Cargando…

Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings

OBJECTIVES: This study identifies the ecological (ie, policy, environment, intrapersonal, and interpersonal) factors affecting the implementation of an Infant at Work program in a university setting. METHODS: Data were collected among faculty, staff, and graduate students at a large Midwestern unive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DeMaria, Andrea L., Wierenga, Madison, Kelly, Kilian, Smith, Sidney, Bohning, Anna, Bauman, Tessa, Schwab‐Reese, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12248
_version_ 1783717771997085696
author DeMaria, Andrea L.
Wierenga, Madison
Kelly, Kilian
Smith, Sidney
Bohning, Anna
Bauman, Tessa
Schwab‐Reese, Laura
author_facet DeMaria, Andrea L.
Wierenga, Madison
Kelly, Kilian
Smith, Sidney
Bohning, Anna
Bauman, Tessa
Schwab‐Reese, Laura
author_sort DeMaria, Andrea L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study identifies the ecological (ie, policy, environment, intrapersonal, and interpersonal) factors affecting the implementation of an Infant at Work program in a university setting. METHODS: Data were collected among faculty, staff, and graduate students at a large Midwestern university from February to July 2020 via focus group (FG) discussions with university employees (n = 22) and semistructured interviews with university administrators (n = 10). We used techniques from expanded grounded theory, allowing for a constant comparative approach to data contextualization and theme identification. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the FG data: (i) program and policy scope, (ii) employee and employer benefits, and (iii) workplace concerns. Onsite daycares, flexible schedules and participation, and expanded childcare options were some of the programs and policies employees desired. However, barriers to implementing these types of programs include cost, safety, and structure of the work environment. CONCLUSIONS: Findings offer practical recommendations and strategies to improve work/life balance among parents transitioning back to work in a university environment. Findings also provide insight into the feasibility of family‐friendly workplace policies and environments. Additionally, findings provide a framework for other organizations to implement similar Infant at Work programs to improve employee work/life balance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8254649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82546492021-07-13 Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings DeMaria, Andrea L. Wierenga, Madison Kelly, Kilian Smith, Sidney Bohning, Anna Bauman, Tessa Schwab‐Reese, Laura J Occup Health Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This study identifies the ecological (ie, policy, environment, intrapersonal, and interpersonal) factors affecting the implementation of an Infant at Work program in a university setting. METHODS: Data were collected among faculty, staff, and graduate students at a large Midwestern university from February to July 2020 via focus group (FG) discussions with university employees (n = 22) and semistructured interviews with university administrators (n = 10). We used techniques from expanded grounded theory, allowing for a constant comparative approach to data contextualization and theme identification. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the FG data: (i) program and policy scope, (ii) employee and employer benefits, and (iii) workplace concerns. Onsite daycares, flexible schedules and participation, and expanded childcare options were some of the programs and policies employees desired. However, barriers to implementing these types of programs include cost, safety, and structure of the work environment. CONCLUSIONS: Findings offer practical recommendations and strategies to improve work/life balance among parents transitioning back to work in a university environment. Findings also provide insight into the feasibility of family‐friendly workplace policies and environments. Additionally, findings provide a framework for other organizations to implement similar Infant at Work programs to improve employee work/life balance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8254649/ /pubmed/34217154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12248 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
DeMaria, Andrea L.
Wierenga, Madison
Kelly, Kilian
Smith, Sidney
Bohning, Anna
Bauman, Tessa
Schwab‐Reese, Laura
Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings
title Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings
title_full Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings
title_fullStr Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings
title_full_unstemmed Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings
title_short Ecological factors affecting Infant at Work policies and programs in university settings
title_sort ecological factors affecting infant at work policies and programs in university settings
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34217154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12248
work_keys_str_mv AT demariaandreal ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings
AT wierengamadison ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings
AT kellykilian ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings
AT smithsidney ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings
AT bohninganna ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings
AT baumantessa ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings
AT schwabreeselaura ecologicalfactorsaffectinginfantatworkpoliciesandprogramsinuniversitysettings