Cargando…
The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial
Individual identification is fundamental to the study of captive and wild animals but can have adverse impacts if the method of identification is inappropriate for the species or question of interest. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to test whether passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34249487 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11531 |
_version_ | 1783717737820848128 |
---|---|
author | Taggart, Patrick L. Morris, Stephen Caraguel, Charles G.B. |
author_facet | Taggart, Patrick L. Morris, Stephen Caraguel, Charles G.B. |
author_sort | Taggart, Patrick L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Individual identification is fundamental to the study of captive and wild animals but can have adverse impacts if the method of identification is inappropriate for the species or question of interest. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to test whether passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags reduced the growth or survival of pythons. We randomly allocated 200 captive-bred Burmese python (Python bivittatus) hatchlings into two groups, tagged versus untagged. Hatchlings were individually identified using a combination of PIT tags and unique colour patterns, and their mass, snout-vent length (SVL) and body condition measured at 9, 73, 134, 220, 292 and 385 days of age. We recorded the date of all mortalities. Python morphometrics and their rate of change increased or fluctuated non-linearly with age. The impact of PIT tagging on python body mass and body mass growth over the 376 day study period was insignificant. PIT tagging additionally had an insignificant impact on python survival. However, we found minor differences in SVL growth between tagged and untagged pythons. These differences peaked at approximately 0.5 mm/day and appeared to drive similar, but more pronounced, differences between tagged and untagged pythons in their rate of change in body condition; peaking at approximately 3–4 g/day. While we cannot be certain that these small differences are, or are not, biologically meaningful, they nonetheless appear to be short-term and readily resolved. Unsurprisingly, the strongest driver of python growth was their age, with growth rapidly increasing or highest amongst younger snakes for all measures of size. Python sex was associated with their body mass and survival, with higher mass but lower survival amongst females. Python size at hatching did not impact on their growth or survival. Our results confirm that PIT tags are a valuable and effective tool for the identification and tracking of captive pythons, and snakes generally, and meet high safety and animal welfare standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8254472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82544722021-07-08 The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial Taggart, Patrick L. Morris, Stephen Caraguel, Charles G.B. PeerJ Biodiversity Individual identification is fundamental to the study of captive and wild animals but can have adverse impacts if the method of identification is inappropriate for the species or question of interest. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to test whether passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags reduced the growth or survival of pythons. We randomly allocated 200 captive-bred Burmese python (Python bivittatus) hatchlings into two groups, tagged versus untagged. Hatchlings were individually identified using a combination of PIT tags and unique colour patterns, and their mass, snout-vent length (SVL) and body condition measured at 9, 73, 134, 220, 292 and 385 days of age. We recorded the date of all mortalities. Python morphometrics and their rate of change increased or fluctuated non-linearly with age. The impact of PIT tagging on python body mass and body mass growth over the 376 day study period was insignificant. PIT tagging additionally had an insignificant impact on python survival. However, we found minor differences in SVL growth between tagged and untagged pythons. These differences peaked at approximately 0.5 mm/day and appeared to drive similar, but more pronounced, differences between tagged and untagged pythons in their rate of change in body condition; peaking at approximately 3–4 g/day. While we cannot be certain that these small differences are, or are not, biologically meaningful, they nonetheless appear to be short-term and readily resolved. Unsurprisingly, the strongest driver of python growth was their age, with growth rapidly increasing or highest amongst younger snakes for all measures of size. Python sex was associated with their body mass and survival, with higher mass but lower survival amongst females. Python size at hatching did not impact on their growth or survival. Our results confirm that PIT tags are a valuable and effective tool for the identification and tracking of captive pythons, and snakes generally, and meet high safety and animal welfare standards. PeerJ Inc. 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8254472/ /pubmed/34249487 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11531 Text en ©2021 Taggart et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Biodiversity Taggart, Patrick L. Morris, Stephen Caraguel, Charles G.B. The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial |
title | The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The impact of PIT tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | impact of pit tags on the growth and survival of pythons is insignificant in randomised controlled trial |
topic | Biodiversity |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34249487 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11531 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taggartpatrickl theimpactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT morrisstephen theimpactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT caraguelcharlesgb theimpactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT taggartpatrickl impactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT morrisstephen impactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT caraguelcharlesgb impactofpittagsonthegrowthandsurvivalofpythonsisinsignificantinrandomisedcontrolledtrial |