundamental to the study of captive and wild animals but can have adverse impacts if the method of identification is inappropriate for the species or question of interest. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to test whether passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taggart, Patrick L., Morris, Stephen, Caraguel, Charles G.B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34249487
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11531
_version_ 1783717737820848128
author Taggart, Patrick L.
Morris, Stephen
Caraguel, Charles G.B.
author_facet Taggart, Patrick L.
Morris, Stephen
Caraguel, Charles G.B.
author_sort Taggart, Patrick L.
collection PubMed
description Individual identification is fundamental to the study of captive and wild animals but can have adverse impacts if the method of identification is inappropriate for the species or question of interest. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to test whether passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags reduced the growth or survival of pythons. We randomly allocated 200 captive-bred Burmese python (Python bivittatus) hatchlings into two groups, tagged versus untagged. Hatchlings were individually identified using a combination of PIT tags and unique colour patterns, and their mass, snout-vent length (SVL) and body condition measured at 9, 73, 134, 220, 292 and 385 days of age. We recorded the date of all mortalities. Python morphometrics and their rate of change increased or fluctuated non-linearly with age. The impact of PIT tagging on python body mass and body mass growth over the 376 day study period was insignificant. PIT tagging additionally had an insignificant impact on python survival. However, we found minor differences in SVL growth between tagged and untagged pythons. These differences peaked at approximately 0.5 mm/day and appeared to drive similar, but more pronounced, differences between tagged and untagged pythons in their rate of change in body condition; peaking at approximately 3–4 g/day. While we cannot be certain that these small differences are, or are not, biologically meaningful, they nonetheless appear to be short-term and readily resolved. Unsurprisingly, the strongest driver of python growth was their age, with growth rapidly increasing or highest amongst younger snakes for all measures of size. Python sex was associated with their body mass and survival, with higher mass but lower survival amongst females. Python size at hatching did not impact on their growth or survival. Our results confirm that PIT tags are a valuable and effective tool for the identification and tracking of captive pythons, and snakes generally, and meet high safety and animal welfare standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8254472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82544722021-07-08 The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial Taggart, Patrick L. Morris, Stephen Caraguel, Charles G.B. PeerJ Biodiversity Individual identification is fundamental to the study of captive and wild animals but can have adverse impacts if the method of identification is inappropriate for the species or question of interest. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to test whether passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags reduced the growth or survival of pythons. We randomly allocated 200 captive-bred Burmese python (Python bivittatus) hatchlings into two groups, tagged versus untagged. Hatchlings were individually identified using a combination of PIT tags and unique colour patterns, and their mass, snout-vent length (SVL) and body condition measured at 9, 73, 134, 220, 292 and 385 days of age. We recorded the date of all mortalities. Python morphometrics and their rate of change increased or fluctuated non-linearly with age. The impact of PIT tagging on python body mass and body mass growth over the 376 day study period was insignificant. PIT tagging additionally had an insignificant impact on python survival. However, we found minor differences in SVL growth between tagged and untagged pythons. These differences peaked at approximately 0.5 mm/day and appeared to drive similar, but more pronounced, differences between tagged and untagged pythons in their rate of change in body condition; peaking at approximately 3–4 g/day. While we cannot be certain that these small differences are, or are not, biologically meaningful, they nonetheless appear to be short-term and readily resolved. Unsurprisingly, the strongest driver of python growth was their age, with growth rapidly increasing or highest amongst younger snakes for all measures of size. Python sex was associated with their body mass and survival, with higher mass but lower survival amongst females. Python size at hatching did not impact on their growth or survival. Our results confirm that PIT tags are a valuable and effective tool for the identification and tracking of captive pythons, and snakes generally, and meet high safety and animal welfare standards. PeerJ Inc. 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8254472/ /pubmed/34249487 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11531 Text en ©2021 Taggart et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Taggart, Patrick L.
Morris, Stephen
Caraguel, Charles G.B.
The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial
title The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial
title_full The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial
title_short The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial
title_sort impact of pit tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial
topic Biodiversity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34249487
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11531
work_keys_str_mv AT taggartpatrickl theimpactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT morrisstephen theimpactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT caraguelcharlesgb theimpactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT taggartpatrickl impactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT morrisstephen impactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT caraguelcharlesgb impactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial