Cargando…
Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings
OBJECTIVES: This study identifies the ecological (ie, policy, environment, intrapersonal, and interpersonal) factors affecting the implementation of an Infant at Work program in a university setting. METHODS: Data were collected among faculty, staff, and graduate students at a large Midwestern unive...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12248 |
_version_ | 1783717771997085696 |
---|---|
author | DeMaria, Andrea L. Wierenga, Madison Kelly, Kilian Smith, Sidney Bohning, Anna Bauman, Tessa Schwab‐Reese, Laura |
author_facet | DeMaria, Andrea L. Wierenga, Madison Kelly, Kilian Smith, Sidney Bohning, Anna Bauman, Tessa Schwab‐Reese, Laura |
author_sort | DeMaria, Andrea L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study identifies the ecological (ie, policy, environment, intrapersonal, and interpersonal) factors affecting the implementation of an Infant at Work program in a university setting. METHODS: Data were collected among faculty, staff, and graduate students at a large Midwestern university from February to July 2020 via focus group (FG) discussions with university employees (n = 22) and semistructured interviews with university administrators (n = 10). We used techniques from expanded grounded theory, allowing for a constant comparative approach to data contextualization and theme identification. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the FG data: (i) program and policy scope, (ii) employee and employer benefits, and (iii) workplace concerns. Onsite daycares, flexible schedules and participation, and expanded childcare options were some of the programs and policies employees desired. However, barriers to implementing these types of programs include cost, safety, and structure of the work environment. CONCLUSIONS: Findings offer practical recommendations and strategies to improve work/life balance among parents transitioning back to work in a university environment. Findings also provide insight into the feasibility of family‐friendly workplace policies and environments. Additionally, findings provide a framework for other organizations to implement similar Infant at Work programs to improve employee work/life balance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8254649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82546492021-07-13 Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings DeMaria, Andrea L. Wierenga, Madison Kelly, Kilian Smith, Sidney Bohning, Anna Bauman, Tessa Schwab‐Reese, Laura J Occup Health Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This study identifies the ecological (ie, policy, environment, intrapersonal, and interpersonal) factors affecting the implementation of an Infant at Work program in a university setting. METHODS: Data were collected among faculty, staff, and graduate students at a large Midwestern university from February to July 2020 via focus group (FG) discussions with university employees (n = 22) and semistructured interviews with university administrators (n = 10). We used techniques from expanded grounded theory, allowing for a constant comparative approach to data contextualization and theme identification. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the FG data: (i) program and policy scope, (ii) employee and employer benefits, and (iii) workplace concerns. Onsite daycares, flexible schedules and participation, and expanded childcare options were some of the programs and policies employees desired. However, barriers to implementing these types of programs include cost, safety, and structure of the work environment. CONCLUSIONS: Findings offer practical recommendations and strategies to improve work/life balance among parents transitioning back to work in a university environment. Findings also provide insight into the feasibility of family‐friendly workplace policies and environments. Additionally, findings provide a framework for other organizations to implement similar Infant at Work programs to improve employee work/life balance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8254649/ /pubmed/34217154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12248 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles DeMaria, Andrea L. Wierenga, Madison Kelly, Kilian Smith, Sidney Bohning, Anna Bauman, Tessa Schwab‐Reese, Laura Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings |
title | Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings |
title_full | Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings |
title_fullStr | Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings |
title_short | Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings |
title_sort | ecological factors affecting infant at work policies and programs in university settings |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demariaandreal ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings AT wierengamadison ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings AT kellykilian ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings AT smithsidney ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings AT bohninganna ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings AT baumantessa ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings AT schwabreeselaura ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings |